Literature DB >> 33054517

Sperm viability varies with buffer and genotype in Drosophila melanogaster.

Ruijian Guo1, Anna-Lena Henke1, Klaus Reinhardt1.   

Abstract

Sperm quality, an important male fitness trait, is commonly compared between studies. However, few studies consider how genetic and environmental variation affect sperm quality, even in the genetic model Drosophila melanogaster. Here we show that sperm viability, the proportion of live sperm, differed across the genotypes Oregon-R, Dahomey, and Canton-S by more than 15%, and across buffers (phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), Grace's Medium and Drosophila Ringer solution) by more than 20%. In terms of genotype-buffer pair comparisons, nearly half of the comparisons would produce significant differences in sperm viability (15 in 36), or its temporal decrease in a stress medium (19 in 36). Grace's medium produced the longest-lived sperm in vitro and the smallest differences between genotypes, Drosophila Ringer Solution produced the shortest lifespan and the largest differences. Our results suggest that fly and other sperm researchers would benefit from a standardized protocol of measuring sperm viability.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Live/dead kit; genotype-by-environment interaction; sperm diluent; sperm fluorescent staining; sperm function; sperm metabolism

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33054517      PMCID: PMC7808417          DOI: 10.1080/19336934.2020.1837592

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fly (Austin)        ISSN: 1933-6934            Impact factor:   2.160


  21 in total

1.  A comparison of rat and Drosophila spermatozoan metabolisms.

Authors:  B W Geer; K R Kelley; T H Pohlman; S J Yemm
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol B       Date:  1975-01-15

2.  Effect of different monosaccharides and disaccharides on boar sperm quality after cryopreservation.

Authors:  José Gómez-Fernández; Emilio Gómez-Izquierdo; Cristina Tomás; Eva Mocé; Eduardo de Mercado
Journal:  Anim Reprod Sci       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 2.145

3.  Quantitative trait locus analysis of male mating success and sperm competition in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Kimberly A Hughes; Jeff Leips
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Flow cytometry as an estimation tool for honey bee sperm viability.

Authors:  Piotr Rzymski; Aleksandra Langowska; Monika Fliszkiewicz; Barbara Poniedziałek; Jacek Karczewski; Krzysztof Wiktorowicz
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Influence of female age, sperm senescence and multiple mating on sperm viability in female Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Preethi Radhakrishnan; Kenneth M Fedorka
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 2.354

6.  Effects of trehalose supplementation on semen quality and oxidative stress variables in frozen-thawed bovine semen.

Authors:  J-H Hu; L-S Zan; X-L Zhao; Q-W Li; Z-L Jiang; Y-K Li; X Li
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Metabolic Rate and Oxygen Radical Levels Increase But Radical Generation Rate Decreases with Male Age in Drosophila melanogaster Sperm.

Authors:  Biz R Turnell; Klaus Reinhardt
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 6.053

8.  mtDNA polymorphism and metabolic inhibition affect sperm performance in conplastic mice.

Authors:  Maximiliano Tourmente; Misa Hirose; Saleh Ibrahim; Damian K Dowling; Daniel M Tompkins; Eduardo R S Roldan; Neil J Gemmell
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 3.906

9.  Flow cytometry as a rapid and reliable method to quantify sperm viability in the honeybee Apis mellifera.

Authors:  Ellen Paynter; Barbara Baer-Imhoof; Matthew Linden; Tracey Lee-Pullen; Kathy Heel; Paul Rigby; Boris Baer
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 4.355

10.  Coevolution of Drosophila melanogaster mtDNA and Wolbachia genotypes.

Authors:  Yury Ilinsky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.