Literature DB >> 33045222

A prospective, head-to-head comparison of 2 EUS-guided liver biopsy needles in vivo.

Soorya N Aggarwal1, Travis Magdaleno1, Farina Klocksieben2, Jennifer E MacFarlan3, Shanth Goonewardene4, Zachary Zator5, Shashin Shah5, Hiral N Shah5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Procedural standardization in endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB) is necessary to obtain core biopsy specimens for accurate diagnosis. The objective of this study was to directly compare the diagnostic yield of 2 EUS-LB fine-needle biopsy (FNB) systems in vivo.
METHODS: In this prospective, single-center study, 108 adult patients undergoing EUS-LB over a 1-year period were included. Each EUS-LB consisted of an EGD, followed by EUS-guided biopsy of the left lobe of the liver sequentially using 2 different 19-gauge needles: the fork-tip (SharkCore) and Franseen (Acquire) FNB systems. Specimens were then reviewed by a GI histopathologist to determine diagnostic adequacy as well as the number of complete portal tracts, specimen length, and degree of fragmentation.
RESULTS: In 79.4% of cases, the fork-tip FNB system yielded a final diagnosis compared with 97.2% of the Franseen FNB specimens (P < .001). The mean number of complete portal tracts in the fork-tip FNB samples was 7.07 compared with 9.59 in the Franseen FNB samples (P < .001). The mean specimen length was 13.86 mm for the fork-tip FNB and 15.81 mm for the Franseen FNB (P = .004). Cores were intact in 47.6% of the fork-tip FNB samples and in 75.2% of the Franseen FNB samples (P = .004).
CONCLUSIONS: In EUS-LB, we found that the 19-gauge Franseen FNB system resulted in a statistically significant increase in diagnostic adequacy compared with biopsy using the fork-tip FNB system.
Copyright © 2021 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33045222     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.09.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  2 in total

Review 1.  Update on endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy.

Authors:  Shiva Rangwani; Devarshi R Ardeshna; Khalid Mumtaz; Sean G Kelly; Samuel Y Han; Somashekar G Krishna
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 5.374

2.  EUS-guided liver biopsy using a modified wet heparin suction technique.

Authors:  Ali Zakaria; Abdulrahman Diab; Michael Dowd; Pushpak Taunk; Ali Abbas
Journal:  VideoGIE       Date:  2022-08-11
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.