Yoshikazu Inagaki1, Naohisa Yoshida2, Daisuke Hasegawa3, Kyoichi Kassai1, Ritsu Yasuda4, Ken Inoue4, Ryohei Hirose4, Osamu Dohi4, Takashi Okuda5, Yutaka Inada5, Kotaro Okuda6, Kiyoshi Ogiso7, Akira Tomie8, Koichi Soga9, Takaaki Murakami10, Yoshito Itoh4. 1. Department of Gastroenterology, Nishijin Hospital, Kyoto, Japan. 2. Department of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajii-cho, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan. naohisa@koto.kpu-m.ac.jp. 3. Department of Gastroenterology, Ayabe City Hospital, Kyoto, Japan. 4. Department of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajii-cho, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan. 5. Department of Gastroenterology, Fukuchiyama City Hospital, Kyoto, Japan. 6. Department of Gastroenterology, Kyoto Kujyo Hospital, Kyoto, Japan. 7. Department of Gastroenterology, Osaka General Hospital of West Japan Railway Company, Osaka, Japan. 8. Department of Gastroenterology, Saiseikai Kyoto Hospital, Kyoto, Japan. 9. Department of Gastroenterology, Omihachiman Community Medical Center, Omihachiman, Shiga, Japan. 10. Department of Gastroenterology, Japan Community Health Care Organization, Kyoto Kuramaguchi Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The number of colonoscopy (CS) for the elderly is increasing. There are only a few reports focusing on CS among the very elderly aged ≥ 90-y. We aimed to analyze the efficacy of CS and of colorectal cancer (CRC) for patients aged ≥ 90-y. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients aged ≥ 90-y receiving CS at eight institutions from October 2016 to September 2017. Bowel preparation, complications, and endoscopic diagnosis were analyzed. The non-elderly group aged between 50-y and 64-y and elderly group aged between 65-y and 79-y were compared to very-elderly group aged ≥ 90-y. Through propensity score matching of sex and CS indications (symptomatic or asymptomatic), the number of CRC and the treatment in each group were analyzed. RESULTS: We analyzed 125 patients receiving 154 colonoscopies (0.9%) in the very-elderly group from among 16,968 cases. Among 92 cases who received bowel-cleansing solution, good preparations were achieved in 94.5%. The rate of CS-related complications was 1.3% (2/154). The rate of CRC in the very-elderly group was 27.2% (34/125), higher than the non-elderly group (7.2%, 9/125, p < 0.01) and elderly group (8.8%, 11/125, p < 0.01). Therapeutic interventions for CRC in the very-elderly group were performed in 73.5% (24/34) patients. The mean survival of 12 patients with CRC resection was 788 days. CONCLUSIONS: CS could be performed safely for the very elderly aged ≥ 90-y with careful considerations. CRC was confirmed to be more frequent in this group with over 70% of patients receiving appropriate therapeutic intervention.
INTRODUCTION: The number of colonoscopy (CS) for the elderly is increasing. There are only a few reports focusing on CS among the very elderly aged ≥ 90-y. We aimed to analyze the efficacy of CS and of colorectal cancer (CRC) for patients aged ≥ 90-y. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients aged ≥ 90-y receiving CS at eight institutions from October 2016 to September 2017. Bowel preparation, complications, and endoscopic diagnosis were analyzed. The non-elderly group aged between 50-y and 64-y and elderly group aged between 65-y and 79-y were compared to very-elderly group aged ≥ 90-y. Through propensity score matching of sex and CS indications (symptomatic or asymptomatic), the number of CRC and the treatment in each group were analyzed. RESULTS: We analyzed 125 patients receiving 154 colonoscopies (0.9%) in the very-elderly group from among 16,968 cases. Among 92 cases who received bowel-cleansing solution, good preparations were achieved in 94.5%. The rate of CS-related complications was 1.3% (2/154). The rate of CRC in the very-elderly group was 27.2% (34/125), higher than the non-elderly group (7.2%, 9/125, p < 0.01) and elderly group (8.8%, 11/125, p < 0.01). Therapeutic interventions for CRC in the very-elderly group were performed in 73.5% (24/34) patients. The mean survival of 12 patients with CRC resection was 788 days. CONCLUSIONS: CS could be performed safely for the very elderly aged ≥ 90-y with careful considerations. CRC was confirmed to be more frequent in this group with over 70% of patients receiving appropriate therapeutic intervention.