Ravi Mandla1, Hongmei Ruan1, Giselle Galang1, Catherine Jung1, Tanvi Sinha2, Nicole R Stone3, Roland S Wu1,2, Brandon J Mannion4,5,6, Prasanna K R Allu1, Kevin Chang7, Ashwin Rammohan1, Marie B Shi1, Len A Pennacchio4,5,6, Brian L Black2,8, Vasanth Vedantham1,2. 1. Cardiology Division (G.G., R.M., H.R., C.J., R.S.W., P.K.R.A., A.R., M.B.S., V.V.), University of California, San Francisco. 2. Cardiovascular Research Institute (T.S., R.S.W., B.L.B., V.V.), University of California, San Francisco. 3. Gladstone Institute of Cardiovascular Disease, San Francisco, CA (N.R.S.). 4. Environmental and Systems Biology Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, CA (B.J.M., L.A.P.). 5. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Berkeley, CA (B.J.M., L.A.P.). 6. Comparative Biochemistry Program, University of California, Berkeley (B.J.M., L.A.P.). 7. School of Medicine (K.C.), University of California, San Francisco. 8. Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics (B.L.B.), University of California, San Francisco.
Abstract
RATIONALE: Cardiac pacemaker cells (PCs) in the sinoatrial node (SAN) have a distinct gene expression program that allows them to fire automatically and initiate the heartbeat. Although critical SAN transcription factors, including Isl1 (Islet-1), Tbx3 (T-box transcription factor 3), and Shox2 (short-stature homeobox protein 2), have been identified, the cis-regulatory architecture that governs PC-specific gene expression is not understood, and discrete enhancers required for gene regulation in the SAN have not been identified. OBJECTIVE: To define the epigenetic profile of PCs using comparative ATAC-seq (assay for transposase-accessible chromatin with sequencing) and to identify novel enhancers involved in SAN gene regulation, development, and function. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used ATAC-seq on sorted neonatal mouse SAN to compare regions of accessible chromatin in PCs and right atrial cardiomyocytes. PC-enriched assay for transposase-accessible chromatin peaks, representing candidate SAN regulatory elements, were located near established SAN genes and were enriched for distinct sets of TF (transcription factor) binding sites. Among several novel SAN enhancers that were experimentally validated using transgenic mice, we identified a 2.9-kb regulatory element at the Isl1 locus that was active specifically in the cardiac inflow at embryonic day 8.5 and throughout later SAN development and maturation. Deletion of this enhancer from the genome of mice resulted in SAN hypoplasia and sinus arrhythmias. The mouse SAN enhancer also directed reporter activity to the inflow tract in developing zebrafish hearts, demonstrating deep conservation of its upstream regulatory network. Finally, single nucleotide polymorphisms in the human genome that occur near the region syntenic to the mouse enhancer exhibit significant associations with resting heart rate in human populations. CONCLUSIONS: (1) PCs have distinct regions of accessible chromatin that correlate with their gene expression profile and contain novel SAN enhancers, (2) cis-regulation of Isl1 specifically in the SAN depends upon a conserved SAN enhancer that regulates PC development and SAN function, and (3) a corresponding human ISL1 enhancer may regulate human SAN function.
