| Literature DB >> 33043808 |
Abstract
The precise control of the cell cycle G2 phase to Mitosis (M phase) transition is central for cell fate determination. The commonly used methods for assessing G2 to M phase progression are based on synchronizing cells and involve perturbation of the natural cell cycle progression. Additionally, these methods are often time-consuming and labor-intensive. Here, we report a flow cytometry-based method that offers a kinetic analysis of G2 to M phase progression in asynchronous cells using nocodazole, 5-Ethynyl-2´-deoxyuridine staining, and histone H3 serine 28 phosphorylation (pH3) staining. Nocodazole is used to collect mitotic cells and prevent their progression into G1, at the same time EdU is added for use as a dump channel during analysis. The remaining cells can then be identified as either G1 or G2/M based on their DNA content. Finally, G2 and M phase cells can be separated based on a mitotic marker, phosphorylation of ser28 on histone H3. While developed to assay G2/M phase progression, this method also resolves G1/S phase progression with no additional steps other than analysis. Compared to double thymidine block, this method does not require extended pre-treatments and is compatible with a greater variety of cell lines, while at the same time offering enhanced consistency and temporal resolution.Entities:
Keywords: G2 phase; cell cycle; method; mitosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33043808 PMCID: PMC7714512 DOI: 10.1080/15384101.2020.1827510
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell Cycle ISSN: 1551-4005 Impact factor: 4.534
Figure 1.(a) Overarching diagram of workflow. (b) A conceptual diagram shows how G2 and M phase cells can be isolated. EdU incorporation marks S phase cells for exclusion during analysis, while nocodazole prevents cells from leaving M phase. (c) Hypothetical data using our method. (d) Hypothetical data from Quastler and Sherman’s Labeled Mitosis methods
Figure 2.(a) diagram and run time of typical first-day work flow. (b) diagram and run time of second-day work flow. Step run times only include time spent centrifuging and incubating samples, not time spent manipulating samples. Total run time includes typical sample manipulation time
Figure 3.An outline of standard gating strategy when analyzing samples. Example data is typical for HeLa cells incubated with EdU and nocodazole for 8 hours. (a) In the first plot cells (E1) are gated on forward and side scatter to separate them from debris. (b) Next, singlets (E2) are identified based on the ratio of height and area for the DNA stain. G1 doublets may be present as having similar height but increased area compared to G2 singlets, with S and G2 doublets being proportional. Mitotic cells form a sub population with reduced signal area but similar height. (c) DNA content is plotted against EdU incorporation to resolve G1, S and G2/M (R3) phases. (d) Finally, p-Histone H3 (ser 28) is plotted against forward scatter to resolve mitotic cells (R4) and G2 cells (not gated)
Figure 4.(a) representative flow plots at time points from 0 to 8 hours in HeLa cells under normal conditions. (b) A line plot of the same data showing the kinetics of G2 entry. (c) A plot of the percent of G2/M phase cells that have entered mitosis in the positive control sample across the 10 most recent experiments N = 25
| Stock concentration | Volume per mL buffer | Working concentration | |
|---|---|---|---|
| DDiH2O | - | 679 µL | - |
| Tris pH 8.5 | 1 M | 100 µL | 100 mM |
| Ascorbic acid | 500 mM | 200 µL | 100 mM |
| CuSO4 | 50 mM | 20 µL | 1 mM |
| Alexa 488 Azide | 1 mM | 1 µL | 1 µM |
| Stock concentration | Volume per mL buffer | Working concentration | |
|---|---|---|---|
| PBS | - | 947 µL | - |
| PI | 0.5 mg/mL | 40 µL | 0.02 mg/mL |
| RNAse A | 20 mg/mL | 10 µL | 0.2 mg/mL (~10Kunitz/mL) |
| Histone H3 antibody | - | 3 µL | - |
| Step | Problem | Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Very few cells remain in sample tube | 1.5 mL centrifuge tubes were used during sample preparation | Use polypropylene or polystyrene 5 mL round bottom tubes | |
| 70% ethanol was made with PBS instead of water | Use 70% ethanol made by adding DDiH2O | ||
| Cells were accidentally decanted along with buffer | Be careful to avoid dislodging the cell pellet before decanting | ||
| Cells show little or no fluorescence | incomplete permeabilization | If fixing with ethanol, fix for a longer time, at least 6 hours and preferably overnight | |
| If fixing and permeabilizing with an alternative method, such as formaldehyde and detergent, titrate up detergent concentration or incubation time. | |||
| PI fluorescence shows broad G1 and G2 populations | Incomplete permeabilization | Partially permeabilized cells may allow entry of PI and Fluorescent Azide but exclude RNAse and antibodies | |
| Incomplete RNA digestion | Do not subject RNAse solution to more than a few freeze-thaw cycles. | ||
| Sample includes a substantial population of dying cells | Dying cells will lose DNA content and can appear as comet tail shapes from G1 and G2 populations. | ||
| EdU fluorescence shows poor separation between S and other phases | Samples were left in BSA wash buffer for an extended period | Samples show reduced EdU staining the longer they are left in wash buffer. If the protocol must be paused for a short time, the EdU reaction buffer and PI/Antibody staining buffers are more suitable | |
| Cells failed to incorporate EdU | May be caused by treatments that inhibit DNA synthesis | ||
| Titrate EdU concentration during incubation | |||
| Samples are too concentrated in EdU reaction buffer | Increase the volume of EdU reaction buffer used to stain samples or reduce the number of cells in each sample. | ||
| p-Histone H3 staining shows poor separation | Samples are too concentrated in PI/Antibody staining buffer | Increase the volume of buffer used to stain samples, reduce the number of cells in each sample, or titrate up the amount of antibody add to the buffer. |