Literature DB >> 33051814

Is the only buccal infiltration anesthesia enough for extraction of mandibular anterior incisors and premolar teeth? A split-mouth randomized clinical trial.

Bilal Ege1, Mehmet Demirkol2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The issue of needing additional lingual injection in extractions of mandibular premolar and incisors is still not clarified. The aim of this study is to investigate whether it is necessary to perform lingual injection in addition to buccal infiltration anesthesia in mandibular incisors and premolar teeth extractions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-six patients who admitted to our clinic for the removal of bilateral mandibular anterior teeth were included in the present study. Patients were divided into two groups. The experimental group received only 1.5 ml of 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine by injection into the buccal vestibule of the tooth. The control group received 1.5 ml of 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine by buccal injection into the buccal side and 0.3 ml same lidocaine solution injected into the lingual side of the tooth. After 5 min, tooth was extracted and each patient was asked to record the intensity of injection and extraction pain by 0-100 mm and a 10-point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and six-pointed Face Pain Scale (FPS).
RESULTS: The injection pain scores were significantly higher in terms of the VAS 0-10 point and 0-100 mm and FPS in the control group to which additional lingual injections were applied than the experimental group (p < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were found in all three scales between the groups in terms of extraction pain (p > 0.05). The mean extraction pain scores were lower in the experimental group according to the three scales. No additional anesthetic injection and post-operative complications were observed in all patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The extraction of mandibular incisors and premolar teeth can only be done with only the buccal infiltration. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In the extraction of mandibular anterior teeth, it can be performed with less anesthetic amount without the need for an additional lingual injection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lingual injection; Mandible; Supplemental local anesthesia; Tooth extraction

Year:  2020        PMID: 33051814     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-020-03628-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  3 in total

1.  Comparison of articaine and prilocaine anesthesia by infiltration in maxillary and mandibular arches.

Authors:  D A Haas; D G Harper; M A Saso; E R Young
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct

2.  Extraction of permanent maxillary teeth by only buccal infiltration of articaine.

Authors:  Anand Vijay Somuri; A Bhagavandas Rai; Manju Pillai
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2012-08-24

3.  Influence of local anesthethics with adrenalina 1:100.000 in basic vital constants during third molar surgery.

Authors:  Ricardo José de Holanda Vasconcellos; Belmiro Cavalcanti do Egito Vasconcelos; Paloma Rodrigues Genú
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2008-07-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.