Literature DB >> 33046500

Efficacy of Telavancin in Comparison to Linezolid in a Porcine Model of Severe Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Pneumonia.

D Battaglini1,2,3,4, A Motos1,5,6,4, G Li Bassi1,5,6,4,7, H Yang1,6, F Pagliara1,2,3, M Yang1,6,4, E Aguilera Xiol1,5,6,4, A Meli1,8, J Bobi1,6, G Frigola9, T Senussi1,2,3, F Idone1,10, C Travierso1,8, C Chiurazzi1,11, L Fernandez-Barat1,5,6,4, M Rigol1,6, J Ramirez9, P Pelosi2,3, D Chiumello8, M Antonelli10,12, D P Nicolau13, J Bringue14, A Artigas14, L Guerrero1,15, D Soy15, A Torres16,5,6,4.   

Abstract

Current guidelines recommend vancomycin and linezolid as first-line agents against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nosocomial pneumonia. Telavancin is a potential new therapeutic alternative, specifically in monomicrobial MRSA pneumonia. This study compared the efficacies of telavancin versus linezolid in a porcine model of severe MRSA pneumonia. In 18 mechanically ventilated pigs (32.11 ± 1.18 kg), 75 ml of 106 CFU/ml of MRSA was administered into each pulmonary lobe. After the onset of pneumonia, pigs were randomized into three groups: a control group, a group receiving 22.5 mg/kg of body weight every 24 h (q24h) of telavancin, and a group receiving 10 mg/kg q12h of linezolid intravenously. Tracheal aspirate and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluids were cultured every 24 h. After 48 h of treatment, tissue samples were collected from the ventral and dorsal sections of each lobe. Microbiological and histopathological analyses were performed. Lung tissue concentrations differed among the groups (P = 0.019), with the lowest MRSA lung burden in the telavancin group (P < 0.05 versus the control). MRSA was detected in 46.7%, 40.0%, and 21.7% of the lung tissue samples from the control, linezolid, and telavancin groups, respectively (P < 0.001). MRSA concentrations differed among the groups in tracheal aspirate fluid (P = 0.011) but not in BAL fluid. Furthermore, there was no increased risk of kidney injury during telavancin use. Thus, telavancin has higher bactericidal efficacy than linezolid during the first 48 h of treatment in a porcine model of severe MRSA pneumonia. However, studies are needed to confirm the benefits of telavancin in treating MRSA nosocomial pneumonia.
Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRSA; animal models; linezolid; mechanical ventilation; pig; porcine model; severe pneumonia; telavancin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33046500      PMCID: PMC7927834          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01009-20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  33 in total

1.  Accurate detection of outliers and subpopulations with Pmetrics, a nonparametric and parametric pharmacometric modeling and simulation package for R.

Authors:  Michael N Neely; Michael G van Guilder; Walter M Yamada; Alan Schumitzky; Roger W Jelliffe
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.681

2.  Efficacy of linezolid compared to vancomycin in an experimental model of pneumonia induced by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in ventilated pigs.

Authors:  Pilar Martinez-Olondris; Montserrat Rigol; Dolors Soy; Laura Guerrero; Carlos Agusti; Maria Angels Quera; Gianluigi Li Bassi; Mariano Esperatti; Nestor Luque; Manto Liapikou; Xavier Filella; Francesc Marco; Jordi Puig de la Bellacasa; Antoni Torres
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 3.  Animal models in the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic evaluation of antimicrobial agents.

Authors:  Miao Zhao; Alexander J Lepak; David R Andes
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  Pharmacokinetics and intrapulmonary concentrations of linezolid administered to critically ill patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia.

Authors:  Emmanuel Boselli; Dominique Breilh; Thomas Rimmelé; Sarah Djabarouti; Jérôme Toutain; Dominique Chassard; Marie-Claude Saux; Bernard Allaouchiche
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Estimation of volume of epithelial lining fluid recovered by lavage using urea as marker of dilution.

Authors:  S I Rennard; G Basset; D Lecossier; K M O'Donnell; P Pinkston; P G Martin; R G Crystal
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1986-02

Review 6.  Animal models of hospital-acquired pneumonia: current practices and future perspectives.

Authors:  Kenny Bielen; Bart 's Jongers; Surbhi Malhotra-Kumar; Philippe G Jorens; Herman Goossens; Samir Kumar-Singh
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-03

Review 7.  Linezolid versus vancomycin or teicoplanin for nosocomial pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andre C Kalil; Madhu H Murthy; Elizabeth D Hermsen; Felipe K Neto; Junfeng Sun; Mark E Rupp
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 8.  Limitations of vancomycin in the management of resistant staphylococcal infections.

Authors:  Marin H Kollef
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Comparative surveillance study of telavancin activity against recently collected gram-positive clinical isolates from across the United States.

Authors:  Deborah C Draghi; Bret M Benton; Kevin M Krause; Clyde Thornsberry; Chris Pillar; Daniel F Sahm
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-04-28       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Early microbiological response to linezolid vs vancomycin in ventilator-associated pneumonia due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Richard G Wunderink; Meryl H Mendelson; Michael S Somero; Timothy C Fabian; Addison K May; Helen Bhattacharyya; Kenneth V Leeper; Joseph S Solomkin
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 9.410

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.