Efficient preservation of sprouting vegetables under simulated microgravity conditions.

The effectiveness of a simulated microgravity environment as a novel method for preserving the freshness of vegetables was investigated. Three types of vegetables were selected: vegetable soybean, mung bean sprouts, and white radish sprouts. These selected vegetables were fixed on a three-dimensional rotary gravity controller, rotated slowly. The selected vegetables were stored at 25°C and 66% of relative humidity for 9, 6, or 5 d while undergoing this process. The simulated microgravity was controlled utilizing a gravity controller around 0 m s-2. The mung bean sprouts stored for 6 d under simulated microgravity conditions maintained higher thickness levels than the vegetable samples stored under normal gravity conditions (9.8 m s-2) for the same duration. The mass of all three items decreased with time without regard to the gravity environment, though the samples stored within the simulated microgravity environment displayed significant mass retention on and after 3 d for mung bean sprout samples and 1 d for white radish sprout samples. In contrast, the mass retention effect was not observed in the vegetable soybean samples. Hence, it was confirmed that the mass retention effect of microgravity was limited to sprout vegetables. As a result of analysis harnessing a mathematical model, assuming that the majority of the mass loss is due to moisture loss, a significant difference in mass reduction coefficient occurs among mung bean sprouts and white radish sprouts due to the microgravity environment, and the mass retention effect of simulated microgravity is quantitatively evaluated utilizing mathematical models. Simulated microgravity, which varies significantly from conventional refrigeration, ethylene control, and modified atmosphere, was demonstrated effective as a novel method for preserving and maintaining the freshness of sprout vegetables. This founding will support long-term space flight missions by prolonging shelf life of sprout vegetables.

Introduction

Vegetables constitute an important food staple, forming a source of micronutrients containing vitamins and minerals [1]. However, it is quite difficult to store fresh vegetables and maintain their freshness after they have been harvested, and the loss/waste rate of vegetables during the distribution process is 18% in developed countries and 46% in developing nations [2]. The causes of vegetable loss are due to wilting, loss of L-ascorbic acid [3], discoloration [4], and spoilage [5]. Several methods for preserving vegetable freshness have been studied and analyzed.

Among these methods investigated, refrigeration is the most versatile and prevalent freshness preservation method for vegetables. Li et al. [6] reported the effect of retaining visual acceptability among refrigerated produce, and suppressing mass loss and decay for eight types of items stored at 6°C. Controlled atmosphere (CA) storage, which suppresses respiration under low O2 and high CO2 environments, demonstrates a significant freshness-keeping effect when used in combination with refrigeration, and is employed for the long-term storage of apples [7]. A storage unit is harnessed for CA storage. In contrast, modified atmosphere packaging (MAP), which is obtained by achieving the same effect using a plastic pouch, stops the spoilage of tomatoes [8], the softening of persimmons [9], and suppresses the yellowing of soft kale [10] and vegetable soybeans [11]. The inactivation of ethylene gas as an aging hormone is an effective freshness-keeping method, and a high number of freshness- effects derived from the ethylene-inactivating regent “1-methylcyclopropene” were reported as introduced in a review by Watkins [12]. Heat treatment has been identified as possessing the effect of sterilizing microorganisms, deactivating enzymes, and inducing heat shock protein to maintain freshness in vegetables [13]. Akbudak et al. [14] reported that heating vegetables at 54°C for 5 min was effective for preserving the freshness of tomatoes. However, currently, an impactful freshness preservation method has not been employed practically other than the aforementioned freshness maintenance technologies. Therefore, a novel method of maintaining freshness in vegetables is highly desirable to improve the produce marketplace and industry’s storage abilities.

The wilting of vegetables due to mass loss is an important cause of degradation in vegetables after the harvest period. The majority of the mass loss in vegetables after harvest is due to moisture loss, which is mainly associated with transpiration [15]. Hirano and Kitaya [16] reported that transpiration increases with higher levels of gravity over the course of a parabolic airplane flight experiment utilizing grown strawberries as a plant sample. This phenomenon of increased transpiration may also be observed within postharvest vegetables. Thus, it is hypothesized that the transpiration rates and mass loss of vegetables postharvest can be reduced by placing the vegetables under a controlled microgravity environment.

In recent years, a device capable for creating and maintaining a microgravity environment on Earth has been developed and harnessed to investigate biological reactions in outer space. The principle of operation of the microgravity device is to rotate the object 360° slowly in order to bring the mean value of gravity close to 0 m s−2. To be precise, the created conditions are different from the microgravity conditions found in outer space, so the machine is suitably referred to as a simulated microgravity device. Several studies published investigating the applications of this device include the homogenization of crystals [17], the attenuation of rat myogenic differentiation [18], and the effects of microgravity on epidermal stem cell metabolism [19]. Experiments utilizing plants have reported microRNAs in tomato that respond to gravity [20] and the delay of rice flowering in a simulated microgravity environment [21]. However, no report has been found concerning changes in the quality of horticultural products after harvest in relation to an experimental microgravity environment.

