Literature DB >> 33046098

The altered transcriptome of pediatric myelodysplastic syndrome revealed by RNA sequencing.

Lorena Zubovic1, Silvano Piazza2, Toma Tebaldi3, Luca Cozzuto4, Giuliana Palazzo5, Viktoryia Sidarovich6, Veronica De Sanctis7, Roberto Bertorelli7, Tim Lammens8, Mattias Hofmans8, Barbara De Moerloose8, Julia Ponomarenko4,9, Martina Pigazzi10, Riccardo Masetti11, Cristina Mecucci12, Giuseppe Basso13,14, Paolo Macchi15.   

Abstract

Pediatric myelodysplastic syndrome (PMDS) is a very rare and still poorly characterized disorder. In this work, we identified novel potential targets of PMDS by determining genes with aberrant expression, which can be correlated with PMDS pathogenesis. We identified 291 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in PMDS patients, comprising genes involved in the regulation of apoptosis and the cell cycle, ribosome biogenesis, inflammation and adaptive immunity. Ten selected DEGs were then validated, confirming the sequencing data. These DEGs will potentially represent new molecular biomarkers and therapeutic targets for PMDS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Differentially expressed genes; Myelodysplastic syndrome; Pediatrics; Transcriptome

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33046098      PMCID: PMC7552545          DOI: 10.1186/s13045-020-00974-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hematol Oncol        ISSN: 1756-8722            Impact factor:   17.388


To the Editor

MDSs are a heterogeneous group of clonal hematopoietic neoplasms. Although recent studies have shown that MDS and AML patients had different gene mutation patterns [1-4], the molecular underpinnings remain unknown [5-10]. To identify DEGs related to the PMDS, we performed RNA-seq in 4 patients with primary PMDS and in 2 control pediatric samples (Additional file 1: Figures S1A-B). Because of the limited number of samples and to limit the false positives, we used two independent bioinformatics pipelines, STAR + DESeq2 and SALMON + edgeR, and considered only genes differentially expressed in both pipelines. Hierarchical clustering showed that PMDS patients and controls clustered in two distinct groups (Fig. 1a). In total, 651 DEGs were identified by STAR + DESeq2 and 616 DEGs by SALMON + edgeR (Fig. 1B; Additional file 1: Figures S1C-D). 291 DEGs were identified by both pipelines among which 136 genes were upregulated and 155 downregulated in patients (Additional file 1: Table 1). As a further validation, we used the LPEseq method. The concordance of the genes in the ranks of the differential gene lists was remarkably high (Additional file 1: Figures S1E-G). We then used GSEA to identify altered pathways from the Reactome database (Web reference 1) (Fig. 1c). The Enrichr enrichment analysis tool revealed that DEGs in PMDS are mainly related to pathways associated with the cell abnormal activity, immune and inflammatory systems and erythropoiesis (Additional file 1: Figure S2A).
Fig. 1

a Z-score hierarchical clustering analysis and heatmap of differentially expressed genes. The color scale means the gene expression standard deviations from the mean green. b Scatterplot of the differentially expressed genes obtained using the SALMON and STAR pipelines (different colors highlight genes identified as differentially expressed in none, one, or both pipelines). c Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) rank plots for top statistically significant Reactome pathways with Normalized Enrichment Score (NES)

a Z-score hierarchical clustering analysis and heatmap of differentially expressed genes. The color scale means the gene expression standard deviations from the mean green. b Scatterplot of the differentially expressed genes obtained using the SALMON and STAR pipelines (different colors highlight genes identified as differentially expressed in none, one, or both pipelines). c Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) rank plots for top statistically significant Reactome pathways with Normalized Enrichment Score (NES) Further, we compared our data with the transcriptomic profiles from TCGA database. Interestingly, we found a clear distinction of PMDS from all other types of tumors (Fig. 2a; Additional file 1: Figure S2B). Moreover, the DEGs profile was able to divide tumors into three distinct groups (Additional file 1: Figure S3A). As for control samples, we integrated the transcriptomic data from the GTEx (Web reference 2) and observed a clear separation between blood related tissues and other normal tissues (Additional file 1: Figures S3B). Finally, we compared the DEGs gene list with the gene sets available in the Enrichr database specifically for “Diseases/Drugs” and “Cell types “categories (Additional file 1: Tables 2–3). We confirmed that the DEGs identified in PMDS are significantly connected with blood tissues and blood disorders (Additional file 1: Figure S3C).
Fig. 2

a T-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) plot in the expression space of several cancer datasets, plotting the results of the two principal dimensions. The data were obtained from the GDC-PAN cancer data Portal. The PMDS samples do not cluster near other tumor types, AML in particular (black arrowhead), showing a distinct profile. b Boxplot: ddPCR analysis of twelve genes, comparing expression levels between controls and PMDS patients. For each gene, box–whisker plots of concentration values are shown. Genes are classified as upregulated (red), downregulated (blue) and reference (grey). Significant changes in cDNA concentration between control and patients are highlighted (one-tailed t test, corrected for unequal variances *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001)

