Arvind Ganapati1, Mahasampath Gowri2, Belavendra Antonisamy2, Debashish Danda3. 1. Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Christian Medical College & Hospital, Ida Scudder Road, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, 632004, India. 2. Department of Biostatistics, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India. 3. Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Christian Medical College & Hospital, Ida Scudder Road, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, 632004, India. debashisdandacmc@hotmail.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of response to combination conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD) therapy with methotrexate (MTX) and sulfasalazine (SSZ) in active axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) patients without peripheral arthritis (group 1) as compared to active axSpA with peripheral arthritis (group 2), who are economically constrained for biologicals. METHODS: A prospective, observational, single-centre, cohort study on 150 consecutive active axSpA patients who were already initiated on the above mentioned combination csDMARD therapy and satisfying the other pre-defined eligibility criteria, was conducted between July 2016 and July 2017 using ASAS20 response as primary outcome measure at 3 and 6 months post treatment. RESULTS: ASAS20 response at 3 months was achieved in 31/58 (53.4%) and in 24/36 (66.6%) in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.2); at 6 months, these figures were 45/76 (59.2%) and 28/44 (63.6%), respectively (p = 0.6). Similarly, there was significant reduction in mean ASAS NSAID index from 29.6 to 14 over 6 months from baseline (p = 0.001), and it was similar in both groups. Using BASDAI ≥ 4 to define active disease, a 34% reduction in requirement of biologicals was also observed. CONCLUSION: In resource-limited population, treatment with combination of methotrexate and sulphasalazine over a period of 6 months is equally efficacious in patients with active axSpA with and without peripheral arthritis, as evidenced by improved ASAS20 response rates, reduction in NSAID use and fewer patients switching to biologicals. Key Points • Combination of MTX+SSZ was efficacious and safe in active axSpA patients who had economic hardships to use biologicals. • This benefit in axSpA patients was similar between those without any peripheral arthritis and those with. • MTX+SSZ combination therapy also demonstrated NSAID sparing action. • Combination of MTX and SSZ prevented escalation to biological therapy as per a BASDAI score driven policy.
OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of response to combination conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD) therapy with methotrexate (MTX) and sulfasalazine (SSZ) in active axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) patients without peripheral arthritis (group 1) as compared to active axSpA with peripheral arthritis (group 2), who are economically constrained for biologicals. METHODS: A prospective, observational, single-centre, cohort study on 150 consecutive active axSpA patients who were already initiated on the above mentioned combination csDMARD therapy and satisfying the other pre-defined eligibility criteria, was conducted between July 2016 and July 2017 using ASAS20 response as primary outcome measure at 3 and 6 months post treatment. RESULTS:ASAS20 response at 3 months was achieved in 31/58 (53.4%) and in 24/36 (66.6%) in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.2); at 6 months, these figures were 45/76 (59.2%) and 28/44 (63.6%), respectively (p = 0.6). Similarly, there was significant reduction in mean ASAS NSAID index from 29.6 to 14 over 6 months from baseline (p = 0.001), and it was similar in both groups. Using BASDAI ≥ 4 to define active disease, a 34% reduction in requirement of biologicals was also observed. CONCLUSION: In resource-limited population, treatment with combination of methotrexate and sulphasalazine over a period of 6 months is equally efficacious in patients with active axSpA with and without peripheral arthritis, as evidenced by improved ASAS20 response rates, reduction in NSAID use and fewer patients switching to biologicals. Key Points • Combination of MTX+SSZ was efficacious and safe in active axSpA patients who had economic hardships to use biologicals. • This benefit in axSpA patients was similar between those without any peripheral arthritis and those with. • MTX+SSZ combination therapy also demonstrated NSAID sparing action. • Combination of MTX and SSZ prevented escalation to biological therapy as per a BASDAI score driven policy.
Authors: J Braun; J Zochling; X Baraliakos; R Alten; G Burmester; K Grasedyck; J Brandt; H Haibel; M Hammer; A Krause; F Mielke; H-P Tony; W Ebner; B Gömör; J Hermann; H Zeidler; E Beck; M Baumgaertner; J Sieper Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2006-04-10 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: M Rudwaleit; D van der Heijde; R Landewé; J Listing; N Akkoc; J Brandt; J Braun; C T Chou; E Collantes-Estevez; M Dougados; F Huang; J Gu; M A Khan; Y Kirazli; W P Maksymowych; H Mielants; I J Sørensen; S Ozgocmen; E Roussou; R Valle-Oñate; U Weber; J Wei; J Sieper Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2009-03-17 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: M Dougados; S vam der Linden; M Leirisalo-Repo; B Huitfeldt; R Juhlin; E Veys; H Zeidler; T K Kvien; I Olivieri; B Dijkmans Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 1995-05
Authors: J Braun; R van den Berg; X Baraliakos; H Boehm; R Burgos-Vargas; E Collantes-Estevez; H Dagfinrud; B Dijkmans; M Dougados; P Emery; P Geher; M Hammoudeh; R D Inman; M Jongkees; M A Khan; U Kiltz; Tk Kvien; M Leirisalo-Repo; W P Maksymowych; I Olivieri; K Pavelka; J Sieper; E Stanislawska-Biernat; D Wendling; S Ozgocmen; C van Drogen; Bj van Royen; D van der Heijde Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Steven L Truong; Tim McEwan; Paul Bird; Irwin Lim; Nivene F Saad; Lionel Schachna; Andrew L Taylor; Philip C Robinson Journal: Rheumatol Ther Date: 2021-12-28