Literature DB >> 3305464

A prospective randomized trial of ceftazidime versus cefazolin/tobramycin in the treatment of hospitalized patients with pneumonia.

L A Mandell, L E Nicolle, A R Ronald, S J Landis, R Duperval, G K Harding, H G Robson, R Feld, J Vincelette, I Fong.   

Abstract

Ceftazidime and cefazolin/tobramycin were compared in the treatment of hospitalized patients with pneumonia. Iv doses 8-hourly were: ceftazidime--2 g, cefazolin--1.5 g, tobramycin--1.7 mg/kg. For patients with pseudomonas infection randomized to cefazolin/tobramycin, ticarcillin (3 g iv 4-hourly) was used instead of cefazolin. One hundred and ten of 129 patients were evaluable (ceftazidime = 52, cefazolin/tobramycin = 58). Seventy five cases (68%) had documented pathogens of which 81% were aerobic Gram-negative bacilli. Analysis of clinical response showed no difference in overall results (P = 0.77), or separate outcomes: cured (P = 0.85), improved (P = 0.62), failed (P = 0.53), or relapsed (P = 0.50). No differences in bacteriological response were noted either: eradication (P greater than 0.10), elimination with recurrence (P greater than 0.10), persistence (P greater than 0.10). The incidence of enterococcal and fungal colonization and superinfection was the same for both regimens. There was a greater incidence of Coombs' test positivity with ceftazidime (P less than 0.01) but greater nephrotoxicity with cefazolin/tobramycin (P less than 0.02). Ceftazidime appears to be as efficacious as cefazolin/tobramycin in the treatment of hospitalized patients with pneumonia, and is less nephrotoxic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3305464     DOI: 10.1093/jac/20.1.95

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  7 in total

1.  Multicentre clinical trials in infectious diseases in Canada.

Authors: 
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  1992-03

2.  Effects of a restrictive antibiotic policy on clinical efficacy of antibiotics and susceptibility patterns of organisms.

Authors:  A W Sturm
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 3.  Beta lactam antibiotic monotherapy versus beta lactam-aminoglycoside antibiotic combination therapy for sepsis.

Authors:  Mical Paul; Adi Lador; Simona Grozinsky-Glasberg; Leonard Leibovici
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-01-07

4.  Prospective, randomized comparison of intravenous and oral ciprofloxacin with intravenous ceftazidime in the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia.

Authors:  R Saginur; G Garber; G Darling; S Shafran; W Cameron; G Jones; F Auclair
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  1997-03

5.  Prospective randomized comparison of imipenem-cilastatin and piperacillin-tazobactam in nosocomial pneumonia or peritonitis.

Authors:  C Jaccard; N Troillet; S Harbarth; G Zanetti; D Aymon; R Schneider; R Chiolero; B Ricou; J Romand; O Huber; P Ambrosetti; G Praz; D Lew; J Bille; M P Glauser; A Cometta
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Beta lactam monotherapy versus beta lactam-aminoglycoside combination therapy for sepsis in immunocompetent patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.

Authors:  Mical Paul; Ishay Benuri-Silbiger; Karla Soares-Weiser; Leonard Leibovici
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-03-02

Review 7.  Guidelines for the management of hospital-acquired pneumonia in the UK: report of the working party on hospital-acquired pneumonia of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.

Authors:  R G Masterton; A Galloway; G French; M Street; J Armstrong; E Brown; J Cleverley; P Dilworth; C Fry; A D Gascoigne; Alan Knox; Dilip Nathwani; Robert Spencer; Mark Wilcox
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 5.790

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.