Literature DB >> 33054504

Dental Research Waste in Design, Analysis, and Reporting: A Scoping Review.

N Pandis1, P S Fleming2, C Katsaros1, J P A Ioannidis3.   

Abstract

Research waste is highly prevalent across biomedical investigations. We aimed to assess the evidence on the extent of research waste in dental research. We performed a scoping review of empirical evaluations of dental studies assessing the prevalence and impact of limitations in design, conduct, analysis, and reporting of research. PubMed was searched using specific terms to retrieve studies dealing with design, conduct, analysis, and reporting of studies in dentistry, with no year or language restrictions. Of the 1,807 publications identified from the search and from manual searches, 71 were included in this review. The topic and article selection was based on the expert opinion of the authors. The existing evidence suggests that, although there are improvements over time, substantial deficiencies in all areas (design, conduct, analysis, reporting) were prevalent in dental research publications. Waste in research is a multifaceted problem without a simple solution. However, an appreciation of optimal research design and execution is a prerequisite and should be underpinned by policies that include appropriate training in research methods and properly aligned incentives.

Keywords:  conflict of interest; sample size; study analysis; study bias; study registration; study reporting

Year:  2020        PMID: 33054504     DOI: 10.1177/0022034520962751

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Res        ISSN: 0022-0345            Impact factor:   6.116


  1 in total

1.  Do sample size calculations in longitudinal orthodontic trials use the advantages of this study design?

Authors:  Samer Mheissen; Jadbinder Seehra; Haris Khan; Nikolaos Pandis
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 2.684

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.