Therefore, the objective of this study was to demonstrate the effectiveness of vegetable storage and freshness preservation facilitated by a simulated microgravity environment as a new method for produce quality protection postharvest. Since a stable supply of food is important for long-term stays in space, research on food production in space environment has been conducted in recent years [22]. The results of this study will support long-term stay missions by extending the shelf life of the crop.

Materials and methods

Samples

After a single day following harvest, vegetable soybeans (Glycine max (L.) Merr.), mung bean sprouts (Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek), and white radish sprouts (Raphanus sativus var. longipinnatus) were purchased from a supermarket in Tokyo.

Storage method

Vegetables were prepared in an A-04 Fix Box (AS ONE Corp., Osaka) (Fig 1(A)). Five sheaths of vegetable soybeans, five mung bean sprouts, or three bundles of white radish sprouts (four sprouts per bundle) were fixed within each box. Four boxes were prepared for each type of vegetable and then divided into two groups. Since the box has a vent, the samples were kept under normoxia (O2 21%, CO2 0.04%).

Fig 1

(A) A box (A-04 Fix Box, AS ONE Corp., Osaka) to store samples (scale bar: 10 mm) and (B) Method to store vegetables under different gravity levels in a thermohygrostat. (a) Samples (e.g., mung bean sprouts) stored under simulated microgravity in a box set on the inner frame of the gravity controller (Gravite®, Space Bio-Laboratories Co., Ltd. Hiroshima, Japan) (new treatment) (b) samples stored under normal gravity in a box (control treatment) (c) inner flame (d) outer flame (e) accelerometer (f) hygrothermograph.

One group of vegetables was attached to the inner flame of the gravity controller (Gravite®, Space Bio-Laboratories Co., Ltd. Hiroshima, Japan) affixed with curing tape as shown in Fig 1(B) and stored under simulated microgravity conditions by rotating the inner and outer flames 360° at 4 and 2 rotations per minute, respectively. The controller was set in a thermohygrostat (25°C, relative humidity 66%). Another study group was stored in the same thermohygrostat as the control sample. Storage periods were 9, 6, and 5 d for vegetable soybeans, mung bean sprouts, and white radish sprouts, respectively.

Shooting of mung bean sprouts using computer vision system

Mung beans sprouts were shot on 0 and 6 d to identify the form of the samples using the same computer vision system (FMVU-13S2C-CS, Point Grey Research Inc., Richmond, British Columbia, Canada) as the previous report [23]. A clear outline of a sample was traced utilizing the outline detection filter of Adobe Photoshop ver. 13.0.1 (Adobe Systems Inc., San Jose, CA).

Measurement of mass retention rate

The mass retention rate was calculated from the measured mass value following this equation [11]: where M denotes the mass of a sample (g), subscript r denotes the retention rate, and t denotes the storage period, with zero denoting the initial day.

Analysis of mass loss velocity

The majority of mass loss in vegetables postharvest is caused by moisture loss [15]. Therefore, the moisture diffusion model was coopted for analyzing the mass reduction velocity of the vegetables in the present study. In addition, the influence of gravity on the mass reduction rate of sampled vegetables was mathematically analyzed using the following equation [24, 25] on the basis of moisture diffusion: where k denotes the mass reduction coefficient of a sample (d−1), t denotes the storage period (d), and subscript e denotes the assumed equilibrium.

Eq 2 was transformed to a linear model as Eq 3 and mass retention rare values measured in Subsection 2.4 were substituted into the following equation:

Statistical analysis

The mean data for mass retention rates and k values were compared using Student’s t-test (p < 0.05) with JMP® Pro ver. 14.2.0 software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA; p < 0.05) and linear regression analysis were additionally performed using the same software.

Results and discussion

Fig 2 displays the changes over time in the measured values of gravitational acceleration, calculated with the accelerometer installed in the gravity controller. The gravitational acceleration under the experimental environment where the vegetable sample prepared as the control was placed measured 9.8 m s−2, and the sample attached to the gravity controller was stored in an environment where the gravitational acceleration measured ca. 0 m s−2. The principle of operation of the microgravity device is to rotate the object 360° slowly in order to bring the mean value of gravity close to 0 m s−2 [26]. Within this study, it was considered possible to conduct an experiment to adequately investigate the effect of gravity on the mass loss of postharvest vegetables.

