Takuma Funakoshi1, Takuya Shibata2, Kyoko Inamoto3, Naoki Shibata3, Yoshiko Ariji2, Motoki Fukuda2, Kazuhiko Nakata3, Eiichiro Ariji2. 1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Aichi-Gakuin University School of Dentistry, 2-11 Suemori-dori, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, 464-8651, Japan. funa@dpc.agu.ac.jp. 2. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Aichi-Gakuin University School of Dentistry, 2-11 Suemori-dori, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, 464-8651, Japan. 3. Department of Endodontics, Aichi-Gakuin University School of Dentistry, 2-11 Suemori-dori, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, 464-8651, Japan.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to clarify the relationship between the panoramic radiographic appearance and the longitudinal cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) classification of root configurations of the mandibular second molar. METHODS: Panoramic radiographs of 1058 mandibular second molars were classified into five types according to the number and configuration of the roots. These molars were also examined with CBCT at four levels between the pulp chamber and the root apex, and axial images perpendicular to the root axis were categorized into three patterns: single (fused root with small grooves on both buccal and lingual sides or a round root with one canal); double (two separate roots with a trabecular appearance between them); and C-shaped (root with a deep groove opening only on the lingual or buccal side relative to the opposite side). Based on these patterns and their scan levels, the CBCT root morphology appearance in each tooth unit was classified into seven groups. Relationships were investigated between these seven CBCT groups and the five panoramic root types. RESULTS: In panoramic types 1 and 2 (with separate roots), 85% had roots with a double pattern (groups II and III) on the CBCT images. In panoramic types 3 and 4 (with fused roots), 85% had C-shaped CBCT patterns at the lower scan levels. CONCLUSIONS: When panoramic images show fused root types, CBCT examinations should be planned to clarify the root canal configuration.
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to clarify the relationship between the panoramic radiographic appearance and the longitudinal cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) classification of root configurations of the mandibular second molar. METHODS: Panoramic radiographs of 1058 mandibular second molars were classified into five types according to the number and configuration of the roots. These molars were also examined with CBCT at four levels between the pulp chamber and the root apex, and axial images perpendicular to the root axis were categorized into three patterns: single (fused root with small grooves on both buccal and lingual sides or a round root with one canal); double (two separate roots with a trabecular appearance between them); and C-shaped (root with a deep groove opening only on the lingual or buccal side relative to the opposite side). Based on these patterns and their scan levels, the CBCT root morphology appearance in each tooth unit was classified into seven groups. Relationships were investigated between these seven CBCT groups and the five panoramic root types. RESULTS: In panoramic types 1 and 2 (with separate roots), 85% had roots with a double pattern (groups II and III) on the CBCT images. In panoramic types 3 and 4 (with fused roots), 85% had C-shaped CBCT patterns at the lower scan levels. CONCLUSIONS: When panoramic images show fused root types, CBCT examinations should be planned to clarify the root canal configuration.