| Literature DB >> 33046729 |
Han Y Yin1,2, Anny M S Cheng3,4, Sean Tighe3,5,6, Philip Kurochkin7, Jamie Nord7, Swetha Dhanireddy7, Robert Swan7, Samuel Alpert8.
Abstract
To compare the effectiveness of self- retained cryopreserved AM as an adjuvant therapy for infectious corneal ulcers. Retrospective, case-control study of 24 eyes of 24 consecutive patients with central and paracentral corneal infectious ulcers and initial visual acuity worse than 20/200. Among them, 11 eyes of 11 patients received additional placement of self-retained cryopreserved AM. Epithelialization and Best Corrected Snellen Visual Acuity (BCSVA) were compared between the two groups. At baseline, both groups had comparable age, gender, visual acuity (VA), size and location of corneal ulcer. Patients receiving additional placement of cryopreserved AM had significantly faster epithelialization within 3.56 ± 1.78 weeks vs 5.87 ± 2.20 weeks (p = 0.01) and achieved complete epithelialization in significantly more patients (72.7% vs 23.1% p = 0.04) despite overall larger baseline defect size (32.7 ± 19.5 mm2 vs 21.5 ± 10.7 mm2, p = 0.11). Consequently, the AM group had clinically significant BCSVA (> 3 lines) (81.8% vs 38.4%, p = 0.047) and total VA improvement (log MAR 0.7 ± 0.6 vs 1.6 ± 0.9, p = 0.016) compared to the control group at the time of complete epithelialization. In-office sutureless AM may be an effective adjuvant therapy in treating sight-threatening infectious corneal ulcers by promoting faster corneal epithelialization and overall better recovery of the VA.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33046729 PMCID: PMC7550608 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-73672-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Demographics and Clinical Data of study population treated with conventional therapy and self-retained amniotic membrane as adjuvant therapy.
| No | Sex/age (years)/ eye | Pathogens | Contact lens related | Ulcer site | Ulcer size (mm2) | Hypopyon (mm) | Complete epithelialization time (weeks) | Visual acuity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre | Final | ||||||||
| 1 | M/42/OD | No | Paracentral | 42 | – | 2.14 | CF | 20/20 | |
| 2 | F/53/OD | Yes | Central | 27.5 | 1 | 5.14 | CF | 20/200 | |
| 3 | F/39/OS | No | Central | 60 | – | 2.00 | HM | 20/60 | |
| 4 | M/20/OD | Yes | Central | 56 | 1.5 | 7.00 | HM | 20/1000 | |
| 5 | M/42/OD | Yes | Central | 63 | 1 | 5.86 | HM | CF | |
| 6 | M/52/OS | Yes | Paracentral | 12.25 | 0.5 | 3.71 | HM | 20/30 | |
| 7 | M/53/OD | No | Central | 16 | 2 | 3.43 | LP | 20/200 | |
| 8 | F/77/OS | No | Paracentral | 13.5 | – | 2.29 | HM | 20/50 | |
| 9 | M/52/OD | no | Central | 30 | 1 | 2.57 | HM | 20/200 | |
| 10 | M/28/OD | Yes | Central | 25 | 0.5 | 3.71 | HM | 20/60 | |
| 11 | F/33/OD | Yes | Central | 14 | 0.5 | 1.29 | CF | 20/25 | |
Demographics and Clinical Data of study population treated with conventional therapy.
| No | Sex/age (years)/eye | Pathogens | Contact lens related | Ulcer site | Ulcer size area (mm2) | Hypopyon (mm) | Complete epithelialization time (weeks) | Visual acuity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre | Final | ||||||||
| 1 | F/68/OD | No | Central | 12.5 | 1 | 4.71 | HM | HM | |
| 2 | F/27/OS | yes | Central | 35.75 | 1 | 3.57 | LP | 20/400 | |
| 3 | M/60/OD | No | Paracentral | 25 | – | 7.71 | HM | 20/400 | |
| 4 | F/53/OD | Yes | Paracentral | 12 | – | 5.85 | HM | HM | |
| 5 | F/73/OS | No | Paracentral | 12.5 | – | 6.00 | HM | HM | |
| 6 | M/71/OS | No | Central | 25 | 2.0 | 9.14 | LP | LP | |
| 7 | F/68/ OD | No | Central | 25 | – | 9.28 | HM | CF | |
| 8 | F/92/ OD | No | Paracentral | 7.5 | – | 5.00 | 20/800 | 20/300 | |
| 9 | F/87/ OS | No | Central | 24 | – | 6.00 | HM | HM | |
| 10 | M/29/OD | Yes | Paracentral | 12.5 | 0.5 | 3.14 | HM | 20/100 | |
| 11 | F/28/ OD | Yes | Paracentral | 12.25 | – | 2.71 | HM | 20/30 | |
| 12 | M/61/OS | Yes | Central | 35 | 1.5 | 8.42 | HM | HM | |
| 13 | F/78/ OD | No | Central | 40 | – | 4.85 | HM | CF | |