| Literature DB >> 33045989 |
Vera Spatenkova1, Eckhard Teschner2, Jaroslav Jedlicka3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) has become a widely performed technique in neurocritical care, which is however known to be accompanied by some risks to the patient. The aim of this pilot study was to assess the derecruitment effects of PDT with the electric impedance tomography (EIT) during the PDT procedure in neurocritical care.Entities:
Keywords: Electric impedance tomography; Lung imaging; Neurocritical care; Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy; Tracheostomy
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33045989 PMCID: PMC7549221 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-020-01948-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Neurol ISSN: 1471-2377 Impact factor: 2.474
Fig. 1EIT imaging pre and post percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy
Data of electric impedance tomography
| Patient number | RVD SD % | Pre-post | ΔEELI % of pre PDT | Time open trachea s | C static | SpO2% | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre PDT | Post PDT | Pre | Post | Pre | Post | |||||
| 4 | 9 | 6 | 18 | 2 | 29 | 26 | 46 | 38 | 100 | 100 |
| 5 | 10 | 7 | 10 | 18 | 12 | 50 | 100 | 160 | 100 | 100 |
| 6 | 7 | 7 | 21 | 5 | −25 | 170 | 34 | 33 | 99 | 100 |
| 7 | 7 | 8 | 26 | 12 | 12 | 17 | 76 | 78 | 96 | 96 |
| 9 | 7 | 9 | 29 | 1 | 50 | 15 | 134 | 115 | 90 | 94 |
| 10 | 4 | 5 | 60 | 0 | 16 | 17 | 126 | 120 | 98 | 98 |
PDT Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy, RVD SD Regional ventilation delay standard deviation, CW Compliance win, CL Compliance loss, ΔEELI End-expiratory lung impedance change, s Second, C Compliance, SpO Pulse oximetry
Demographic characteristics of the study population and parameters associated with percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy
| Patient number | Weight kg | IBW kg | Brain diagnoses | ETT size | V days | MAP torr | NA | Trach tube |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 90 | 61 | Stroke | 7.5 | 3 | 110 | 0 | 8.5 |
| 2 | 140 | 64 | Tumour | 8.5 | 5 | 75 | NA | 9 |
| 3 | 80 | 66 | Trauma | 8.5 | 6 | 86 | NA | 9 |
| 4 | 77 | 62 | Stroke | 8.5 | 6 | 110 | 0 | 9 |
| 5 | 70 | 68 | Stroke | 8.5 | 5 | 83 | 0 | 9 |
| 6 | 75 | 60 | Trauma | 8.5 | 7 | 65 | 0 | 8.5 |
| 7 | 61 | 71 | Stroke | 8.5 | 7 | 70 | NA | 8.5 |
| 8 | 100 | 76 | Stroke | 9 | 9 | 96 | 0 | 9 |
| 9 | 100 | 64 | Stroke | 9 | 7 | 73 | 0 | 8.5 |
| 10 | 90 | 66 | Stroke | 9 | 6 | 98 | 0 | 8 |
| 11 | 75 | 75 | Stroke | 9 | 13 | 93 | 0 | 7.5 |
IBW Ideal body weight, ETT Endotracheal tube, V Ventilation, MAP Mean arterial pressure, NA Noradrenaline, Trach tube Tracheal tube
Parameters in eleven patients in percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy
| Time | Modes | MV l/min | Ppeak cm H2O | VT ml | PEEP cm H2O | C static ml/cmH2O | FiO2% | SpO2% | EtCO2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T − 1 | ASV | 10.25 ± 2.62 | 16.27 ± 3.19 | 546.91 ± 90.67 | 5.09 ± 0.29 | 80.82 ± 32.56 | 0.41 ± 0.04 | 97.45 ± 3.00 | 36.95 ± 4.46 |
