Xiuhua Lai1, Jiapeng Zhang2, Jing Chen3, Cuiwei Lai1, Chunping Huang1. 1. Meizhou People's Hospital (Huangtang Hospital), Meizhou Hospital Affiliated to Sun Yat-sen University, Meizhou, Guangdong, P. R. China. 2. Medical College of Jiaying University, Meizhou, Guangdong, P. R. China. 3. Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is prevalent worldwide, particularly among elderly women. Although electroacupuncture (EA) has been accepted by many patients and physicians in Asia, its efficacy for SUI has not been evaluated scientifically and systematically. We aimed to conduct a systematic evaluation of the efficacy and safety of EA treatment for women with SUI. METHODS: We retrieved publications up to February 2019 from seven databases. Randomized controlled trials for women with SUI treated by EA were included. Therapeutic effect, 1-hour urine leakage and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Short Form (ICIQ-SF) scores were the primary outcomes. The Cochrane Collection's RevMan 5.3 software was used to pool data. RESULTS: The 15 included articles demonstrated that EA for SUI was effective (odds ratio [OR], confidence interval [CI] = 5.64, 4.19-7.59; Ι2 = 22%). ICIQ-SF scores increased (standard mean difference, CI = -0.48, -0.62 to -0.33; Ι2 = 32%) and 1-hour urine leakage decreased (OR, CI = -4.14, -4.96 to -3.33; Ι2 = 78%) in patients undergoing EA compared with those receiving sham EA, physical exercise or medication. CONCLUSION: EA for women with SUI exhibited significant efficacy and safety for key outcomes.
OBJECTIVE:Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is prevalent worldwide, particularly among elderly women. Although electroacupuncture (EA) has been accepted by many patients and physicians in Asia, its efficacy for SUI has not been evaluated scientifically and systematically. We aimed to conduct a systematic evaluation of the efficacy and safety of EA treatment for women with SUI. METHODS: We retrieved publications up to February 2019 from seven databases. Randomized controlled trials for women with SUI treated by EA were included. Therapeutic effect, 1-hour urine leakage and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Short Form (ICIQ-SF) scores were the primary outcomes. The Cochrane Collection's RevMan 5.3 software was used to pool data. RESULTS: The 15 included articles demonstrated that EA for SUI was effective (odds ratio [OR], confidence interval [CI] = 5.64, 4.19-7.59; Ι2 = 22%). ICIQ-SF scores increased (standard mean difference, CI = -0.48, -0.62 to -0.33; Ι2 = 32%) and 1-hour urine leakage decreased (OR, CI = -4.14, -4.96 to -3.33; Ι2 = 78%) in patients undergoing EA compared with those receiving sham EA, physical exercise or medication. CONCLUSION: EA for women with SUI exhibited significant efficacy and safety for key outcomes.
Authors: Paul Abrams; Linda Cardozo; Magnus Fall; Derek Griffiths; Peter Rosier; Ulf Ulmsten; Philip van Kerrebroeck; Arne Victor; Alan Wein Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 8.661