| Literature DB >> 33046076 |
Lvfan Feng1, Yuan Tian2, Mei He2, Jie Tang2, Ying Peng1, Chenjie Dong2, Wenzhong Xu3, Tao Wang3, Jiangjiang He4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The asymmetry of information brings difficulty for government to manage public hospitals. Therefore, Jiading District of Shanghai has been establishing DRGs-based inpatient service management system (ISMS) to effectively compare the output of different hospitals through DRGs, reward desired hospital performance and enhance inpatient service capacity. However, the impact of the implementation of DRGs-based inpatient service management (ISM) policy in Jiading district is still unknow. We therefore conducted this study to evaluate the impact of DRGs-based ISM policy on the performance of inpatient service since its implementation in Jiading District, Shanghai, China in 2017.Entities:
Keywords: DRGs; Interrupted time series; Performance evaluation; Service capacity; Service efficiency; Service quality
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33046076 PMCID: PMC7552463 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05790-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Health Serv Res ISSN: 1472-6963 Impact factor: 2.655
Regional medical performance indicators between 2013 and 2019
| Indicator | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 13–16 annual growth rate | 17–19 annual growth rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 623 | 624 | 644 | 656 | 679 | 684 | 723 | 1.3% | 2.2% | |
| 0.692 | 0.696 | 0.686 | 0.694 | 0.730 | 0.775 | 0.800 | 0.1% | 3.2% | |
| 45,571 | 47,646 | 47,008 | 49,387 | 55,425 | 60,648 | 65,850 | 2.1% | 6.3% | |
| 1.092 | 1.078 | 1.018 | 1.031 | 1.009 | 0.973 | 0.920 | −1.4% | −3.0% | |
| 0.874 | 0.894 | 0.922 | 1.033 | 1.088 | 1.074 | 1.042 | 4.6% | −1.4% | |
| 0.109 | 0.121 | 0.100 | 0.143 | 0.059 | 0.032 | 0.014 | 7.7% | −25.7% | |
| 1.191 | 0.904 | 1.013 | 0.898 | 0.626 | 0.427 | 0.361 | −6.1% | −14.1% |
Fig. 1Trend of regional performance indicators in 2013–2019
Results of change in performance indicators pre- and post- policy intervention
| Indicator | Variable | β | S.E. | T | P | DW | DF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | 478.43 | 6.55 | 73.081 | 0.000*** | 1.930 | −4.763* | |
| β1 | 3.24 | 0.68 | 4.792 | 0.000*** | |||
| β2 | −6.94 | 24.65 | −0.281 | 0.781 | |||
| β3 | 0.37 | 1.24 | 0.298 | 0.768 | |||
| Intercept | 0.694 | 0.008 | 88.635 | 0.000*** | 1.889 | −5.263* | |
| β1 | −0.0002 | 0.001 | −0.266 | 0.793 | |||
| β2 | −0.103 | 0.029 | −3.479 | 0.002** | |||
| β3 | 0.008 | 0.001 | 5.419 | 0.000*** | |||
| Intercept | 11,000.44 | 395.31 | 27.827 | 0.000*** | 1.91 | −4.844* | |
| β1 | 100.04 | 40.88 | 2.447 | 0.022* | |||
| β2 | −3719.05 | 1488.41 | −3.499 | 0.020* | |||
| β3 | 250.13 | 75.13 | 3.329 | 0.003** | |||
| Intercept | 1.10 | 0.01 | 111.191 | 0.000*** | 1.716 | −5.379* | |
| β1 | −0.01 | 0.001 | −5.374 | 0.000*** | |||
| β2 | 0.12 | 0.04 | 3.087 | 0.005** | |||
| β3 | −0.01 | 0.002 | −2.942 | 0.007** | |||
| Intercept | 0.83 | 0.02 | 35.084 | 0.000*** | 1.079*** | −5.262* | |
| β1 | 0.01 | 0.002 | 5.090 | 0.000*** | |||
| β2 | 0.31 | 0.09 | 3.665 | 0.001** | |||
| β3 | −0.02 | 0.005 | −3.477 | 0.002** | |||
| Intercept | 0.12 | 0.03 | 3.738 | 0.001** | 1.697 | −5.854* | |
| β1 | 0.0002 | 0.003 | 0.061 | 0.952 | |||
| β2 | 0.07 | 0.12 | 0.622 | 0.540 | |||
| β3 | −0.01 | 0.01 | −1.191 | 0.245 | |||
| Intercept | 1.20 | 0.11 | 10.847 | 0.000*** | 2.288 | −7.127* | |
| β1 | −0.02 | 0.01 | −1.992 | 0.058· | |||
| β2 | 0.14 | 0.42 | 0.325 | 0.748 | |||
| β3 | −0.02 | 0.02 | −0.734 | 0.470 |
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001. Durbin-Watson test all indicated no autocorrelation, except CEI. Dickey–Fuller results indicated that there is no unit root and time series is stationary. The intervention study period was between 2013 to 2019, where pre-intervention was from 2013 to 2016 and post-intervention was from 2017 to 2019
Fig. 2Graphic of change in performance indicators pre- and post- policy intervention