Moritz Z Kayser1, Christina Valtin1, Mark Greer1,2, Bernd Karow3, Jan Fuge1,2, Jens Gottlieb1,2. 1. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany. 2. Biomedical Research in Endstage and Obstructive Lung Disease Hannover, German Center for Lung Research, Hannover, Germany. 3. Department for Hospital Innovation and Quality Management, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Abstract
Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has disrupted health care systems worldwide. This is due to both to the reallocation of resources toward COVID-19 patients as well as concern for the risk of nosocomial severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) exposure. The interruption of routine care is especially problematic for patients with chronic conditions requiring regular follow-up, such as lung transplant (LTx) recipients. Introduction: New methods such as telemedicine are needed to bridge the gap in follow-up care caused by the pandemic. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of video consultations (VCs) in comparison with on-site visits (OSVs) was performed during a 6-week period in an LTx center in Germany. VC included a structured work-up questionnaire and vital sign documentation. Results: During the 6-week study period, 75 VCs were performed for 53 patients and 75 OSVs by 51 patients occurred. By the end of our study period, 77% of physician-patient contacts occurred through VC. Physician-patient consultations were reduced by 47% compared with the equivalent time frame in 2019. In 62% of cases, VC resulted in a concrete clinical decision. One COVID-19 patient in home quarantine was admitted due to respiratory failure detected by VC. Patient satisfaction with VC was high. Discussion: Implementation of VC helped to reduce the need for OSV and thus the risk of SARS-CoV-2 exposure in our patient cohort. This technology can be adopted to provide care for a wide range of chronic illnesses. Conclusions: VC can preserve access to specialist care while reducing SARS-CoV-2 exposure for patients with chronic illnesses during the pandemic.
Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has disrupted health care systems worldwide. This is due to both to the reallocation of resources toward COVID-19patients as well as concern for the risk of nosocomial severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) exposure. The interruption of routine care is especially problematic for patients with chronic conditions requiring regular follow-up, such as lung transplant (LTx) recipients. Introduction: New methods such as telemedicine are needed to bridge the gap in follow-up care caused by the pandemic. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of video consultations (VCs) in comparison with on-site visits (OSVs) was performed during a 6-week period in an LTx center in Germany. VC included a structured work-up questionnaire and vital sign documentation. Results: During the 6-week study period, 75 VCs were performed for 53 patients and 75 OSVs by 51 patients occurred. By the end of our study period, 77% of physician-patient contacts occurred through VC. Physician-patient consultations were reduced by 47% compared with the equivalent time frame in 2019. In 62% of cases, VC resulted in a concrete clinical decision. One COVID-19patient in home quarantine was admitted due to respiratory failure detected by VC. Patient satisfaction with VC was high. Discussion: Implementation of VC helped to reduce the need for OSV and thus the risk of SARS-CoV-2 exposure in our patient cohort. This technology can be adopted to provide care for a wide range of chronic illnesses. Conclusions: VC can preserve access to specialist care while reducing SARS-CoV-2 exposure for patients with chronic illnesses during the pandemic.
Entities:
Keywords:
home health monitoring; infectious disease; pandemic; telemedicine; web-based
Authors: Jens Gottlieb; Alexander Reuss; Konstantin Mayer; Karin Weide; Carmen Schade-Brittinger; Susanne Hoyer; Peter Jaksch Journal: Trials Date: 2021-01-11 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Hannah Bradwell; Rebecca Baines; Katie J Edwards; Sebastian Stevens; Kate Atkinson; Ellen Wilkinson; Arunangsu Chatterjee; Ray B Jones Journal: JMIR Form Res Date: 2022-03-21
Authors: Da-Hee Park; Tanja Meltendorf; Kai G Kahl; Jan C Kamp; Manuel J Richter; Marius M Hoeper; Karen M Olsson; Jan Fuge Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2022-02-22 Impact factor: 4.157
Authors: Da Hee Park; Jan Fuge; Tanja Meltendorf; Kai G Kahl; Manuel J Richter; Henning Gall; Hossein A Ghofrani; Jan C Kamp; Marius M Hoeper; Karen M Olsson Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2021-06-24 Impact factor: 4.157