Literature DB >> 33049415

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in children with pediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome temporally associated with SARS-CoV-2 and heart dysfunction.

Luis M Prieto1, Belén Toral2, Ana LLorente3, David Coca4, Daniel Blázquez-Gamero5.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33049415      PMCID: PMC7547828          DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.10.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect        ISSN: 1198-743X            Impact factor:   8.067


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor, The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) appears to affect proportionally fewer children than adults and with a less severe clinical presentation. However, during the COVID-19 pandemic, a new childhood disorder has emerged worldwide characterized by fever, elevated inflammatory markers, and organ dysfunction [1,2]. A case definition was published in April 2020 by The Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health in the United Kingdom, and was named “pediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome temporally associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)”, or PIMS-TS. World Health Organization (WHO) and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have subsequently also published their own case definitions. We describe the recent experience with five patients affected by this condition from April 28 to May 11, 2020. All were previously healthy children, with a median age of 7 years old, [interquartile range (IQR), 5-12 years]. They presented at admission with fever, tachycardia and hypotension. The median white cell count was 9100 cells/mm3 (IQR: 7700-9660) and the median lymphocytes count was 1700 cells/mm3 (IQR: 610-1760). Other ancillary tests revealed elevated cardiac biomarkers [median troponin T was 66.6 ng/l (IQR: 3.2-75.2) and NT-proBNP of 14,407 pg/ml (IQR: 3988–16,150)], and markedly increased inflammatory biomarkers like C-reactive protein and procalcitonin [10.2 mg/dl (IQR: 9.4-26.9) and 10.5 ng/ml (IQR: 3.4-14.8), respectively]. The median ferritin was 421 μg/l (IQR: 369-639) and the median interleukin 6 was 63.5 pg/ml (IQR: 27.2-216.2). The echocardiography revealed mild to moderate heart dysfunction in all of the patients (Table 1 ). All of them had a positive serology against SARS-CoV-2 (Ig anti receptor-binding domain) and met criteria for PIMS-TS according to UK, WHO and CDC definitions.
Table 1

Demographic, clinical characteristics, ancillary tests, treatmenta and outcomes of children with PIMS-TS and heart dysfunction

VariablePatient 1Patient 2Patient 3Patient 4Patient 5
Demographics and epidemiology
Age (years)695712
SexMaleMaleFemaleFemaleMale
EthnicitySub-Saharan AfricanArabicHispanicCaucasianCaucasian
Medical historyHealthyPsoriasisHealthyHealthyTonsillectomy
Family cluster of SARS-CoV-2 infectionNoYesYesYesYes
Signs and symptoms at admission
Temperature (°C)40.338.540.239.340.7
Days of fever before admission (>38°C)57565
RashYesYesYesNoYes
Distribution of the rashThorax, arms and legsHands and feetPalms, thorax and legsPalms
ConjunctivitisYesYesYesYesNo
LymphadenitisNoNoNoNoNo
LipsNormalCracked lipsNormalNormalNormal
TongueNormalNormalNormalNormalNormal
Abdominal painYesYesYesYesYes
DiarrheaNoYesYesYesYes
CoughNoNoNoNoYes
Oxygen saturation (%)8797959895
Heart rate (bpm)125182130116112
Blood pressure (mmHg)86/4475/4288/4690/5087/38
Image and heart evaluation
Chest X-raysMild left pulmonary infiltrateNormalNormalNormalNormal
Echocardiography (at admission

Mild systolic disfunction (LVEF 52%)

Moderate systolic disfunction (LVEF 40%)

Moderate systolic disfunction (LVEF:40%)

Moderate systolic disfunction (LVEF: 40%)

Mild systolic disfunction (LVEF 50%)

Diastolic dysfunction

Diastolic dysfunction

Diastolic dysfunction

Normal coronary arteries: LCA 2.7mm (z score +0.2) and RCA 2.5mm (z score +0.4).

Normal coronary arteries: LCA: 3,8mm (z score +0.6), RCA: 3,4mm (z score +0.5).

Normal coronary arteries: LCA 2,4mm (z score -1.6) and RCA 2,3mm (z score -1).

Normal coronary arteries: LCA 2,8mm (z score 0), LAD 2,8mm (z score: +1.5) and RCA 2.5mm (z score 0).

Severe mitral regurgitation and moderate tricuspid regurgitation

Normal coronary arteries: LCA 2,9mm (z score +1.4), LAD 2,2mm (z score +1), RCA 2,7mm (z score +1.5).

