Björg Thordardottir1, Linda Stigen2, Trine A Magne3, Susanne G Johnson4, Astrid Gramstad5,6, Adrian W Gran4, Lene A Åsli5, Gry Mørk7, Tore Bonsaksen1,7,8. 1. Department of Occupational Therapy, Prosthetics and Orthotics, Faculty of Health Sciences, OsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway. 2. Department of Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Gjøvik, Norway. 3. Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway. 4. Department of Health and Function, Bachelor in Occupational Therapy, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway. 5. UiT - The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway. 6. Centre for Care Research, North, Tromsø, Norway. 7. Faculty of Health Studies, VID Specialized University, Sandnes, Norway. 8. Faculty of Social and Health Sciences, Department of Health and Nursing Sciences, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Elverum, Norway.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To support students' motivation towards constructive and persistent study efforts, their learning environment needs attention. AIM: To develop knowledge about occupational therapy students' perceptions of the learning environment and assess whether identified differences between education programs were stable or changed across the 3 years of study. METHODS: Norwegian occupational therapy students completed the Course Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) while in their first, second, and third years of study. Differences between programs were analysed with multivariate and univariate analysis of variance. RESULTS: Among the first-year students, perceptions of the learning environment differed significantly between the six programs on five out of six scales. Apart from a continued difference on overall study satisfaction, the initial differences were no longer significant 1 year later. Differences on three scales (emphasis on independence, appropriate workload, and generic skills) were present in the third year of study. CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE: Students' perceptions of the learning environment became more similar over time, during the first 2 years of study, possibly reflecting that the students have become more accustomed to the student role and to the culture and requirements of the education programs. However, differences between study sites re-occurring in the third year suggest that group-based comparisons of learning environment perceptions across time may be inconclusive.
BACKGROUND: To support students' motivation towards constructive and persistent study efforts, their learning environment needs attention. AIM: To develop knowledge about occupational therapy students' perceptions of the learning environment and assess whether identified differences between education programs were stable or changed across the 3 years of study. METHODS: Norwegian occupational therapy students completed the Course Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) while in their first, second, and third years of study. Differences between programs were analysed with multivariate and univariate analysis of variance. RESULTS: Among the first-year students, perceptions of the learning environment differed significantly between the six programs on five out of six scales. Apart from a continued difference on overall study satisfaction, the initial differences were no longer significant 1 year later. Differences on three scales (emphasis on independence, appropriate workload, and generic skills) were present in the third year of study. CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE: Students' perceptions of the learning environment became more similar over time, during the first 2 years of study, possibly reflecting that the students have become more accustomed to the student role and to the culture and requirements of the education programs. However, differences between study sites re-occurring in the third year suggest that group-based comparisons of learning environment perceptions across time may be inconclusive.
Entities:
Keywords:
Higher education; learning environment; students
Authors: Linda Stigen; Gry Mørk; Tove Carstensen; Trine A Magne; Astrid Gramstad; Susanne G Johnson; Milada C Småstuen; Tore Bonsaksen Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2022-04-25 Impact factor: 3.263
Authors: Elaina DaLomba; Astrid Gramstad; Susanne G Johnson; Tove Carstensen; Linda Stigen; Gry Mørk; Trine A Magne; Tore Bonsaksen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-06-25 Impact factor: 3.240