Rosie P Cornish1,2, John Macleod1, Andy Boyd1, Kate Tilling1,2. 1. Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. 2. MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In observational research, choosing an optimal analysis strategy when variables are incomplete requires an understanding of the factors associated with ongoing participation and non-response, but this cannot be fully examined with incomplete data. Linkage to external datasets provides additional information on those with incomplete data, allowing examination of factors related to missingness. METHODS: We examined the association between baseline sociodemographic factors and ongoing participation in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. We investigated whether child and adolescent outcomes measured in linked education and primary care data were associated with participation, after accounting for baseline factors. To demonstrate the potential for bias, we examined whether the association between maternal smoking and these outcomes differed in the subsample who completed the 19-year questionnaire. RESULTS: Lower levels of school attainment, lower general practitioner (GP) consultation and prescription rates, higher body mass index (BMI), special educational needs (SEN) status, not having an asthma diagnosis, depression and being a smoker were associated with lower participation after adjustment for baseline factors. For example, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) for participation comparing ever smokers (by 18 years) with non-smokers was: 0.65, 95% CI (0.56, 0.75). The associations with maternal smoking differed between the subsample of participants at 19 years and the entire sample, although differences were small and confidence intervals overlapped. For example: for SEN status, OR = 1.19 (1.06, 1.33) (all participants); OR = 1.03 (0.79, 1.45) (subsample). CONCLUSIONS: A range of health-related and educational factors are associated with ongoing participation in ALSPAC; this is likely to be the case in other cohort studies. Researchers need to be aware of this when planning their analysis. Cohort studies can use linkage to routine data to explore predictors of ongoing participation and conduct sensitivity analyses to assess potential bias.
BACKGROUND: In observational research, choosing an optimal analysis strategy when variables are incomplete requires an understanding of the factors associated with ongoing participation and non-response, but this cannot be fully examined with incomplete data. Linkage to external datasets provides additional information on those with incomplete data, allowing examination of factors related to missingness. METHODS: We examined the association between baseline sociodemographic factors and ongoing participation in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. We investigated whether child and adolescent outcomes measured in linked education and primary care data were associated with participation, after accounting for baseline factors. To demonstrate the potential for bias, we examined whether the association between maternal smoking and these outcomes differed in the subsample who completed the 19-year questionnaire. RESULTS: Lower levels of school attainment, lower general practitioner (GP) consultation and prescription rates, higher body mass index (BMI), special educational needs (SEN) status, not having an asthma diagnosis, depression and being a smoker were associated with lower participation after adjustment for baseline factors. For example, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) for participation comparing ever smokers (by 18 years) with non-smokers was: 0.65, 95% CI (0.56, 0.75). The associations with maternal smoking differed between the subsample of participants at 19 years and the entire sample, although differences were small and confidence intervals overlapped. For example: for SEN status, OR = 1.19 (1.06, 1.33) (all participants); OR = 1.03 (0.79, 1.45) (subsample). CONCLUSIONS: A range of health-related and educational factors are associated with ongoing participation in ALSPAC; this is likely to be the case in other cohort studies. Researchers need to be aware of this when planning their analysis. Cohort studies can use linkage to routine data to explore predictors of ongoing participation and conduct sensitivity analyses to assess potential bias.
Authors: Abigail Fraser; Corrie Macdonald-Wallis; Kate Tilling; Andy Boyd; Jean Golding; George Davey Smith; John Henderson; John Macleod; Lynn Molloy; Andy Ness; Susan Ring; Scott M Nelson; Debbie A Lawlor Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2012-04-16 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Espen Bjertness; Ase Sagatun; Kristian Green; Lars Lien; Anne Johanne Søgaard; Randi Selmer Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-10-12 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Rosaleen P Cornish; John Henderson; Andrew W Boyd; Raquel Granell; Tjeerd Van Staa; John Macleod Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2014-04-23 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Mark D Atkinson; Jonathan I Kennedy; Ann John; Keir E Lewis; Ronan A Lyons; Sinead T Brophy Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2017-01-05 Impact factor: 2.796
Authors: Amy E Taylor; Hannah J Jones; Hannah Sallis; Jack Euesden; Evie Stergiakouli; Neil M Davies; Stanley Zammit; Debbie A Lawlor; Marcus R Munafò; George Davey Smith; Kate Tilling Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Alba Fernández-Sanlés; Daniel Smith; Gemma L Clayton; Kate Northstone; Alice R Carter; Louise Ac Millard; Maria Carolina Borges; Nicholas John Timpson; Kate Tilling; Gareth J Griffith; Deborah A Lawlor Journal: Wellcome Open Res Date: 2022-07-08
Authors: Kurt Taylor; Richard Thomas; Mark Mumme; Jean Golding; Andy Boyd; Kate Northstone; Massimo Caputo; Deborah A Lawlor Journal: Wellcome Open Res Date: 2021-04-14
Authors: Louise R Jones; Pauline M Emmett; Nicholas P Hays; Yassaman Shahkhalili; Caroline M Taylor Journal: Nutrients Date: 2021-09-18 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Kate Shiells; Nina Di Cara; Anya Skatova; Oliver S P Davis; Claire M A Haworth; Andy L Skinner; Richard Thomas; Alastair R Tanner; John Macleod; Nicholas J Timpson; Andy Boyd Journal: Int J Popul Data Sci Date: 2022-03-16
Authors: Mark É Czeisler; Joshua F Wiley; Charles A Czeisler; Shantha M W Rajaratnam; Mark E Howard Journal: Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci Date: 2021-05-26 Impact factor: 6.892