RATIONALE: Cardiac pacemaker cells (PCs) in the sinoatrial node (SAN) have a distinct gene expression program that allows them to fire automatically and initiate the heartbeat. Although critical SAN transcription factors, including Isl1 (Islet-1), Tbx3 (T-box transcription factor 3), and Shox2 (short-stature homeobox protein 2), have been identified, the cis-regulatory architecture that governs PC-specific gene expression is not understood, and discrete enhancers required for gene regulation in the SAN have not been identified. OBJECTIVE: To define the epigenetic profile of PCs using comparative ATAC-seq (assay for transposase-accessible chromatin with sequencing) and to identify novel enhancers involved in SAN gene regulation, development, and function. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used ATAC-seq on sorted neonatal mouse SAN to compare regions of accessible chromatin in PCs and right atrial cardiomyocytes. PC-enriched assay for transposase-accessible chromatin peaks, representing candidate SAN regulatory elements, were located near established SAN genes and were enriched for distinct sets of TF (transcription factor) binding sites. Among several novel SAN enhancers that were experimentally validated using transgenic mice, we identified a 2.9-kb regulatory element at the Isl1 locus that was active specifically in the cardiac inflow at embryonic day 8.5 and throughout later SAN development and maturation. Deletion of this enhancer from the genome of mice resulted in SAN hypoplasia and sinus arrhythmias. The mouse SAN enhancer also directed reporter activity to the inflow tract in developing zebrafish hearts, demonstrating deep conservation of its upstream regulatory network. Finally, single nucleotide polymorphisms in the human genome that occur near the region syntenic to the mouse enhancer exhibit significant associations with resting heart rate in human populations. CONCLUSIONS: (1) PCs have distinct regions of accessible chromatin that correlate with their gene expression profile and contain novel SAN enhancers, (2) cis-regulation of Isl1 specifically in the SAN depends upon a conserved SAN enhancer that regulates PC development and SAN function, and (3) a corresponding humanISL1 enhancer may regulate human SAN function.
Authors: Vincent W W van Eif; Sonia Stefanovic; Karel van Duijvenboden; Martijn Bakker; Vincent Wakker; Corrie de Gier-de Vries; Stéphane Zaffran; Arie O Verkerk; Bas J Boukens; Vincent M Christoffels Journal: Development Date: 2019-04-25 Impact factor: 6.868
Authors: Evgeny Z Kvon; Yiwen Zhu; Guy Kelman; Catherine S Novak; Ingrid Plajzer-Frick; Momoe Kato; Tyler H Garvin; Quan Pham; Anne N Harrington; Riana D Hunter; Janeth Godoy; Eman M Meky; Jennifer A Akiyama; Veena Afzal; Stella Tran; Fabienne Escande; Brigitte Gilbert-Dussardier; Nolwenn Jean-Marçais; Sanjarbek Hudaiberdiev; Ivan Ovcharenko; Matthew B Dobbs; Christina A Gurnett; Sylvie Manouvrier-Hanu; Florence Petit; Axel Visel; Diane E Dickel; Len A Pennacchio Journal: Cell Date: 2020-03-12 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Xingqun Liang; Gang Wang; Lizhu Lin; Jennifer Lowe; Qingquang Zhang; Lei Bu; Yihan Chen; Ju Chen; Yunfu Sun; Sylvia M Evans Journal: Circ Res Date: 2013-06-06 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Sven Heinz; Christopher Benner; Nathanael Spann; Eric Bertolino; Yin C Lin; Peter Laslo; Jason X Cheng; Cornelis Murre; Harinder Singh; Christopher K Glass Journal: Mol Cell Date: 2010-05-28 Impact factor: 17.970
Authors: Jason D Buenrostro; Paul G Giresi; Lisa C Zaba; Howard Y Chang; William J Greenleaf Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2013-10-06 Impact factor: 28.547
Authors: Ahmed I Mahmoud; Fatih Kocabas; Shalini A Muralidhar; Wataru Kimura; Ahmed S Koura; Suwannee Thet; Enzo R Porrello; Hesham A Sadek Journal: Nature Date: 2013-04-17 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Chukwuemeka G Anene-Nzelu; Mick C J Lee; Wilson L W Tan; Albert Dashi; Roger S Y Foo Journal: Nat Rev Cardiol Date: 2021-08-11 Impact factor: 32.419
Authors: Peter Hanna; Michael J Dacey; Jaclyn Brennan; Alison Moss; Shaina Robbins; Sirisha Achanta; Natalia P Biscola; Mohammed A Swid; Pradeep S Rajendran; Shumpei Mori; Joseph E Hadaya; Elizabeth H Smith; Stanley G Peirce; Jin Chen; Leif A Havton; Zixi Jack Cheng; Rajanikanth Vadigepalli; James Schwaber; Robert L Lux; Igor Efimov; John D Tompkins; Donald B Hoover; Jeffrey L Ardell; Kalyanam Shivkumar Journal: Circ Res Date: 2021-02-25 Impact factor: 17.367