| T 1 | DuoPAP | 10.25 ± 2.20 | 15.91 ± 4.14 | 564.45 ± 79.29 | 5.09 ± 0.29 | 78.36 ± 41.83 | 1.00 ± 0.00 | 98.18 ± 1.95 | 36.48 ± 5.44 |
| T 2 | ASV | 10.24 ± 2.33 | 15.55 ± 3.77 | 535.45 ± 150.00 | 5.36 ± 0.88 | 80.91 ± 37.05 | 0.45 ± 0.12 | 97.27 ± 2.34 | 36.89 ± 4.68 |
| T 3 | ASV | 10.07 ± 2.29 | 15.18 ± 4.37 | 571.82 ± 141.77 | 5.36 ± 0.88 | 102.18 ± 49.28 | 0.44 ± 0.10 | 98.18 ± 1.59 | 36.55 ± 3.87 |
| T 4 | ASV | 9.92 ± 2.03 | 15.27 ± 3.98 | 568.45 ± 95.56 | 5.36 ± 0.88 | 92.64 ± 35.34 | 0.42 ± 0.07 | 98.00 ± 1.95 | 35.32 ± 3.52 |
| T 5 | ASV | 13.96 ± 2.62 | 15.18 ± 4.02 | 555.64 ± 125.64 | 5.27 ± 0.62 | 94.64 ± 31.83 | 0.42 ± 0.06 | 98.00 ± 2.17 | 35.05 ± 2.92 |
| T 6 | ASV | 10.59 ± 2.33 | 15.09 ± 4.06 | 600.18 ± 125.39 | 5.27 ± 0.62 | 92.00 ± 31.46 | 0.42 ± 0.06 | 97.45 ± 2.57 | 34.57 ± 4.01 |
| T 7 | ASV | 10.05 ± 1.95 | 15.00 ± 3.93 | 558.00 ± 118.00 | 5.27 ± 0.62 | 83.00 ± 32.32 | 0.42 ± 0.06 | 98.18 ± 2.04 | 33.95 ± 3,63 |
| T 8 | ASV | 10.56 ± 1.70 | 15.64 ± 3.47 | 555.18 ± 106.69 | 5.27 ± 0.62 | 85.91 ± 33.41 | 0.40 ± 0.03 | 97.73 ± 2.05 | 33.95 ± 4.83 |
T-1 - one hour before percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT), T1 during PDT, T2-8 hourly intervals, Mean ± Standard deviation, ASV Adaptive support ventilation, DuoPAP Duo Positive Airway Pressure, MV Minute ventilation, Ppeak Peak pressure, VT Tidal volume, C Compliance, FiO Fraction of inspired oxygen, EtCO End-tidal carbon dioxide concentration, SpO Pulse oximetry, EIT Electric impedance tomography
Comparison of X-rays pre- and post-percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy
| Patient number | Pre PDT | Post PDT |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Right basal area: progression of condensation. | Right basal area: bronchopneumonia with higher proportion of basal pleural effusion and hypoventilation. |
| 2 | No negative findings. | No negative findings. |
| 3 | Right base upper lobe: new inhomogeneous shading. Left caudal lung: pleural effusion and hypoventilation. | Right middle area: minimal regression of inhomogeneous shading. Left middle and lower area: slight regression of lower transparency with spontaneous pleural effusion. |
| 4 | No negative findings. | No negative findings. |
| 5 | Right lower area: minor progression of inflammation. | Right lower area: slight regression of inflammatory changes. |
| 6 | Right basal right area: pleural effusion. | Right middle and lower, left basal area: pleural effusion. |
| 7 | Right middle area: inflammation. | Right of upper lobe and left paracardical basal: bronchopneumonia. |
| 8 | Right middle area: small residual shadow. | Bilateral, bigger on right: pleural effusion. |
| 9 | Bilateral lower area: plate-like atelectases. | Left lower area: plate-like atelectases. |
| 10 | Basal right area: lower transparency. | Right basal: partial regression of lower transparency. |
| 11 | Bilateral basal area: spilled pleural effusion. | Bilateral, bigger on right, basal area: spilled pleural effusion. |