| Literature DB >> 33046014 |
Houda Gharsallah1, Ines Ksentini2, Sourour Naayma2, Karama Hadj Taieb2,3, Nour Abdelhedi2, Christina Schuster4,5, Mohamed Ali Triki2, Mohieddine Ksantini2, Andreas Leclerque4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Olive production is the main agricultural activity in Tunisia. The diversity of fungi was explored in two different olive groves located in two distant geographical zones in Sfax (Tunisia) with different management practices.Entities:
Keywords: Antagonism; Biological control; Entomopathogenicity; Fungi; Insect pests; Phytopathogenicity
Year: 2020 PMID: 33046014 PMCID: PMC7552492 DOI: 10.1186/s12866-020-01997-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Microbiol ISSN: 1471-2180 Impact factor: 3.605
Fungal isolated from different olive orchards identified by sequence comparison with the BLASTn (NCBI GenBank database)
| Family, | Sample isolation | mode of driving | Close relative research result (GenBank accession number) | Identity match (%) | No. of bp analyzed | Query cover | E-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | |||||||
| | |||||||
| F3 | Insect | Biological | 100 | 300 | 100% | 1e-80 | |
| F49’ | Insect | Biological | 98 | 100 | 100% | 6e-49 | |
| | |||||||
| F14 | Insect | Biological | 99 | 170 | 98% | 2e-69 | |
| F33 | Insect | Conventional | 100 | 130 | 100% | 2e-51 | |
| | |||||||
| F29 | Insect | Conventional | 100 | 120 | 100% | 2e-51 | |
| | |||||||
| F36 | Soil | Biological | 100 | 330 | 100% | 5e-162 | |
| F38 | Insect | Biological | 100 | 120 | 100% | 2e-51 | |
| | |||||||
| F34 | Insect | Biological | 100 | 110 | 89% | 1e-65 | |
| F41 | Insect | Biological | 100 | 120 | 100% | 2e-51 | |
| | |||||||
| F30 | Insect | Conventional | 100 | 130 | 100% | 2e-51 | |
| | |||||||
| | |||||||
| F1’ | Soil | Biological | 100 | 150 | 100% | 2e-74 | |
| F25 | Soil | Biological | 99 | 100 | 100% | 2e-51 | |
| | |||||||
| F23 | Soil | Biological | 97 | 120 | 87% | 6e-54 | |
| | |||||||
| F46 | Insect | Conventional | 100 | 120 | 100% | 3e-50 | |
| | |||||||
| F21 | Insect | Conventional | 100 | 170 | 98% | 7e-79 | |
| F57 | Insect | Conventional | 100 | 125 | 100% | 2e-51 | |
| | |||||||
| F13 | Soil | Biological | 100 | 100 | 100% | 8e-29 | |
| | |||||||
| F60 | Insect | Conventional | 99 | 230 | 98% | 2e-120 | |
| | |||||||
| F58 | Insect | Conventional | 100 | 150 | 100% | 9e-78 | |
| | |||||||
| F22 | Soil | Biological | 98 | 100 | 70% | 8e-21 | |
| F26 | Soil | Biological | 99 | 120 | 94% | 6e-27 | |
| F27 | Soil | Biological | 99 | 120 | 90% | 2e-31 | |
| | |||||||
| | |||||||
| F18 | Insect | Conventional | 99 | 150 | 100% | 6e-71 | |
| F40 | Insect | Conventional | 100 | 120 | 100% | 2e-51 | |
| F50’ | Insect | Biological | 100 | 115 | 100% | 4e-48 | |
| F52’ | Insect | Conventional | 99 | 335 | 100% | 2e-149 | |
| | |||||||
| F45 | Insect | Biological | 99 | 120 | 100% | 8e-50 | |
| | |||||||
| F17 | Insect | Biological | 99 | 250 | 100% | 5e-105 | |
| F20’ | Insect | Conventional | 98 | 200 | 100% | 3e-100 | |
| | |||||||
| | |||||||
| F16 | Insect | Conventional | 99 | 200 | 99% | 1e-55 | |
| F59 | Insect | Conventional | 100 | 100 | 100% | 2e-51 | |
| | |||||||
| | |||||||
| F10 | Insect | Conventional | 99 | 160 | 100% | 2e-51 | |
| F50 | Insect | Conventional | 100 | 140 | 100% | 2e-51 | |
| | |||||||
| | |||||||
| F28’ | Insect | Conventional | 99 | 250 | 100% | 1e-132 | |
Fig. 1Genera enzymatic activity distribution of the fungal isolates related to Tunisian olive orchards. For each genus, the number of isolates producing extracellular enzyme was attributed
Antagonistic activity of our collected fungal isolates against 6 pathogenic fungal isolates
| Antagonistic Fungal isolates | Fungal pathogens | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F3 | + | – | ++ | – | – | – |
| F49’ | + | ++ | +++ | +++ | – | – |
| F14 | +++ | + | +++ | – | – | – |
| F33 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| F29 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| F36 | – | ++ | ++ | – | – | +++ |
| F38 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| F34 | ++ | – | +++ | – | – | – |
| F41 | + | – | – | – | – | ++ |
| F30 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| F1’ | – | ++ | – | – | – | – |
| F25 | – | +++ | – | – | – | – |
| F23 | – | – | ++ | – | – | – |
| F46 | + | + | ++ | – | – | – |
| F21 | – | + | – | – | – | ++ |
| F57 | – | + | + | – | + | + |
| F13 | ++ | +++ | + | – | – | – |
| F60 | – | – | ++ | ++ | + | – |
| F58 | – | – | + | – | – | – |
| F22 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| F26 | – | +++ | – | – | – | ++ |
| F27 | – | +++ | – | – | – | ++ |
| F18 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| F40 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| F50’ | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| F52’ | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| F45 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| F17 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| F20’ | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| F16 | – | – | ++ | – | – | – |
| F59 | – | ++ | ++ | – | + | ++ |
| F10 | +++ | – | – | – | – | – |
| F50 | – | – | – | – | – | + |
| F28’ | – | – | + | – | – | – |
The activity was detected for clear halo zones around the colonies. The inhibition zone diameters varied from 0 to 40 mm. The inhibition zones diameterincrease concurrently. + [5–10], ++ [11–20], +++ [21–40], − no zones of inhibition
Fig. 2Mean mortality rate of forth instar Ephestia kuehniella larvae fed with semolina mixed with conidial suspension of fungi at concentration adjusted to 107 conidia/ml, 7 days after treatment. Bars followed by letters are significantly different (p < 0.05), according to Tukey test
Phytopathogenic activity, of fungal isolates showing cortex browning or vascular tissue browning, using excised shoot assays 28 days after inoculation based on tissues browning
| Fungal isolates displaying phytopathogenic activity | Phytopathogenic activity | |
|---|---|---|
| Cortex Browning | Vascular Tissues Browning | |
| + | – | |
| + | – | |
| – | + | |
| – | + | |
| + | – | |
| + | – | |
| – | + | |
| – | + | |
| – | + | |