| Literature DB >> 33048970 |
Viyan Rashid1, Peter J M Weijs1,2, Marielle F Engberink1, Arnoud P Verhoeff3,4, Mary Nicolaou5.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We examined whether the role of maternal education in children's unhealthy snacking diet is moderated by other socio-economic indicators.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33048970 PMCID: PMC7553270 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240423
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Flow-chart of the sampling procedure of the ABCD cohort (n = 2782).
Socio-economic characteristics of the study population by maternal education (n = 2766).
| Population | Population by maternal education n = 2766 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristics | low n = 287 (10.4%) | middle-high n = 552 (20.0%) | high n = 1927 (69.6%) | |||
| Mean, SD | 5.83 | (0.52) | 5.75 | (0.50) | 5.67 | (0.47) |
| Boys, n (%) | 154 | (50.7) | 280 | (50.7) | 980 | (50.9) |
| Dutch, n (%) | 140 | (48.8) | 390 | (70.7) | 1750 | (90.8) |
| Surinamese, n (%) | 23 | (8.0) | 58 | (10.5) | 35 | (1.8) |
| Turkish, n (%) | 31 | (10.8) | 20 | (3.6) | 9 | (0.5) |
| Moroccan, n (%) | 48 | (16.7) | 42 | (7.6) | 20 | (1.0) |
| Other ethnicities, n (%) | 45 | (15.7) | 42 | (7.6) | 113 | (5.9) |
| Low, n (%) | 51 | (44.0) | 42 | (13.8) | 48 | (3.5) |
| Middle, n (%) | 39 | (33.6) | 118 | (38.7) | 181 | (13.1) |
| High, n (%) | 26 | (22.4) | 145 | (47.5) | 1149 | (83.4) |
| Low, n (%) | 191 | (68.0) | 243 | (44.7) | 468 | (24.5) |
| High, n (%) | 90 | (32.0) | 301 | (55.3) | 1443 | (75.5) |
| Mean, SD | -0.727 | 1.24 | -0.069 | 1.28 | 0.500 | 1.15 |
| Mean, SD | 0.992 | 1.11 | 0.329 | 1.01 | -0.246 | 0.84 |
Maternal education was based on the highest education completed. Increasing neighbourhood SES scores represent higher neighbourhood SES and positive snacking pattern scores indicate higher consumption of food groups in that pattern.
* Sign (P<0.01) is significant with all groups and based on ANOVA and Post-hoc Bonferroni.
Associations between maternal education, different SES indicators and the snacking pattern score (n = 2782).
| B (95%-CI) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maternal education | Paternal education | Household finance | Neighbourhood SES | |||
| Low | middle-high | Low | middle-high | Low | continuously | |
| Model 1: maternal education | 0.946 (0.829; 1.064) | 0.438 (0.352; 0.524) | ||||
| Model 2: paternal education | 0.725 (0.547; 0.903) | 0.292 (0.183; 0.401) | 0.359 (0.198; 0.519) | 0.216 (0.112; 0.320) | ||
| Model 3: household finance | 0.881 (0.760; 1.002) | 0.416 (0.329; 0.503) | 0.141 (0.050; 0.231) | |||
| Model 4: neighbourhood SES | 0.874 (0.754; 0.994) | 0.406 (0.267; 0.479) | -0.085 (-0.113; -0.057) | |||
| Model 5: all SES factors | 0.673 (0.491; 0.855) | 0.283 (0.173; 0.393) | 0.304 (0.142; 0.466) | 0.199 (0.093; 0.304) | 0.108 (0.022; 0.203) | -0.045 (-0.079; -0.011) |
Maternal education was based on the highest education completed. Values are based on multivariable linear regression and reflect differences (95% CI) in socio economic factors (maternal education, paternal education, household finance and neighbourhood SES) on the snacking pattern score. Model 1: describes the association between maternal education and the snacking pattern score (n = 2766). Model 2: describes the association between maternal education, paternal education and the snacking pattern score (n = 1799). Model 3: describes the association between maternal education, household finance and the snacking pattern score (n = 2736). Model 4: describes the association between maternal education, neighbourhood SES and the snacking pattern score (n = 2738). Model 5: describes the association between all SES factors and the snacking pattern score (n = 1765). All models were adjusted for age, sex and ethnicity.
Effect modification between maternal education and other SES factors, stratified by household finance (n = 2736).
| Low household finance | High household finance | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maternal education | Maternal education | ||||
| low | middle-high | low | middle-high | ||
| Model 1: maternal education | B (95%-CI) | 0.821 (0.641; 1.000) | 0.492 (0.334; 0.651) | 0.982 (0.800; 1.163) | 0.361 (0.258; 0.465) |
| B | 0.298 | 0.194 | 0.241 | 0.152 | |
| Model 5: all SES factors | B (95%-CI) | 0.503 (0.223; 0.782) | 0.303 (0.088; 0.517) | 0.900 (0.624; 1.176) | 0.254 (0.125; 0.384) |
| B | 0.182 | 0.126 | 0.178 | 0.107 | |
Maternal education was based on the highest education completed. Values are based on multivariable linear regression and reflect differences (95%-CI) in socio-economic factors (maternal education, paternal education and neighbourhood SES) on the snacking pattern score. Model 1: describes the association between maternal education and the snacking pattern score in the low and high household finance group (n = 2736). Model 5: describes the association between maternal education, paternal education and neighbourhood SES and the snacking pattern scores in the low and high household finance group (n = 1765). Both models were adjusted for age, sex and ethnicity.