Clara H Lee1,2, Everett G Seay3, James W Reese4, Xin Wu5, Richard J Schwab6, Brendan Keenan6, Raj C Dedhia3,6. 1. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA. 2. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA. 3. Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. 4. Baylor Radiologists: A Radiology Partners Affiliated Practice, Houston, Texas, USA. 5. Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. 6. Division of Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine if clinically acquired cephalometric measurements, specifically soft palate size, can predict hypoglossal nerve stimulation outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Combined prospective cohort study and retrospective review. SETTING: US sleep otolaryngology training program. METHODS: Adults with obstructive sleep apnea and apneahypopnea index greater than 15 events/h who underwent hypoglossal nerve stimulation. Eligible subjects had diagnostic preoperative sleep studies and full-night efficacy postoperative studies for analysis. Lateral neck x-rays were obtained as part of routine clinical care and measured for key cephalometric variables by trained head and neck radiologists. Continuous variables were compared using the Student t test, while χ2 testing was used for categorical variables. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients met all study criteria. On average, patients were white, middle aged, and overweight. Following hypoglossal nerve stimulation, the overall cohort achieved a significant apnea-hypopnea index reduction from 36.7 events/h to 20.6 events/h (P < .01) and a response rate of 47% (defined as apnea-hypopnea index reduction >50% and apnea-hypopnea index <20 events/h). On average, therapy responders had significantly thinner soft palates than nonresponders (13.4 ± 3.8 mm vs 16.0 ± 3.4 mm, P = .045). CONCLUSIONS: Patient-specific anatomic factors, specifically soft palate thickness, may help identify optimal candidates for hypoglossal nerve stimulation. A larger, prospective study including both anatomic and physiologic variables is required to validate these findings.
OBJECTIVE: To determine if clinically acquired cephalometric measurements, specifically soft palate size, can predict hypoglossal nerve stimulation outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Combined prospective cohort study and retrospective review. SETTING: US sleep otolaryngology training program. METHODS: Adults with obstructive sleep apnea and apneahypopnea index greater than 15 events/h who underwent hypoglossal nerve stimulation. Eligible subjects had diagnostic preoperative sleep studies and full-night efficacy postoperative studies for analysis. Lateral neck x-rays were obtained as part of routine clinical care and measured for key cephalometric variables by trained head and neck radiologists. Continuous variables were compared using the Student t test, while χ2 testing was used for categorical variables. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients met all study criteria. On average, patients were white, middle aged, and overweight. Following hypoglossal nerve stimulation, the overall cohort achieved a significant apnea-hypopnea index reduction from 36.7 events/h to 20.6 events/h (P < .01) and a response rate of 47% (defined as apnea-hypopnea index reduction >50% and apnea-hypopnea index <20 events/h). On average, therapy responders had significantly thinner soft palates than nonresponders (13.4 ± 3.8 mm vs 16.0 ± 3.4 mm, P = .045). CONCLUSIONS: Patient-specific anatomic factors, specifically soft palate thickness, may help identify optimal candidates for hypoglossal nerve stimulation. A larger, prospective study including both anatomic and physiologic variables is required to validate these findings.