Fig 2

Changes in gravity on the gravity controller (e.g., mung bean sprouts).

Full line: x axis, dashed line: y axis, chain line: z axis.

Fig 3 displays the shapes of the sampled mung bean sprouts before storage and after 6 d storage. A comparison between Fig 3(A) and 3(C) before storage demonstrated similar shapes, but the shapes following storage under normal gravity (Fig 3(B)) and simulated microgravity (Fig 3(D)) were varied, respectively. The thickness of the vegetable sample in Fig 3(D) was retained at higher rates than in Fig 3(B). Nagano and Shimaji [27] reported that the higher the levels of the moisture content in vegetables, the wider the plant width, and Bovi et al. [15] found that the mass loss of vegetables postharvest was mainly attributed to moisture loss. According to the aforementioned findings, it was thought that the thickness of mung bean sprouts was retained under the simulated microgravity environment because moisture levels were retained in the experimental conditions.

Fig 3

Typical changes in the shape of mung bean sprouts at different gravity levels (scale bar: 10 mm).

(a) a sample before the start of storage under normal gravity [mass retention rate (M): 100%], (b) a sample after storage under normal gravity (M: 5.5%), (c) a sample before the start of storage under simulated microgravity (M: 100%), (d) a sample after storage under simulated microgravity (M: 17.8%).

Fig 4 displays the changes in the mass retention rates of the three types of studied vegetables over time. The principle of operation of the microgravity device is to rotate the object 360° slowly in order to bring the mean value of gravity close to 0 m s−2 [26]. Normal gravity was 9.8 m s−2 (gravitational acceleration on earth). In the case of vegetable soybean, the difference in gravity levels did not affect the mass retention rate during the storage period for 9 d. In contrast, in the case of mung bean sprouts, the mass retention rate was significantly higher in the simulated microgravity environment, on and after 3 d following the initiation of storage, and in the case of white radish sprouts, on and after 1 d following the beginning of storage. This suggests that the simulated microgravity environment possesses a mass retention effect, and that the effect varies depending on the type of vegetable present under these conditions.

Fig 4

Changes in mass retention rates of (A) vegetable soybeans, (B) mung bean sprouts, and (C) white radish sprouts. Symbols are the means of ten (A, B) and six (C) measurements ± standard error. Dashed and full lines denote the data under normal gravity and simulated microgravity levels, respectively. Asterisks denote significant difference at p < 0.05 by Student’s t-test on the same day and vegetable.

Table 1 displays the results of a two-way ANOVA of the effects of storage gravity environment and storage period on the mass retention of three types of vegetables. The mass retention rate of all three types of vegetable decreased significantly in relation to the storage period, though the effect of gravity was limited to mung bean sprouts and white radish sprouts. This result also supports the result of Fig 4.

Table 1

Two-way analysis of variance on the effect of gravity and storage period on mass retention rate of vegetables.

Vegetable	Effect	Degree of freedom	Sum of square	F	p
Vegetable soybean	Gravity	1	189	3.00	<0.0875
	Storage period	3	14200	75.5	<0.0001***
	Interaction	3	47.8	0.253	<0.859
	Error	72	453
	Total	79	19000
Mung bean sprout	Gravity	1	2910	27.2	<0.0001***
	Storage period	5	52600	98.3	<0.0001***
	Interaction	5	344	0.643	<0.668
	Error	108	11600
	Total	119	67500
White radish sprout	Gravity	1	1450	38.9	<0.0001***
	Storage period	4	31300	210	<0.0001***
	Interaction	4	57.0	0.381	0.821
	Error	50	1870
	Total	59	34700

*** Significant at 99.9% level.

Fig 5 displays the results of analysis using Eqs 2 and 3 assuming that the mass reduction is due to moisture loss. In this study, M of vegetables was substituted into Eq 3 as vegetable soybean: 28.3% [28], mung bean sprouts: 1.3% (minimum measured data), and white radish sprouts: 1.1% (minimum measured data). According to the result from Fig 5(A), when the measured data of Fig 4 was substituted into Eq 3, a linear relationship was observed. This suggests that the temporal change of the mass retention rate can be analyzed using Eq 2 in the same format as the moisture diffusion rate equation. According to the results in Fig 5(B), the simulated microgravity significantly affected the k values of mung bean sprouts and white radish sprouts, though it did not affect the k values of vegetable soybean. It is possible that the k value was significantly suppressed, and that the mass retention rate was significantly high under the simulated microgravity environment on the basis of the results mentioned above. Since the k values of mung bean sprouts and white radish sprouts were higher than those of vegetable soybean, it was taken into account that the decrease in mass retention rates of sprout vegetables with time were deemed remarkable. It was confirmed that the sprout vegetables demonstrated a significant mass loss compared to the grain studied and that it was difficult for sprout vegetables to maintain their freshness.

