Alan C Braverman1, Eric Mittauer2, Kevin M Harris3, Arturo Evangelista4, Reed E Pyeritz5, Derek Brinster6, Lori Conklin7, Toru Suzuki8, Christina Fanola9, Maral Ouzounian10, Edward Chen11, Truls Myrmel12, Raffi Bekeredjian13, Stuart Hutchison14, Joseph Coselli15, Dan Gilon16, Patrick O'Gara17,18, Melinda Davis19, Eric Isselbacher20, Kim Eagle19. 1. Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri. 2. Medical student, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri. 3. Minneapolis Heart Institute at Abbott-Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota. 4. University Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain. 5. Division of Translational Medicine and Human Genetics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. 6. Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell Health, New York, New York. 7. Department of Anesthesiology, University of Virginia Medical School, Charlottesville. 8. Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom. 9. Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis. 10. Department of Surgery University of Toronto, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 11. Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia. 12. Department of Clinical Medicine, Tromsø University Hospital, Tromsø, Norway. 13. University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. 14. Libin Cardiovascular Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. 15. Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas. 16. Department of Cardiology, Hadassah University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel. 17. Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 18. Deputy Editor, JAMA Cardiology. 19. Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor. 20. Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Abstract
Importance: Women with aortopathy conditions are at risk for pregnancy-related aortic dissection, and these conditions may not be recognized until after the aortic dissection occurs. Objective: To examine the clinical characteristics, imaging features, and outcomes in women with pregnancy-related acute aortic dissection. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cohort study, comprising data from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD) (February 1, 1998, to February 28, 2018). The multicenter referral center study included 29 women with aortic dissection during pregnancy or less than 12 weeks post partum in IRAD from 1998 to 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: Clinical features of pregnancy-related aortic dissection to be studied included underlying aortopathy, aortic size, type of aortic dissection, timing of dissection, hypertension, and previous aortic surgery. Results: A total of 29 women (mean [SD] age, 32 [6] years) had pregnancy-related aortic dissection, representing 0.3% of all aortic dissections and 1% of aortic dissection in women in the IRAD. Among women younger than 35 years, aortic dissection was related to pregnancy in 20 of 105 women (19%). Thirteen women (45%) had type A aortic dissection, and 16 women (55%) had type B. Aortic dissection onset was known in 27 women (93%): 15 during pregnancy, 4 in the first trimester, and 11 in the third trimester; 12 were post partum, occurring a mean (SD) of 12.5 (14) days post partum. At type A aortic dissection diagnosis, the mean (SD) aortic diameters were sinus of Valsalva, 54.5 (5) mm and ascending aorta, 54.7 (6) mm. At type B aortic dissection diagnosis, the mean (SD) descending aortic diameter was 32.5 (5) mm. Twenty women (69%) had an aortopathy condition or a positive family history: 13 women (65%) with Marfan syndrome, 2 women (10%) with Loeys-Dietz syndrome, 2 women (10%) with bicuspid aortic valves, 2 women (10%) with a family history of aortic disease, and 1 woman (5%) with familial thoracic aortic aneurysm. Aortopathy was not recognized until after aortic dissection in 47% of the women. Twenty-eight women (97%) survived aortic dissection hospitalization. Conclusions and Relevance: Aortic dissection complicating pregnancy is rare. Most pregnancy-related aortic dissection is due to an aortopathy often not diagnosed until after aortic dissection. In this study, type A aortic dissections were associated with a dilated aorta, and type B aortic dissections often were not. Recognition of underlying conditions and risks for aortic dissection may improve management of pregnancy in women with aortopathy.
Importance: Women with aortopathy conditions are at risk for pregnancy-related aortic dissection, and these conditions may not be recognized until after the aortic dissection occurs. Objective: To examine the clinical characteristics, imaging features, and outcomes in women with pregnancy-related acute aortic dissection. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cohort study, comprising data from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD) (February 1, 1998, to February 28, 2018). The multicenter referral center study included 29 women with aortic dissection during pregnancy or less than 12 weeks post partum in IRAD from 1998 to 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: Clinical features of pregnancy-related aortic dissection to be studied included underlying aortopathy, aortic size, type of aortic dissection, timing of dissection, hypertension, and previous aortic surgery. Results: A total of 29 women (mean [SD] age, 32 [6] years) had pregnancy-related aortic dissection, representing 0.3% of all aortic dissections and 1% of aortic dissection in women in the IRAD. Among women younger than 35 years, aortic dissection was related to pregnancy in 20 of 105 women (19%). Thirteen women (45%) had type A aortic dissection, and 16 women (55%) had type B. Aortic dissection onset was known in 27 women (93%): 15 during pregnancy, 4 in the first trimester, and 11 in the third trimester; 12 were post partum, occurring a mean (SD) of 12.5 (14) days post partum. At type A aortic dissection diagnosis, the mean (SD) aortic diameters were sinus of Valsalva, 54.5 (5) mm and ascending aorta, 54.7 (6) mm. At type B aortic dissection diagnosis, the mean (SD) descending aortic diameter was 32.5 (5) mm. Twenty women (69%) had an aortopathy condition or a positive family history: 13 women (65%) with Marfan syndrome, 2 women (10%) with Loeys-Dietz syndrome, 2 women (10%) with bicuspid aortic valves, 2 women (10%) with a family history of aortic disease, and 1 woman (5%) with familial thoracic aortic aneurysm. Aortopathy was not recognized until after aortic dissection in 47% of the women. Twenty-eight women (97%) survived aortic dissection hospitalization. Conclusions and Relevance: Aortic dissection complicating pregnancy is rare. Most pregnancy-related aortic dissection is due to an aortopathy often not diagnosed until after aortic dissection. In this study, type A aortic dissections were associated with a dilated aorta, and type B aortic dissections often were not. Recognition of underlying conditions and risks for aortic dissection may improve management of pregnancy in women with aortopathy.
Authors: Kathryn J Lindley; C Noel Bairey Merz; Anita W Asgar; Natalie A Bello; Sonal Chandra; Melinda B Davis; Mardi Gomberg-Maitland; Martha Gulati; Lisa M Hollier; Eric V Krieger; Ki Park; Candice Silversides; Natasha K Wolfe; Carl J Pepine Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2021-04-13 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Dianna M Milewicz; Alan C Braverman; Julie De Backer; Shaine A Morris; Catherine Boileau; Irene H Maumenee; Guillaume Jondeau; Arturo Evangelista; Reed E Pyeritz Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2021-09-02 Impact factor: 65.038