Electrocardiogram

Normal

Repolarization abnormalities

Normal

Repolarization abnormalities

Normal

TreatmentDopamineDopamineCeftriaxoneCeftriaxoneNorepinephrine
NorepinephrineCefotaximeClindamycinIVIG (2gr/kg)Amoxicillin-clavulanate
CeftriaxoneIVIG (2 gr/kg)IVIG (2gr/kg)Steroids (2 mg/kg)IVIG (2gr/kg)
IVIG (2 gr/kg)Steroids (2 mg/kg)
Steroids (2 mg/kg)
Hydroxychloroquine
Azithromycin
PICU admissionYesYesYesNoYes
Respiratory support/oxygen therapyBiPAPNasal cannulaNasal cannulaNasal cannula
Outcome
EchocardiographyComplete resolution of abnormalities on day 7 of admission. LVEF 70%. Normal coronary arteries.Complete resolution of abnormalities on day 5 of admission. LVEF 55%. Normal coronary arteries.Evaluation on day 6 of admission. Mild tricuspid regurgitation. Resolution of mitral regurgitation. LVEF 60%. Normal coronary arteriesComplete resolution of abnormalities on day 5 of admission. LVEF 70%. Normal coronary arteriesComplete resolution of abnormalities on day 8 of admission. LVEF 70%. Normal coronary arteries
Cardiovascular Magnetic ResonanceLVEF 60% (EDV 76 ml/m2)RVEF 57% (EDV 84 ml/m2)No myocardial edema or enhancement abnormalitiesLVEF 65% (EDV 78 ml/m2)RVEF 69% (EDV 83 ml/m2)No myocardial edema or enhancement abnormalitiesLVEF 57% (EDV 70 ml/m2)RVEF 57% (EDV 73 ml/m2). Mild trycuspid regurgitation.No myocardial edema or enhancement abnormalitiesLVEF 66% (EDV 64 ml/m2)RVEF 67% (EDV 63 ml/m2)No myocardial edema or enhancement abnormalitiesLVEF 66% (EDV 64 ml/m2)RVEF 67% (EDV 63 ml/m2)No myocardial edema or enhancement abnormalities

BiPAP, Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure; LAD, Left Anterior Descending; EDV, End-Diastolic Volume; IVIG, Intravenous Immunoglobulin; LCA: Left Coronary Artery; LVEF, Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction; ND, not done; PICU, Pediatric Intensive Care Unit;; RCA: Right Coronary Artery; RVEF: Right Ventricular Ejection Fraction.

Z-score for coronary artery diameters was assessed according to: Dallaire F, Dahdah N. New equations and a critical appraisal of coronary artery Z scores in healthy children. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011 Jan; 24:60-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2010.10.004.