Fig 5

(A) Typical linear regression for calculating mass reduction coefficients of vegetable soybeans (triangle), mung bean sprouts (circle), and white radish sprouts (square) stored under normal (closed symbols and dashed lines) and under micro- (open symbols and full lines) gravities; M and M denote the mass retention rate over the course of storage and assumed equilibrium mass retention rate, respectively. (B) Means ± ten (vegetable soybeans, mung bean sprouts) and six (white radish sprouts) measurements ± standard error of mass reduction coefficients. Closed and open bars denote the data under normal gravity and simulated microgravity levels. Asterisks denote significant difference at p < 0.05 by Student’s t-test on the same vegetable.

According to the results in Fig 4, mass loss of vegetables cannot be suppressed even under the microgravity condition. However, in the present study, simulated microgravity exhibited the effect of preserving the mass retention rate of sprout vegetables such as mung bean sprouts and white radish sprouts. Because vegetable soybean is a product obtained by harvesting a portion of the grain, it is thought that the moisture lost from the surface of the sheath led to subsequent mass loss. This mechanism of mass loss may not be affected dependent of gravity levels. In contrast, the two types of sprout vegetables possess roots, stems and leaves, and it is possible that, in addition to the dissipation of moisture from the plant surface, moisture also moved from the roots through the plant canal, leading to transpiration from the leaves. The k value in Fig 5(B) is considered to be the value corresponding to the combined moisture loss by transpiration and moisture loss from the plant surface. Regarding the effect of microgravity on plant tissue, there are several studies utilizing Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh as a sample. Leitz et al. [29] reported that gravitational sensing sites such as endothelial cells and columella cells were deformed and activated when the kinetic energy of statolith sedimentation was converted into biochemical signals. Toyota et al. [30] reported that sedimentation leads to the activation of mechanosensitive Ca2+ channels, resulting in elevated Ca2+ concentrations in plants. Under the simulated microgravity environment, the direction of gravity is not able to be sensed, the moisture loss due to transpiration is suppressed, and the k value decreases, so it is possible that the mass was retained.

The decline in mass (i.e., mostly moisture) of vegetables lowers nutritional quality, salability (due to wilting, shriveling, softening, increased flaccidity, limpness, loss of crispness, and juiciness), and economic income, due to the loss of salable mass [31]. Therefore, mass retention is important in maintaining freshness, and the mass retention of vegetables by refrigeration [6], CA storage [32], MAP [33], though there are no reports regarding mass retention of vegetables stored in microgravity environments. Although the range of the data in the present study is limited to sprout vegetables, it was suggested by the results that a simulated microgravity environment is effective as a novel freshness preservation technique for postharvest vegetables. When simulated microgravity is employed in combination with conventional storage technologies such as low temperature and modified atmosphere (low O2, high CO2), it is possible that a synergy mass retention effect may be observed.

In addition, data on vegetable freshness in a simulated microgravity environment may be useful for space development research. Several studies on plant cultivation in space exist in current literature. Kitaya et al. [34] cultivated tomato seedlings in a Controlled Ecological Life Support System and promoted growth by supplying CO2. Takahashi et al. [35] investigated the effect of auxin on tropism by performing a cucumber germination experiment aboard a space shuttle. Paul et al. [22] introduced many reports on plant biology enabled by the space shuttle, e.g. Brassica plants on STS-87 had altered chloroplast morphology and altered chlorophyll a/b ratios. Since no data have been found concerning changes in the freshness of postharvest vegetables in outer space, it is hoped that the results of this study will be confirmed in outer space in the future.

Conclusions

The overall effect of preserving the freshness of postharvest vegetables under a simulated microgravity environment produced by slowly rotating an object by 360° was investigated in this study. The mass loss of two types of vegetables, mung bean sprouts and white radish sprouts, was suppressed by placing them under a simulated microgravity environment. Since mass loss is a serious phenomenon of freshness degradation among harvested vegetables, the effect of preserving the freshness of vegetables was recognized in the simulated microgravity environment. In contrast, in the case of vegetable soybeans, the suppression of mass loss in the samples was not observed under the pseudo-microgravity environment. According to the aforementioned results, it was confirmed that the simulated microgravity environment possesses the effect of preserving the freshness of the studied sprout vegetables. Since the mass reduction coefficient of the mathematical model for calculating the mass reduction velocity was minimized to be smaller under the simulated microgravity environment than under the normal gravity environment, the freshness preservation effect under the simulated microgravity environment was quantitatively proved. This founding will support long-term space flight missions by prolonging shelf life of sprout vegetables.

