| Literature DB >> 33046685 |
Jian-Hong You1, Yi-Fan Zhuang2, Ming-Zhu Lu3, Ling Chen4, Ze-Kun Chen5, Xiao-Kang Chen5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ultrasound (US) is the preferred imaging method for cryptorchidism, but most guidelines indicate that its value is questionable. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical value of ultrasonic mobility and testicular atrophy index (TAI) based on three‑dimensional US (3DUS) in preoperative and postoperative assessment of the undescended testis. MATERIAL AND METHODS Data from 158 children with unilateral extraperitoneal cryptorchidism were collected and their diagnoses were surgically confirmed. They were divided into different age groups and into 2 ultrasonic mobility groups: the mobile group (MG) and the restricted group (RG). Differences in sonographic characteristics between different groups were compared. Three-dimensional ultrasound performed with virtual organ computer-aided analysis (VOCAL) was used to determined preoperative and postoperative TAI and the reliability of TAI was analyzed. RESULTS Measurement of testicular volume with the VOCAL method was significantly more reliable than that done with the two-dimensional Lambert method. In all age groups, preoperative testicular volumes were smaller than that in the contralateral scrotal testis and postoperatively, they increased steadily. Both preoperative and postoperative TAI were higher in the RG than in the MG. In the MG, postoperative TAI decreased significantly in all age groups. In the RG, in contrast, effective volume growth was only achieved in patients who had undergone surgery before they reached age 1 year. CONCLUSIONS TAI values determined with 3DUS using the VOCAL technique objectively reflect recovery of testicular volume following surgery for undescended testicle. Ultrasonic mobility evaluation is beneficial for clinical management of the condition.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33046685 PMCID: PMC7568441 DOI: 10.12659/MSM.924325
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
Figure 1Ultrasonography of undescended testicle and volume measurement by VOCAL technique. (A) Inguinal clear boundary and reduced volume; (B) Prescrotal cryptorchidism with uneven echo and sparse perfusion; (C) Cryptorchidism with patent processus vaginalis (D) Testicular volume measured by 3-dimensional ultrasound VOCAL technique.
Characteristics of different groups observed by ultrasound.
| MG (n=113) | RG (n=45) | P value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Location | Scrotal root | 65 | 3 | |
| Inguinal region | 48 | 42 | ||
| Boundary | Clear | 87 | 27 | |
| Unclear | 26 | 18 | ||
| Morphology | Regular | 93 | 32 | p=0.132 |
| Irregular | 20 | 13 | ||
| Internal echo | Uniform | 77 | 21 | p=0.0177 |
| Uneven | 36 | 24 | ||
| TAI | <25% | 30 | 0 | |
| >25% | 83 | 45 | ||
| Blood distribution | Well filled | 66 | 12 | |
| Sparse | 47 | 33 | ||
| Processus vaginalis | Patent | 67 | 34 | |
| Occluded | 46 | 11 |
MG – mobile group; RG – restricted group; TAI – testicular atrophy index.
Figure 2Difference in intraobserver and interobserver volume measurements plotted against their means. (A) Intraobserver volume measurements; (B) Interobserver volume measurements.
Figure 3Testicular volume changes after orchiopexy in different age groups. (A) Line chart of testicular volume plotted against testing time; (B) Histogram of testicular atrophy index at different periods. * Compared with before operation, P<0.05.
Figure 4Preoperative and postoperative TAI in different ultrasonic classifications. MG – mobile group; RG – restricted group; I – Group I (age 0 to 1 year); II – Group II (age >1 to <6 years); III – Group III (age 6 to 9 years). * Compared with MG, P<0.05; # Compared with before, P<0.05.
Comparison of reliability of volume measurement by 2DUS Lambert method and 3D VOCAL method.
| Suggested cutoff value [ | 2D ultrasound Lambert method | 3D VOCAL method IC | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | ICC | Intraobserver ICC | Interobserver ICC | Intraobserver ICC | Interobserver ICC |
| Very poor | <0.95 | ||||
| Poor | 0.95–0.98 | 0.962 | |||
| Moderate | 0.98–0.99 | 0.981 | |||
| Good | 0.99–0.998 | 0.996 | 0.993 | ||
| Very good | >0.998 | ||||
2DUS – two-dimensional ultrasound; ICC – interclass correlation coefficient.