Literature DB >> 33051795

147 Pancreatoduodenectomies: a Single Center's Perspective into the Epidemiology and Surgical Outcomes of Periampullary and Pancreatic Cancers in South India.

Souradeep Dutta1, Thirthar Palanivelu Elamurugan2, Biswajit Dubashi3, Karunanithi Gunaseelan4, Ankit Jain1, Reddy Abhinaya1, Vishnu Prasad Nelamangala Ramakrishnaiah5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is the only curative procedure for resectable periampullary cancers. This study aims to survey the various outcome variables of the procedure at our institute, which is in the early process of evolving into a high-volume center for PDs.
METHODS: Data of patients, who underwent PDs, was collected retrospectively from January 2010 to December 2017 and prospectively from January 2018 to December 2019. Various preoperative, intraoperative, and histopathological parameters were compared with the outcome variables-morbidity and mortality rates.
RESULTS: A total of 147 patients underwent PDs over the last decade. From January 2010 to December 2014 (period A), 29 patients underwent PD, while 118 patients underwent PD from January 2015 to December 2019 (period B). Clinically relevant (CR) delayed gastric emptying (44.8% vs 23.7%), CR post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage (37.9% vs 18.6%), and blood loss (850 ml (400-5300 ml) vs 600 ml (150-2500 ml)) improved in period B with no improvement in CR postoperative pancreatic fistula (20.7% vs 28.8%). The rates of SSI (63.6%), pulmonary complications (29.9%), and mean postoperative stay (19.87 ± 11.59 days) were found to be higher than most of the major centers. Mortality rates decreased significantly from 27.6% in period A to 10.2% in period B (p = 0.029). Median overall survival was 30 months (95% CI 20.76-39.23 months)
CONCLUSION: Over the last decade, there has been a significant improvement in the mortality rate, but morbidity remains high and must be looked into as the department enters the new decade as a young high-volume center.
© 2020. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Pancreatoduodenectomy; Whipple surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33051795     DOI: 10.1007/s12029-020-00534-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer


  13 in total

1.  1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: A single-institution experience.

Authors:  Jordan M Winter; John L Cameron; Kurtis A Campbell; Meghan A Arnold; David C Chang; Joann Coleman; Mary B Hodgin; Patricia K Sauter; Ralph H Hruban; Taylor S Riall; Richard D Schulick; Michael A Choti; Keith D Lillemoe; Charles J Yeo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies.

Authors:  John L Cameron; Taylor S Riall; JoAnn Coleman; Kenneth A Belcher
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS).

Authors:  Moritz N Wente; Claudio Bassi; Christos Dervenis; Abe Fingerhut; Dirk J Gouma; Jakob R Izbicki; John P Neoptolemos; Robert T Padbury; Michael G Sarr; L William Traverso; Charles J Yeo; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 4.  The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After.

Authors:  Claudio Bassi; Giovanni Marchegiani; Christos Dervenis; Micheal Sarr; Mohammad Abu Hilal; Mustapha Adham; Peter Allen; Roland Andersson; Horacio J Asbun; Marc G Besselink; Kevin Conlon; Marco Del Chiaro; Massimo Falconi; Laureano Fernandez-Cruz; Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo; Abe Fingerhut; Helmut Friess; Dirk J Gouma; Thilo Hackert; Jakob Izbicki; Keith D Lillemoe; John P Neoptolemos; Attila Olah; Richard Schulick; Shailesh V Shrikhande; Tadahiro Takada; Kyoichi Takaori; William Traverso; Charles R Vollmer; Christopher L Wolfgang; Charles J Yeo; Roberto Salvia; Marcus Buchler
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  A matched case-control study of preoperative biliary drainage in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma: routine drainage is not justified.

Authors:  James J Mezhir; Murray F Brennan; Raymond E Baser; Michael I D'Angelica; Yuman Fong; Ronald P DeMatteo; William R Jarnagin; Peter J Allen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Preoperative biliary drainage in resectable pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Peter J Lee; Amareshwar Podugu; Dong Wu; Arier C Lee; Tyler Stevens; John A Windsor
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 3.647

7.  Haemorrhagic complications of pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Palat Balachandran; Sadiq S Sikora; Rachapoodi V Raghavendra Rao; Ashok Kumar; Rajan Saxena; Vinay K Kapoor
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.872

Review 8.  Epidemiology of digestive tract cancers in India IV. Gall bladder and pancreas.

Authors:  V Dhir; K M Mohandas
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  1999 Jan-Mar

Review 9.  Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition.

Authors:  Moritz N Wente; Johannes A Veit; Claudio Bassi; Christos Dervenis; Abe Fingerhut; Dirk J Gouma; Jakob R Izbicki; John P Neoptolemos; Robert T Padbury; Michael G Sarr; Charles J Yeo; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  Whipple resection: The need for specialization, standardization and centralization.

Authors:  Shailesh V Shrikhande
Journal:  South Asian J Cancer       Date:  2013-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.