10 Sep 2020

PONE-D-20-24552

Depression of mass loss of sprout vegetables under simulated microgravity

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Makino,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised by a reviewer in the field and editorial comments during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Oct 25 2020 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Dr. Sakamuri V. Reddy

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2.Thank you for stating the following in the Financial Disclosure:

[The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.].

We note that one or more of the authors have an affiliation to the commercial funders of this research study : [Space Bio-Laboratories Co., Ltd].

1. Please provide an amended Funding Statement declaring this commercial affiliation, as well as a statement regarding the Role of Funders in your study. If the funding organization did not play a role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript and only provided financial support in the form of authors' salaries and/or research materials, please review your statements relating to the author contributions, and ensure you have specifically and accurately indicated the role(s) that these authors had in your study. You can update author roles in the Author Contributions section of the online submission form.

Please also include the following statement within your amended Funding Statement.

“The funder provided support in the form of salaries for authors [insert relevant initials], but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section.”

If your commercial affiliation did play a role in your study, please state and explain this role within your updated Funding Statement.

2. Please also provide an updated Competing Interests Statement declaring this commercial affiliation along with any other relevant declarations relating to employment, consultancy, patents, products in development, or marketed products, etc.

Within your Competing Interests Statement, please confirm that this commercial affiliation does not alter your adherence to all PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials by including the following statement: "This does not alter our adherence to  PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.” (as detailed online in our guide for authors http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests). If this adherence statement is not accurate and  there are restrictions on sharing of data and/or materials, please state these. Please note that we cannot proceed with consideration of your article until this information has been declared.

Please include both an updated Funding Statement and Competing Interests Statement in your cover letter. We will change the online submission form on your behalf.

Please know it is PLOS ONE policy for corresponding authors to declare, on behalf of all authors, all potential competing interests for the purposes of transparency. PLOS defines a competing interest as anything that interferes with, or could reasonably be perceived as interfering with, the full and objective presentation, peer review, editorial decision-making, or publication of research or non-research articles submitted to one of the journals. Competing interests can be financial or non-financial, professional, or personal. Competing interests can arise in relationship to an organization or another person. Please follow this link to our website for more details on competing interests: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

The authors demonstrate that simulated microgravity is effective over conventional methods such as refrigeration to preserve the nutritional value of sprout vegetables. They should consider rephrasing the title, ex., “Efficient preservation of sprouting vegetables under simulated microgravity conditions”. They have observed that vegetable sprouts placed in a simulated microgravity environment preserve the mass maintaining freshness over time. However, they should clarify the implications of the study with respect to space environment or during long-term space flight missions in conclusions of Abstract, Introduction and Conclusions noted (p.11; line 262). Methods-(p.6; line 136) they should clarify the section for statistical significance considered. Also, they should provide microgravity simulation method with citation. Provide a rationale for Fig.2 and Fig.4 under Results and Discussion (p.6; line 142 & p.7; line 171). Fig.3 provided appears to be an illustration. They should show real picture or image of mung bean sprouts under experimental conditions. They should explain the Fig.5B results clearly. The figure shows closed bars and open bars representing normal and microgravity conditions, however no significant change in Soybean. They should explain the results and Figure.5 clearly for the decrease in mass loss under microgravity conditions. I suggest the authors to proofread and take language assistance in preparing the manuscript.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This is a clearly written, easy to read research article. It approaches the concept of using a clinostat from a completely new angle - to increase shelf life and improve food preservation of sprouts. While not necessary to add to this current work, I noted the mention of ethylene scrubbing as a means of food preservation, and I am curious if the author has considered the problems that plants often encounter with ethylene in an enclosed environment, specifically on clinostats and in the true microgravity of spaceflight. Ray Wheeler has several publications on this topic, and it seems odd that they were not addressed nor mentioned. I encourage them to look into the topic.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: C.M. Johnson

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

1 Oct 2020

We have submit "Response to Reviewers.docx" through this submission system to respond to specific reviewer and editor comments.

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Click here for additional data file.

5 Oct 2020

Efficient preservation of sprouting vegetables under simulated microgravity conditions

PONE-D-20-24552R1

Dear Dr. Makino,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Dr. Sakamuri V. Reddy

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

7 Oct 2020

PONE-D-20-24552R1

Efficient preservation of sprouting vegetables under simulated microgravity conditions

Dear Dr. Makino:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Sakamuri V. Reddy

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE