PURPOSE: To provide tobacco product use patterns for US adults by sociodemographic group. DESIGN: A secondary analysis of Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Survey (2014-15), National Health Interview Survey (2015), and Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (2015-16). SETTING: United States. SAMPLE: Three nationally representative samples of adults (N = 28,070-155,067). MEASURES: All possible combinations of cigarette, Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS), other combustible product, and smokeless tobacco use, defined as current use every day or some days. ANALYSIS: Weighted population prevalence and proportion among tobacco users of exclusive, dual, and polyuse patterns by sex, race/ethnicity, education, income, and age. RESULTS: Exclusive cigarette use was the most prevalent pattern (10.9-12.8% of US population). Dual and polyuse were less prevalent at the population level (2.6-5.2% and 0.3-1.3%, respectively) but represented 16.7-25.5% of product use among tobacco users. Cigarette plus ENDS use was similar by sex, but men were more likely to be dual users of cigarettes plus other combustibles or smokeless tobacco. Among race/ethnic subgroups, non-Hispanic (NH) Whites were most likely to use cigarettes plus ENDS, while NH Blacks were most likely to use cigarettes plus other combustibles. Dual and polyuse were generally less common among adults with higher education, income, and age. CONCLUSION: Differences in product use patterns by sociodemographic group likely represent different risk profiles with important implications for resulting health disparities.
PURPOSE: To provide tobacco product use patterns for US adults by sociodemographic group. DESIGN: A secondary analysis of Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Survey (2014-15), National Health Interview Survey (2015), and Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (2015-16). SETTING: United States. SAMPLE: Three nationally representative samples of adults (N = 28,070-155,067). MEASURES: All possible combinations of cigarette, Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS), other combustible product, and smokeless tobacco use, defined as current use every day or some days. ANALYSIS: Weighted population prevalence and proportion among tobacco users of exclusive, dual, and polyuse patterns by sex, race/ethnicity, education, income, and age. RESULTS: Exclusive cigarette use was the most prevalent pattern (10.9-12.8% of US population). Dual and polyuse were less prevalent at the population level (2.6-5.2% and 0.3-1.3%, respectively) but represented 16.7-25.5% of product use among tobacco users. Cigarette plus ENDS use was similar by sex, but men were more likely to be dual users of cigarettes plus other combustibles or smokeless tobacco. Among race/ethnic subgroups, non-Hispanic (NH) Whites were most likely to use cigarettes plus ENDS, while NH Blacks were most likely to use cigarettes plus other combustibles. Dual and polyuse were generally less common among adults with higher education, income, and age. CONCLUSION: Differences in product use patterns by sociodemographic group likely represent different risk profiles with important implications for resulting health disparities.
Entities:
Keywords:
dual use; health disparities; inequities; multiple tobacco products; patterns of tobacco use; polytobacco
Authors: Delvon T Mattingly; Andrea R Titus; Jana L Hirschtick; Nancy L Fleischer Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-05-23 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Bukola Usidame; Jana Hirschtick; Luis Zavala-Arciniega; Delvon T Mattingly; Akash Patel; Rafael Meza; David T Levy; Nancy L Fleischer Journal: Prev Med Rep Date: 2021-09-20
Authors: Ollie Ganz; Jessica L King; Daniel P Giovenco; Mary Hrywna; Andrew A Strasser; Cristine D Delnevo Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-20 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Delvon T Mattingly; Luis Zavala-Arciniega; Jana L Hirschtick; Rafael Meza; David T Levy; Nancy L Fleischer Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-12-11 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Haleem A Brown; Rachel D Roberts; Tzuan A Chen; Michael S Businelle; Ezemenari M Obasi; Darla E Kendzor; Lorraine R Reitzel Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-03-18 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Ritesh Mistry; Irina Bondarenko; Jihyoun Jeon; Andrew F Brouwer; Delvon T Mattingly; Jana L Hirschtick; Evelyn Jimenez-Mendoza; David T Levy; Stephanie R Land; Michael R Elliott; Jeremy M G Taylor; Rafael Meza; Nancy L Fleischer Journal: Prev Med Date: 2021-08-04 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Luz María Sánchez-Romero; Christopher J Cadham; Jana L Hirschtick; Delvon T Mattingly; Beomyoung Cho; Nancy L Fleischer; Andrew Brouwer; Ritesh Mistry; Stephanie R Land; Jihyoun Jeon; Rafael Meza; David T Levy Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2021-06-24 Impact factor: 3.295