Demographic, clinical characteristics, ancillary tests, treatmenta and outcomes of children with PIMS-TS and heart dysfunction Mild systolic disfunction (LVEF 52%) Moderate systolic disfunction (LVEF 40%) Moderate systolic disfunction (LVEF:40%) Moderate systolic disfunction (LVEF: 40%) Mild systolic disfunction (LVEF 50%) Diastolic dysfunction Diastolic dysfunction Diastolic dysfunction Normal coronary arteries: LCA 2.7mm (z score +0.2) and RCA 2.5mm (z score +0.4). Normal coronary arteries: LCA: 3,8mm (z score +0.6), RCA: 3,4mm (z score +0.5). Normal coronary arteries: LCA 2,4mm (z score -1.6) and RCA 2,3mm (z score -1). Normal coronary arteries: LCA 2,8mm (z score 0), LAD 2,8mm (z score: +1.5) and RCA 2.5mm (z score 0). Severe mitral regurgitation and moderate tricuspid regurgitation Normal coronary arteries: LCA 2,9mm (z score +1.4), LAD 2,2mm (z score +1), RCA 2,7mm (z score +1.5). Normal Repolarization abnormalities Normal Repolarization abnormalities Normal BiPAP, Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure; LAD, Left Anterior Descending; EDV, End-Diastolic Volume; IVIG, Intravenous Immunoglobulin; LCA: Left Coronary Artery; LVEF, Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction; ND, not done; PICU, Pediatric Intensive Care Unit;; RCA: Right Coronary Artery; RVEF: Right Ventricular Ejection Fraction. Z-score for coronary artery diameters was assessed according to: Dallaire F, Dahdah N. New equations and a critical appraisal of coronary artery Z scores in healthy children. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011 Jan; 24:60-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2010.10.004. They received IGIV, and in three cases steroids were added because of persistent fever 48 hours after IVIG administration. They were discharged home with total recovery of the heart function. The exact mechanisms of how SARS-CoV-2 causes this transient myocardial dysfunction in children with PIMS-TS are not well understood. During the last decade, cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) has become the diagnostic tool of choice for patients with evidence for acute nonischemic myocardial injury, including myocarditis. The largest pediatric study assessing the role of CMRI in myocarditis included 143 children and young adults up to 21 years old. CMRI abnormalities were identified most commonly with late gadolinium enhancement. Based on CMRI features 117 children (82%) were interpreted as positive for myocarditis, 18 as negative (13%) and equivocal in 7 (5%) [3]. CMRI allows for targeting several features of myocardial injury: inflammatory hyperemia and edema, necrosis/scar, contractile dysfunction and pericardial effusion. CMRI is also a predictor of functional and clinical recovery. In summary, on the basis of available research, CMRI allows for a robust assessment of the extent of injury and dysfunction in clinically acute scenarios of myocardial injury [4]. However, the diagnostic value of echocardiography for myocardial injury is limited by the fact that many patients with less severe disease have a normal echocardiogram and the highly variable echocardiographic findings lack specificity. A cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) was performed after discharge [median day after admission: +16, (9-17)]. The protocol performed included steady-state free precession cine 2D sequences (short axis, 4, 3 and 2 Chamber views); study of edema (Inversion Recovery sequence in short axis), hyperemia and capillary leak (early gadolinium enhancement) and myocyte necrosis and fibrosis (late gadolinium enhancement). Both ventricles had normal function and no edema or abnormalities in early and late gadolinium enhancement were observed in any cases. CMRI did not show any myocardial damage in this series. CMRI is considered a highly sensitive technique to evaluate myocardial injury. Although the number of patients in this series was small, heart dysfunction did not seem secondary to myocardial viral injury in these children. An alternative hypothesis is that the exaggerated inflammatory response observed in these children with PIMS-TS could be the cause of the heart dysfunction [5]. The rapid recovery of the heart function after immunomodulatory treatment and the absence of myocardial abnormalities in CMRI support this hypothesis. Studies to further elucidate the cause of myocardial dysfunction in children with multisystem inflammatory syndrome related to COVID-19 are warranted.

Author contributions

LP, DB, AL, DC and BT had full access to all of the data in the study and take the responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. ALL authors contributed equally in writing the paper and approved the final manuscript as submitted.

Transparency declaration

Potential conflicts of interest

No conflicts of interest.

Funding

There was not funding source for any of the authors.
  8 in total

Review 1.  Cardio-thoracic imaging and COVID-19 in the pediatric population: A narrative review.

Authors:  Paolo Ferrero; Isabelle Piazza
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2021-04-28

2.  Editorial for "Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Follow-Up of Children After Pediatric Inflammatory Multisystem Syndrome Temporally Associated with SARS-CoV-2 (PIMS-TS) and Initial Cardiac Involvement".

Authors:  Gregory Webster; Joshua D Robinson
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 5.119

Review 3.  Cardiac Manifestations of Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C) Following COVID-19.

Authors:  Eveline Y Wu; M Jay Campbell
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 4.  Longitudinal Outcomes and Monitoring of Patients With Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children.

Authors:  Michael A Fremed; Kanwal M Farooqi
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.418

5.  Cardiac Assessment in Children with MIS-C: Late Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features.

Authors:  Sema Yildirim Arslan; Zumrut Sahbudak Bal; Selen Bayraktaroglu; Gizem Guner Ozenen; Nimet Melis Bilen; Erturk Levent; Oguzhan Ay; Pinar Yazici Ozkaya; Ferda Ozkinay; Candan Cicek; Akin Cinkooglu; Guzide Aksu; Gunes Ak; Zafer Kurugol
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 1.838

Review 6.  Multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS-C): a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcomes.

Authors:  Mônica O Santos; Lucas C Gonçalves; Paulo A N Silva; André L E Moreira; Célia R M Ito; Fernanda A O Peixoto; Isabela J Wastowski; Lilian C Carneiro; Melissa A G Avelino
Journal:  J Pediatr (Rio J)       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 2.990

7.  Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Follow-Up of Children After Pediatric Inflammatory Multisystem Syndrome Temporally Associated With SARS-CoV-2 With Initial Cardiac Involvement.

Authors:  Marta Bartoszek; Łukasz A Małek; Marzena Barczuk-Falęcka; Michał Brzewski
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 5.119

Review 8.  Coronavirus Disease 2019-Related Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ji-Gan Wang; Zhi-Juan Zhong; Meng Li; Jun Fu; Yu-Heng Su; You-Min Ping; Zi-Ji Xu; Hao Li; Yan-Hao Chen; Yu-Li Huang
Journal:  Biochem Res Int       Date:  2021-07-15
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.