Literature DB >> 33047127

Harsh and Sweet Sensations Predict Acute Liking of Electronic Cigarettes, but Flavor Does Not Affect Acute Nicotine Intake: A Pilot Laboratory Study in Men.

Allison N Baker1,2, Alyssa J Bakke2,3, Steven A Branstetter4, John E Hayes1,2,3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Electronic cigarette use is increasing in popularity, and thousands of flavors are available. Adolescent vaping rates in the United States have nearly doubled in the past year. Unlike combustible tobacco, added flavors are not currently regulated for some types of electronic cigarette products. Here, we investigated the role of flavor in electronic cigarette liking and acute intake.
METHODS: Men (n = 39) aged 18-45 vaped in a controlled laboratory setting after being randomized to one of four e-liquids: 6 mg nicotine/mL cherry, 18 mg/mL cherry, 6 mg/mL chocolate, or 18 mg/mL chocolate. They completed several questionnaires, and vaped ad libitum for 10 minutes. After the first puff, participants rated sensations (sweetness, bitterness, coolness, harshness/irritation) on general labeled magnitude scales (gLMS) and rated overall liking on a generalized hedonic scale. Once the 10-minute session ended, participants made another set of ratings.
RESULTS: Liking was generally stable across the vaping session and liking varied substantially across the four conditions. Across all conditions, sensory ratings predicted liking: harshness/irritation was negatively associated with first puff liking, whereas perceived sweetness was positively associated with first puff liking. First puff liking associated with increased amount of e-liquid vaped, but not total nicotine intake. Participants appeared to titrate their nicotine intake regardless of assigned condition.
CONCLUSION: Flavored e-liquids affect acute liking ratings, but not acute nicotine intake. IMPLICATIONS: These data suggest individuals who regularly vape may titrate their nicotine intake, regardless of flavor, and contrary to expectations, acute liking did not predict total nicotine intake. However, more-liked flavors may potentially make higher nicotine levels more tolerable by adding pleasant sensations directly, rather than by perceptual masking that reduces aversive sensations.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33047127     DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res        ISSN: 1462-2203            Impact factor:   4.244


  3 in total

1.  Flavor and product messaging are the two most important drivers of electronic cigarette selection in a choice-based task.

Authors:  Allison N Baker; Stephen J Wilson; John E Hayes
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 2.  Flavor science in the context of research on electronic cigarettes.

Authors:  John E Hayes; Allison N Baker
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 5.152

Review 3.  Chemosensory Contributions of E-Cigarette Additives on Nicotine Use.

Authors:  Natalie L Johnson; Theresa Patten; Minghong Ma; Mariella De Biasi; Daniel W Wesson
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 5.152

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.