BACKGROUND: β-blocker use has been associated with improved outcomes in a number of different malignancies; however, the impact of β-blockade in esophageal cancer is not been well characterized. We compared the outcomes of esophageal cancer patients based on β-blocker usage. METHODS: The charts of all 418 patients treated with radiation for esophageal cancer at our institution from April 2010 to October 2018 were analyzed. Patients who underwent treatment with palliative intent or did not finish treatment were excluded. β-blocker use was determined from the medication list at time of pretreatment consultation. RESULTS: There were 291 esophageal cancer patients who received neoadjuvant/definitive chemoradiation therapy. The median follow-up for the cohort was 22.5 months (interquartile range: 9.6 to 41.0 mo). Within the cohort, 27.8% (n=81) of patients were taking β-blockers at the time of treatment. Those taking β-blockers had significantly improved distant control (22.2% vs. 37.9%; P=0.035). Concomitant β-blocker use was significantly associated with improved progression-free survival (P<0.001, hazard ratio=0.42 [0.27-0.66]) and overall survival (P=0.002, hazard ratio=0.55 [0.38-0.81]) on Cox regression analysis. Propensity score-matched pairs were created using tumor stage, nodal stage, sex, neoadjuvant versus definitive therapy, Karnofsky Performance Status, and aspirin use. This matched-pair analysis showed a significant progression-free survival (P=0.005) benefit in esophageal cancer patients taking β-blockers. CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent β-blocker use is common within patients receiving concurrent chemoradiation for esophageal cancer. Esophageal cancer patients who received chemoradiation while taking β-blockers demonstrated significant benefits in survival-based outcomes.
BACKGROUND: β-blocker use has been associated with improved outcomes in a number of different malignancies; however, the impact of β-blockade in esophageal cancer is not been well characterized. We compared the outcomes of esophageal cancer patients based on β-blocker usage. METHODS: The charts of all 418 patients treated with radiation for esophageal cancer at our institution from April 2010 to October 2018 were analyzed. Patients who underwent treatment with palliative intent or did not finish treatment were excluded. β-blocker use was determined from the medication list at time of pretreatment consultation. RESULTS: There were 291 esophageal cancer patients who received neoadjuvant/definitive chemoradiation therapy. The median follow-up for the cohort was 22.5 months (interquartile range: 9.6 to 41.0 mo). Within the cohort, 27.8% (n=81) of patients were taking β-blockers at the time of treatment. Those taking β-blockers had significantly improved distant control (22.2% vs. 37.9%; P=0.035). Concomitant β-blocker use was significantly associated with improved progression-free survival (P<0.001, hazard ratio=0.42 [0.27-0.66]) and overall survival (P=0.002, hazard ratio=0.55 [0.38-0.81]) on Cox regression analysis. Propensity score-matched pairs were created using tumor stage, nodal stage, sex, neoadjuvant versus definitive therapy, Karnofsky Performance Status, and aspirin use. This matched-pair analysis showed a significant progression-free survival (P=0.005) benefit in esophageal cancer patients taking β-blockers. CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent β-blocker use is common within patients receiving concurrent chemoradiation for esophageal cancer. Esophageal cancer patients who received chemoradiation while taking β-blockers demonstrated significant benefits in survival-based outcomes.
Authors: Thomas I Barron; Roisin M Connolly; Linda Sharp; Kathleen Bennett; Kala Visvanathan Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-05-31 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Lindsey A Torre; Rebecca L Siegel; Elizabeth M Ward; Ahmedin Jemal Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2015-12-14 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Lawrence S Engel; Wong-Ho Chow; Thomas L Vaughan; Marilie D Gammon; Harvey A Risch; Janet L Stanford; Janet B Schoenberg; Susan T Mayne; Robert Dubrow; Heidrun Rotterdam; A Brian West; Martin Blaser; William J Blot; Mitchell H Gail; Joseph F Fraumeni Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2003-09-17 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Cameron R MacDonald; Mark J Bucsek; Guanxi Qiao; Minhui Chen; Lauren Evans; Daniel J Greenberg; Taylor P Uccello; Nicholas G Battaglia; Bonnie L Hylander; Anurag K Singh; Edith M Lord; Scott A Gerber; Elizabeth A Repasky Journal: Radiat Res Date: 2019-04-25 Impact factor: 2.841
Authors: Eddy Pasquier; Joseph Ciccolini; Manon Carre; Sarah Giacometti; Raphaelle Fanciullino; Charlotte Pouchy; Marie-Pierre Montero; Cindy Serdjebi; Maria Kavallaris; Nicolas André Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2011-10
Authors: Austin J Iovoli; Gregory M Hermann; Sung Jun Ma; Alexis J Platek; Mark K Farrugia; Edwin Yau; Kimberly E Wooten; Hassan Arshad; Vishal Gupta; Moni A Kuriakose; Wesley L Hicks; Anurag K Singh Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2020-06-01
Authors: Minhui Chen; Guanxi Qiao; Bonnie L Hylander; Hemn Mohammadpour; Xiang-Yang Wang; John R Subjeck; Anurag K Singh; Elizabeth A Repasky Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2020-04-14 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Jeff F Zhang; Haiyang Sheng; Jianhong Chen; Hemn Mohammadpour; Sung Jun Ma; Mark K Farrugia; Shipra Gandhi; Elizabeth G Bouchard; Anurag K Singh; Elizabeth A Repasky; Thaer Khoury; Christine B Ambrosone; Song Yao Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-05-21 Impact factor: 6.575