Heather M O'Halloran1, Kenneth Kwong1, Richard A Veldhoen1,2,3, David M Maslove1,2,3. 1. Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada. 2. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada. 3. Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The eICU Collaborative Research Database is a publicly available repository of granular data from more than 200,000 ICU admissions. The quantity and variety of its entries hold promise for observational critical care research. We sought to understand better the data available within this resource to guide its future use. DESIGN: We conducted a descriptive analysis of the eICU Collaborative Research Database, including patient, practitioner, and hospital characteristics. We investigated the completeness of demographic and hospital data, as well as those values required to calculate an Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation score. We also assessed the rates of ventilation, intubation, and dialysis, and looked for potential errors in the vital sign data. SETTING: American ICUs that participated in the Philips Healthcare eICU program between 2014 and 2015. PATIENTS: A total of 139,367 individuals who were admitted to one of the 335 participating ICUs between 2014 and 2015. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Most encounters were from small- and medium-sized hospitals, and managed by nonintensivists. The median ICU length of stay was 1.57 days (interquartile range, 0.82-2.97 d). The median Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation IV-predicted ICU mortality was 2.2%, with an observed mortality of 5.4%. Rates of ventilation (20-33%), intubation (15-24%), and dialysis (3-5%) varied according to the query method used. Most vital sign readings fell into realistic ranges, with manually curated data less likely to contain implausible results than automatically entered data. CONCLUSIONS: Data in the eICU Collaborative Research Database are for the most part complete and plausible. Some ambiguity exists in determining which encounters are associated with various interventions, most notably mechanical ventilation. Caution is warranted in extrapolating findings from the eICU Collaborative Research Database to larger ICUs with higher acuity.
OBJECTIVES: The eICU Collaborative Research Database is a publicly available repository of granular data from more than 200,000 ICU admissions. The quantity and variety of its entries hold promise for observational critical care research. We sought to understand better the data available within this resource to guide its future use. DESIGN: We conducted a descriptive analysis of the eICU Collaborative Research Database, including patient, practitioner, and hospital characteristics. We investigated the completeness of demographic and hospital data, as well as those values required to calculate an Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation score. We also assessed the rates of ventilation, intubation, and dialysis, and looked for potential errors in the vital sign data. SETTING: American ICUs that participated in the Philips Healthcare eICU program between 2014 and 2015. PATIENTS: A total of 139,367 individuals who were admitted to one of the 335 participating ICUs between 2014 and 2015. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Most encounters were from small- and medium-sized hospitals, and managed by nonintensivists. The median ICU length of stay was 1.57 days (interquartile range, 0.82-2.97 d). The median Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation IV-predicted ICU mortality was 2.2%, with an observed mortality of 5.4%. Rates of ventilation (20-33%), intubation (15-24%), and dialysis (3-5%) varied according to the query method used. Most vital sign readings fell into realistic ranges, with manually curated data less likely to contain implausible results than automatically entered data. CONCLUSIONS: Data in the eICU Collaborative Research Database are for the most part complete and plausible. Some ambiguity exists in determining which encounters are associated with various interventions, most notably mechanical ventilation. Caution is warranted in extrapolating findings from the eICU Collaborative Research Database to larger ICUs with higher acuity.
Authors: Christopher M Sauer; Tariq A Dam; Leo A Celi; Martin Faltys; Miguel A A de la Hoz; Lasith Adhikari; Kirsten A Ziesemer; Armand Girbes; Patrick J Thoral; Paul Elbers Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2022-03-02 Impact factor: 9.296
Authors: Daniel Dankl; Richard Rezar; Behrooz Mamandipoor; Zhichao Zhou; Sarah Wernly; Bernhard Wernly; Venet Osmani Journal: Med Princ Pract Date: 2022-01-28 Impact factor: 2.132
Authors: Alexander Makhnevich; Amir Gandomi; Yiduo Wu; Michael Qiu; Daniel Jafari; Daniel Rolston; Adey Tsegaye; Negin Hajizadeh Journal: Am J Med Qual Date: 2022-03-11 Impact factor: 1.200