Literature DB >> 33058036

Cytomegalovirus disease in de novo kidney-transplant recipients: comparison of everolimus-based immunosuppression without prophylaxis with mycophenolic acid-based immunosuppression with prophylaxis.

Louis Manière1, Johan Noble1, Lionel Rostaing2,3, Thomas Jouve1,4, Florian Terrec1, Hamza Naciri Bennani1, Eloi Chevallier1, Bénédicte Janbon1, Raphaele Germi5, Mathilde Bugnazet1, Farida Imerzoukene1, Paolo Malvezzi1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare everolimus (EVR) plus low-dose tacrolimus (TAC) with mycophenolic acid (MPA) plus standard-dose TAC with regards to rates of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in de novo kidney-transplant recipients (KTRs).
METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included 187 de novo KTRs; 59 patients (31.6%) received EVR/low-dose TAC (group 1); 128 patients (68.4%) received MPA with standard-dose TAC (group 2). All received anti-thymocyte globulins as the induction therapy, and steroid-sparing strategy. Valganciclovir prophylaxis was mandatory for CMV D+/R- KTRs (seronegative recipients of a seropositive donor) in both groups and for R+ seropositive recipients (only in group 2).
RESULTS: The 2-year incidence of CMV disease was low and comparable between groups: 6.8% and 7.0% in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.94). There was no statistical difference in CMV serostatus (p = 1). However, CMV disease tended to be less frequent, though not statistically different, in R+ KTRs receiving EVR without prophylaxis (3.7% vs. 8.5% in groups 1 and 2, respectively) and in patients without EVR discontinuation (2.6% vs. 6.9% in patients who did not discontinue MPA (p = 0.29). Two-year graft function was good and comparable between groups (median eGFR of 54.2 and 53.0 mL/min in groups 1 and 2, respectively; p = 0.47); incidence of immunological events was low. Significantly more patients in group 1 discontinued EVR because of adverse events than patients that discontinued MPA in group 2 (35.6% in group 1 vs. 10.2% in group 2; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Everolimus plus low-dose TAC given to de novo KTRs was associated with low rates of CMV disease, especially in R+ patients with no CMV prophylaxis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cytomegalovirus; Everolimus; Kidney transplantation; Mycophenolic acid; Prophylaxis; Valganciclovir

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33058036     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-020-02676-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  22 in total

Review 1.  Antiviral medications to prevent cytomegalovirus disease and early death in recipients of solid-organ transplants: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Elisabeth M Hodson; Cheryl A Jones; Angela C Webster; Giovanni F M Strippoli; Peter G Barclay; Kathy Kable; Dushyanthi Vimalachandra; Jonathan C Craig
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Jun 18-24       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Delayed-onset primary cytomegalovirus disease and the risk of allograft failure and mortality after kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Supha K Arthurs; Albert J Eid; Rachel A Pedersen; Walter K Kremers; Fernando G Cosio; Robin Patel; Raymund R Razonable
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2008-03-15       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  The efficacy and safety of 200 days valganciclovir cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in high-risk kidney transplant recipients.

Authors:  A Humar; Y Lebranchu; F Vincenti; E A Blumberg; J D Punch; A P Limaye; D Abramowicz; A G Jardine; A T Voulgari; J Ives; I A Hauser; P Peeters
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 8.086

4.  Cytomegalovirus in solid organ transplant recipients.

Authors:  A Humar; D Snydman
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 5.  Human cytomegalovirus and kidney transplantation: a clinician's update.

Authors:  Kristel De Keyzer; Steven Van Laecke; Patrick Peeters; Raymond Vanholder
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 8.860

Review 6.  Cytomegalovirus post kidney transplantation: prophylaxis versus pre-emptive therapy?

Authors:  Thomas Fehr; Pietro E Cippà; Nicolas J Mueller
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 3.782

Review 7.  The Third International Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Cytomegalovirus in Solid-organ Transplantation.

Authors:  Camille N Kotton; Deepali Kumar; Angela M Caliendo; Shirish Huprikar; Sunwen Chou; Lara Danziger-Isakov; Atul Humar
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  A direct and indirect comparison meta-analysis on the efficacy of cytomegalovirus preventive strategies in solid organ transplant.

Authors:  Diana F Florescu; Fang Qiu; Cynthia M Schmidt; Andre C Kalil
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Efficacy and Safety of Everolimus Plus Low-Dose Tacrolimus Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil Plus Standard-Dose Tacrolimus in De Novo Renal Transplant Recipients: 12-Month Data.

Authors:  Y Qazi; D Shaffer; B Kaplan; D Y Kim; F L Luan; V R Peddi; F Shihab; S Tomlanovich; S Yilmaz; K McCague; D Patel; S Mulgaonkar
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 8.086

10.  Reduced Incidence of Cytomegalovirus Infection in Kidney Transplant Recipients Receiving Everolimus and Reduced Tacrolimus Doses.

Authors:  H Tedesco-Silva; C Felipe; A Ferreira; M Cristelli; N Oliveira; T Sandes-Freitas; W Aguiar; E Campos; M Gerbase-DeLima; M Franco; J Medina-Pestana
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 8.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.