Literature DB >> 33055141

Clinical effectiveness of different natalizumab interval dosing schedules in a large Italian population of patients with multiple sclerosis.

Clara Grazia Chisari1, Luigi Maria Grimaldi2, Giuseppe Salemi3, Paolo Ragonese3, Pietro Iaffaldano4, Simona Bonavita5, Maddalena Sparaco5, Marco Rovaris6, Alessia D'Arma6, Alessandra Lugaresi7,8, Maria Teresa Ferrò9, Paola Grossi9, Alessia Di Sapio10, Eleonora Cocco11, Franco Granella12, Erica Curti12, Vito Lepore13,14, Maria Trojano4, Francesco Patti15.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Natalizumab (NTZ) is one of the most effective treatment options for multiple sclerosis (MS) treatment. Our study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of NTZ when administered according to the extended dosing strategy compared with standard 4-weekly administration in a large Italian MS population.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective multicentre study included patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RR-MS) who received NTZ administrations between the 1 June 2012 and the 15 May 2018 and were followed by the 'Italian MS Register'. All patients with MS were stratified into two groups based on NTZ administration schedule: standard interval dosing (SID) patients who received infusions on average from 28 to 32 days (median 30) and extended interval dosing (EID) including patients who have been infused with interval between 33 and 49 days (median 43). Clinical data were assessed at baseline (before starting NTZ), after 12 (T1) and 24 months (T2) of treatment.
RESULTS: Out of 5231 patients with RR-MS screened, 2092 (mean age 43.2±12.0, 60.6% women) were enrolled. A total of 1254 (59.9%) received NTZ according to SID, and 838 (40.1%) according to EID. At 12 and 24 months, no differences in terms of annualised relapse rate and disability status were found between the two groups. Progression index and confirmed disability worsening were similar between the two groups. DISCUSSION: The use of NTZ with an extended interval schedule showed similar effectiveness compared with SID. Unchanged clinical efficacy of EID schedule may raise the question of a possible advantage in terms of tolerability and safety. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33055141     DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2020-323472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry        ISSN: 0022-3050            Impact factor:   10.154


  6 in total

Review 1.  Advances in Treatment of Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy.

Authors:  Raphaël Bernard-Valnet; Igor J Koralnik; Renaud Du Pasquier
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 11.274

Review 2.  Central Nervous System Infections in Immunocompromised Patients.

Authors:  Amy A Pruitt
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 3.  Infection Mitigation Strategies for Multiple Sclerosis Patients on Oral and Monoclonal Disease-Modifying Therapies.

Authors:  Tyler Ellis Smith; Ilya Kister
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 5.081

4.  No evidence for loss of natalizumab effectiveness with every-6-week dosing: a propensity score-matched comparison with every-4-week dosing in patients enrolled in the Tysabri Observational Program (TOP).

Authors:  Helmut Butzkueven; Ludwig Kappos; Tim Spelman; Maria Trojano; Heinz Wiendl; Ray Su; Shirley Liao; Robert Hyde; Stephanie Licata; Pei-Ran Ho; Nolan Campbell
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 6.570

5.  Extended Interval Dosing Natalizumab and impact on neuropsychological deficits in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Eileen J McManus; Karen M Clark; Christopher Frampton; Jamie A B Macniven; Jan Schepel
Journal:  Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin       Date:  2022-02-23

6.  No increase of serum neurofilament light in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients switching from standard to extended-interval dosing of natalizumab.

Authors:  Magnus Johnsson; Helen H Farman; Kaj Blennow; Henrik Zetterberg; Clas Malmeström; Markus Axelsson; Jan Lycke
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 5.855

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.