Literature DB >> 33053382

The motivational valence of methamphetamine relates inversely to subsequent methamphetamine self-administration in female C57BL/6J mice.

Gabriella Shab1, Elissa K Fultz1, Ariana Page1, Michal A Coelho1, Lindsey W Brewin1, Nicholas Stailey1, Chelsea N Brown1, Camron D Bryant2, Tod E Kippin3, Karen K Szumlinski4.   

Abstract

Understanding the mechanisms underpinning individual variance in addiction vulnerability requires the development of validated, high-throughput screens. In a prior study of a large sample of male isogenic C57BL/6J mice, the direction and magnitude of methamphetamine (MA)-induced place-conditioning predicts the propensity to acquire oral MA self-administration, as well as the efficacy of MA to serve as a reinforcer. The present study examined whether or not such a predictive relationship also exists in females. Adult C57BL/6J females underwent a 4-day MA place-conditioning paradigm (once daily injections of 2 mg/kg) and were then trained to nose-poke for delivery of a 20 mg/L MA solution under increasing schedules of reinforcement, followed by dose-response testing (5-400 mg/L MA). Akin to males, 53 % of the females exhibited a conditioned place-preference, while 32 % of the mice were MA-neutral and 15 % exhibited a conditioned place-aversion. However, unlike males, the place-conditioning phenotype did not transfer to MA-reinforced nose-poking behavior under operant-conditioning procedures, with 400 mg/L MA intake being inversely correlated place-conditioning. While only one MA-conditioning dose has been assayed to date, these data indicate that sex does not significantly shift the proportion of C57BL/6J mice that perceive MA's interoceptive effects as positive, neutral or aversive. However, a sex difference appears to exist regarding the predictive relationship between the motivational valence of MA and subsequent drug-taking behavior; females exhibit MA-taking behavior and reinforcement, despite their initial perception of the stimulant interoceptive effects as positive, neutral or negative.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Addiction vulnerability; Conditioned place-preference; Methamphetamine; Resiliency; Self-administration; Sex differences

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33053382      PMCID: PMC7722188          DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2020.112959

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  87 in total

1.  Sex differences in escalation of methamphetamine self-administration: cognitive and motivational consequences in rats.

Authors:  Carmela M Reichel; Clifford H Chan; Shannon M Ghee; Ronald E See
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 2.  Opponent process model and psychostimulant addiction.

Authors:  G F Koob; S B Caine; L Parsons; A Markou; F Weiss
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.533

3.  Extended heroin access increases heroin choices over a potent nondrug alternative.

Authors:  Magalie Lenoir; Lauriane Cantin; Nathalie Vanhille; Fuschia Serre; Serge H Ahmed
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 4.  Modeling the diagnostic criteria for alcohol dependence with genetic animal models.

Authors:  John C Crabbe; Kenneth S Kendler; Robert J Hitzemann
Journal:  Curr Top Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013

5.  Differential effects of amphetamines-induced neurotoxicity on appetitive and aversive Pavlovian conditioning in mice.

Authors:  Cindy Achat-Mendes; Syed F Ali; Yossef Itzhak
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 6.  Recent advances in animal models of alcohol craving and relapse.

Authors:  Zachary A Rodd; Richard L Bell; Helen J K Sable; James M Murphy; William J McBride
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.533

Review 7.  Opponent process theory of motivation: neurobiological evidence from studies of opiate dependence.

Authors:  G F Koob; L Stinus; M Le Moal; F E Bloom
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  1989 Summer-Fall       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  Preclinical Assessment of Lisdexamfetamine as an Agonist Medication Candidate for Cocaine Addiction: Effects in Rhesus Monkeys Trained to Discriminate Cocaine or to Self-Administer Cocaine in a Cocaine Versus Food Choice Procedure.

Authors:  Matthew L Banks; Blake A Hutsell; Bruce E Blough; Justin L Poklis; S Stevens Negus
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 5.176

9.  The methamphetamine problem: Commentary on … Psychiatric morbidity and socio-occupational dysfunction in residents of a drug rehabilitation centre.

Authors:  Niall Galbraith
Journal:  BJPsych Bull       Date:  2015-10

10.  Sex Differences in the Reinstatement of Methamphetamine Seeking after Forced Abstinence in Sprague-Dawley Rats.

Authors:  Jana Ruda-Kucerova; Petra Amchova; Zuzana Babinska; Ladislav Dusek; Vincenzo Micale; Alexandra Sulcova
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 4.157

View more
  1 in total

1.  ERK-Directed Phosphorylation of mGlu5 Gates Methamphetamine Reward and Reinforcement in Mouse.

Authors:  Elissa K Fultz; Sema G Quadir; Douglas Martin; Daniel M Flaherty; Paul F Worley; Tod E Kippin; Karen K Szumlinski
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 5.923

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.