Literature DB >> 33046738

Pollen tube growth from multiple pollinator visits more accurately quantifies pollinator performance and plant reproduction.

Jamie R Stavert1,2, Charlie Bailey3, Lindsey Kirkland3, Romina Rader3.   

Abstract

Pollination services from animals are critical for both crop production and reproduction in wild plant species. Accurately measuring the relative contributions of different animal taxa to pollination service delivery is essential for identifying key pollinators. However, widely used measures of pollinator effectiveness (e.g., single visit pollen deposition) may be inaccurate where plant reproduction is strongly constrained by pollen quality. Here, we test the efficacy of single and multiple pollinator visits for measuring pollinator performance in a model plant species (apple, Malus domestica Borkh) that is strongly limited by pollen quality. We determined pollination success using a suite of measures (pollen deposition, pollen tube growth, fruit and seed set) from single and multiple pollinator visits. We found that pollen deposition from a single pollinator visit seldom resulted in the growth of pollen tubes capable of eliciting ovule fertilisation and never resulted in fruit or seed production. In contrast, multiple pollinator visits frequently initiated the growth of pollen tubes capable of ovule fertilisation and often led to fruit and seed production. Our findings suggest that single visit pollen deposition may provide a poor measure of pollinator performance when linked to reproductive success of plant species that are constrain by pollen quality. Alternatively, pollen tube growth from single and multiple pollinator visits can provide a measure of pollinator performance that is more closely linked to plant reproduction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33046738      PMCID: PMC7552416          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-73637-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  16 in total

1.  Pollen quality limits seed set in Burchardia umbellata (Colchicaceae).

Authors:  M Ramsey; G Vaughton
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.844

2.  Staining and observing pollen tubes in the style by means of fluorescence.

Authors:  F W MARTIN
Journal:  Stain Technol       Date:  1959-05

Review 3.  Self-incompatibility in plants.

Authors:  Seiji Takayama; Akira Isogai
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Biol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 26.379

4.  Expanding the limits of the pollen-limitation concept: effects of pollen quantity and quality.

Authors:  Marcelo A Aizen; Lawrence D Harder
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.499

5.  The rise of the angiosperms: a genecological factor.

Authors:  D L Mulcahy
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-10-05       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers.

Authors:  Simon G Potts; Jacobus C Biesmeijer; Claire Kremen; Peter Neumann; Oliver Schweiger; William E Kunin
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  Plant size, geitonogamy and seed set in Ipomopsis aggregata.

Authors:  Tom J de Jong; Nickolas M Waser; Mary V Price; Richard M Ring
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Fruit and seed production in relation to pollination and resources in bluebell, Hyacinthoides non-scripta.

Authors:  Sarah A Corbet
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Perfect syncarpy in apple (Malus x domestica 'Summerland McIntosh') and its implications for pollination, seed distribution and fruit production (Rosaceae: Maloideae).

Authors:  Cory S Sheffield; Robert F Smith; Peter G Kevan
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2005-01-20       Impact factor: 4.357

10.  Wild pollinators enhance fruit set of crops regardless of honey bee abundance.

Authors:  Lucas A Garibaldi; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter; Rachael Winfree; Marcelo A Aizen; Riccardo Bommarco; Saul A Cunningham; Claire Kremen; Luísa G Carvalheiro; Lawrence D Harder; Ohad Afik; Ignasi Bartomeus; Faye Benjamin; Virginie Boreux; Daniel Cariveau; Natacha P Chacoff; Jan H Dudenhöffer; Breno M Freitas; Jaboury Ghazoul; Sarah Greenleaf; Juliana Hipólito; Andrea Holzschuh; Brad Howlett; Rufus Isaacs; Steven K Javorek; Christina M Kennedy; Kristin M Krewenka; Smitha Krishnan; Yael Mandelik; Margaret M Mayfield; Iris Motzke; Theodore Munyuli; Brian A Nault; Mark Otieno; Jessica Petersen; Gideon Pisanty; Simon G Potts; Romina Rader; Taylor H Ricketts; Maj Rundlöf; Colleen L Seymour; Christof Schüepp; Hajnalka Szentgyörgyi; Hisatomo Taki; Teja Tscharntke; Carlos H Vergara; Blandina F Viana; Thomas C Wanger; Catrin Westphal; Neal Williams; Alexandra M Klein
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  1 in total

1.  Using RNA-seq to characterize pollen-stigma interactions for pollination studies.

Authors:  Juan Lobaton; Rose Andrew; Jorge Duitama; Lindsey Kirkland; Sarina Macfadyen; Romina Rader
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.