Literature DB >> 33053431

Medical assistant health coaching ("MAC") for type 2 diabetes in diverse primary care settings: A pragmatic, cluster-randomized controlled trial protocol.

Addie L Fortmann1, Athena Philis-Tsimikas2, Johanna A Euyoque3, Taylor L Clark4, Daniela G Vital5, Haley Sandoval6, Julia I Bravin7, Kimberly L Savin8, Jennifer A Jones9, Scott Roesch10, Todd Gilmer11, Thomas Bodenheimer12, James Schultz13, Linda C Gallo14.   

Abstract

In the US, nearly 11% of adults were living with diagnosed diabetes in 2017, and significant type 2 diabetes (T2D) disparities are experienced by socioeconomically disadvantaged, racial/ethnic minority populations, including Hispanics. The standard 15-min primary care visit does not allow for the ongoing self-management support that is needed to meet the complex needs of individuals with diabetes. "Team-based" chronic care delivery is an alternative approach that supplements physician care with contact from allied health personnel in the primary care setting (e.g., medical assistants; MAs) who are specially trained to provide ongoing self-management support or "health coaching." While rigorous trials have shown MA health coaching to improve diabetes outcomes, less is known about if and how such a model can be integrated within real world, primary care clinic workflows. Medical Assistant Health Coaching for Type 2 Diabetes in Diverse Primary Care Settings - A Pragmatic, Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial will address this gap. Specifically, this study compares MA health coaching versus usual care in improving diabetes clinical control among N = 600 at-risk adults with T2D, and is being conducted at four primary care clinics that are part of two health systems that serve large, ethnically/racially, and socioeconomically diverse populations in Southern California. Electronic medical records are used to identify eligible patients at both health systems, and to examine change in clinical control over one year in the overall sample. Changes in behavioral and psychosocial outcomes are being evaluated by telephone assessment in a subset (n = 300) of participants, and rigorous process and cost evaluations will assess potential for sustainability and scalability.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Glycemic control; Health coaching; Pragmatic; Type 2 diabetes

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33053431      PMCID: PMC8093013          DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106164

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  65 in total

1.  Process mapping the patient journey: an introduction.

Authors:  Timothy M Trebble; Navjyot Hansi; Theresa Hydes; Melissa A Smith; Marc Baker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-08-13

2.  Development and testing of a short form of the patient activation measure.

Authors:  Judith H Hibbard; Eldon R Mahoney; Jean Stockard; Martin Tusler
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Crossing the quality chasm for diabetes care: the power of one physician, his team, and systems thinking.

Authors:  Leif I Solberg; David H Klevan; Stephen E Asche
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.657

4.  The validity and reliability of a Spanish version of the summary of diabetes self-care activities questionnaire.

Authors:  Deborah Vincent; Marylyn M McEwen; Alice Pasvogel
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  What Happens After Health Coaching? Observational Study 1 Year Following a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Anjana E Sharma; Rachel Willard-Grace; Danielle Hessler; Thomas Bodenheimer; David H Thom
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 5.166

6.  Development of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM): conceptualizing and measuring activation in patients and consumers.

Authors:  Judith H Hibbard; Jean Stockard; Eldon R Mahoney; Martin Tusler
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Designing a valid randomized pragmatic primary care implementation trial: the my own health report (MOHR) project.

Authors:  Alex H Krist; Beth A Glenn; Russell E Glasgow; Bijal A Balasubramanian; David A Chambers; Maria E Fernandez; Suzanne Heurtin-Roberts; Rodger Kessler; Marcia G Ory; Siobhan M Phillips; Debra P Ritzwoller; Dylan H Roby; Hector P Rodriguez; Roy T Sabo; Sherri N Sheinfeld Gorin; Kurt C Stange
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 7.327

8.  The prevalence of meeting A1C, blood pressure, and LDL goals among people with diabetes, 1988-2010.

Authors:  Sarah Stark Casagrande; Judith E Fradkin; Sharon H Saydah; Keith F Rust; Catherine C Cowie
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  Development of physical and mental health summary scores from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) global items.

Authors:  Ron D Hays; Jakob B Bjorner; Dennis A Revicki; Karen L Spritzer; David Cella
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-06-19       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Validation of the Spanish translation of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) survey.

Authors:  Abraham Aragones; Eric W Schaefer; David Stevens; Marc N Gourevitch; Russell E Glasgow; Nirav R Shah
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 2.830

View more
  1 in total

1.  Process evaluation of a medical assistant health coaching intervention for type 2 diabetes in diverse primary care settings.

Authors:  Taylor L Clark; Addie L Fortmann; Athena Philis-Tsimikas; Thomas Bodenheimer; Kimberly L Savin; Haley Sandoval; Julia I Bravin; Linda C Gallo
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 3.046

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.