a T-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) plot in the expression space of several cancer datasets, plotting the results of the two principal dimensions. The data were obtained from the GDC-PAN cancer data Portal. The PMDS samples do not cluster near other tumor types, AML in particular (black arrowhead), showing a distinct profile. b Boxplot: ddPCR analysis of twelve genes, comparing expression levels between controls and PMDS patients. For each gene, box–whisker plots of concentration values are shown. Genes are classified as upregulated (red), downregulated (blue) and reference (grey). Significant changes in cDNA concentration between control and patients are highlighted (one-tailed t test, corrected for unequal variances *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001) A comparison of our PMDS DEGs with multiple RNA-seq datasets from adult MDS samples revealed a statistically significant overlap (67 out of 136 DEGs). Nonetheless, 69 upregulated genes and almost all downregulated genes were unique in PMDS (Additional file 1: Figure S4A-B; Additional file 1: Table 4). Then, we validated the most statistically significant and biologically relevant DEGs either up- or downregulated. Analysis by ddPCR showed significant differences between patient and control samples (Fig. 2b). The log2 fold-change values for all 10 genes were highly correlated (Additional file 1: Figure S5). We also validated the DEGs in 6 new PMDS patients (Additional file 1: Figure S6). Additionally, we compared our data with 36 pediatric patients (3). The comparative data on 10 DEGs in PMDS and validation are shown in the Additional file 1: Figure S7. In conclusion, we have identified 291 DEGs that correlate with the PMDS which might represent novel candidate genes for therapeutic intervention. Although a larger study cohort would be desirable, our data suggest that at the level of gene expression the PMDS is indeed a distinct disorder. Additional file 1. The altered transcriptome of pediatric myelodysplastic syndrome revealed by RNA sequencing.
  10 in total

1.  Gene expression signatures of pediatric myelodysplastic syndromes are associated with risk of evolution into acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  S Bresolin; L Trentin; M Zecca; M Giordan; L Sainati; F Locatelli; G Basso; G te Kronnie
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 2.  Implications of molecular genetic diversity in myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Rafael Bejar
Journal:  Curr Opin Hematol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.284

3.  Myelodysplastic syndromes in children: where are we today?

Authors:  A T K Rau; A K Shreedhara; S Kumar
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2012

Review 4.  Myelodysplastic syndromes: the pediatric point of view.

Authors:  F Locatelli; M Zecca; A Pession; E Maserati; P De Stefano; F Severi
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  1995 May-Jun       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 5.  The genetic basis of myelodysplasia and its clinical relevance.

Authors:  Mario Cazzola; Matteo G Della Porta; Luca Malcovati
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  The genomic landscape of pediatric myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Jason R Schwartz; Jing Ma; Tamara Lamprecht; Michael Walsh; Shuoguo Wang; Victoria Bryant; Guangchun Song; Gang Wu; John Easton; Chimene Kesserwan; Kim E Nichols; Charles G Mullighan; Raul C Ribeiro; Jeffery M Klco
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Gene mutational analysis by NGS and its clinical significance in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Jifeng Yu; Yingmei Li; Tao Li; Yafei Li; Haizhou Xing; Hui Sun; Ling Sun; Dingming Wan; Yanfang Liu; Xinsheng Xie; Zhongxing Jiang
Journal:  Exp Hematol Oncol       Date:  2020-01-06

8.  Clinical and biological implications of driver mutations in myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Elli Papaemmanuil; Moritz Gerstung; Luca Malcovati; Sudhir Tauro; Gunes Gundem; Peter Van Loo; Chris J Yoon; Peter Ellis; David C Wedge; Andrea Pellagatti; Adam Shlien; Michael John Groves; Simon A Forbes; Keiran Raine; Jon Hinton; Laura J Mudie; Stuart McLaren; Claire Hardy; Calli Latimer; Matteo G Della Porta; Sarah O'Meara; Ilaria Ambaglio; Anna Galli; Adam P Butler; Gunilla Walldin; Jon W Teague; Lynn Quek; Alex Sternberg; Carlo Gambacorti-Passerini; Nicholas C P Cross; Anthony R Green; Jacqueline Boultwood; Paresh Vyas; Eva Hellstrom-Lindberg; David Bowen; Mario Cazzola; Michael R Stratton; Peter J Campbell
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 9.  Clinical implications of recurrent gene mutations in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Jifeng Yu; Yingmei Li; Danfeng Zhang; Dingming Wan; Zhongxing Jiang
Journal:  Exp Hematol Oncol       Date:  2020-03-27

10.  Circulating Small Noncoding RNAs Have Specific Expression Patterns in Plasma and Extracellular Vesicles in Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Are Predictive of Patient Outcome.

Authors:  Andrea Hrustincova; Zdenek Krejcik; David Kundrat; Katarina Szikszai; Monika Belickova; Pavla Pecherkova; Jiri Klema; Jitka Vesela; Monika Hruba; Jaroslav Cermak; Tereza Hrdinova; Matyas Krijt; Jan Valka; Anna Jonasova; Michaela Dostalova Merkerova
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 6.600

  10 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  RNA sequencing: new technologies and applications in cancer research.

Authors:  Mingye Hong; Shuang Tao; Ling Zhang; Li-Ting Diao; Xuanmei Huang; Shaohui Huang; Shu-Juan Xie; Zhen-Dong Xiao; Hua Zhang
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 17.388

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.