Literature DB >> 33043626

Let's Talk About Sex-Biological Sex Is Underreported in Biomaterial Studies.

Bryan D James1, Paxton Guerin1, Josephine B Allen1.   

Abstract

Precision medicine aims to better individualize healthcare. It requires that biomaterials be designed for the physiological characteristics of a specific patient. To make this a reality, biomaterials research and development must address differences of biological sex. More specifically, biomaterials should be designed with properties optimized and appropriate for male and female patients. In analyzing research articles from seven prominent biomaterials journals, sex as a biological variable is missing from an overwhelming majority of in vitro biomaterial studies. From the survey, the reporting of the sex of primary cell cultures happened only 10.3% of the time. Contributing to this trend is that commercial vendors bias cell lines toward one sex or another by not disclosing information of cell line sex at the time of purchase; researchers do not communicate this pertinent information in published studies; and many journal policies have little to no requirements for reporting cell line characteristics. Omitting this valuable information leads to a gap in the understanding of sex-specific cell-biomaterial interactions and it creates a bias in research findings towards one sex or another. To curb this concerning trend and make precision biomaterials a reality will require the biomaterials field to "talk about sex" by reporting cell sex more broadly.
© 2020 Wiley-VCH GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cell-material interactions; hormones; patient-specific; precision biomaterials; sex differences

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33043626      PMCID: PMC7791002          DOI: 10.1002/adhm.202001034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater        ISSN: 2192-2640            Impact factor:   9.933


  112 in total

Review 1.  Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate.

Authors:  Dennis E Discher; Paul Janmey; Yu-Li Wang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Opinion: Sex inclusion in basic research drives discovery.

Authors:  Sabra L Klein; Londa Schiebinger; Marcia L Stefanick; Larry Cahill; Jayne Danska; Geert J de Vries; Melina R Kibbe; Margaret M McCarthy; Jeffrey S Mogil; Teresa K Woodruff; Irving Zucker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Does cellular sex matter? Dimorphic transcriptional differences between female and male endothelial cells.

Authors:  Mario Lorenz; Janina Koschate; Katharina Kaufmann; Corinna Kreye; Michael Mertens; Wolfgang M Kuebler; Gert Baumann; Gabriele Gossing; Alex Marki; Andreas Zakrzewicz; Christian Miéville; Andreas Benn; Daniel Horbelt; Paul R Wratil; Karl Stangl; Verena Stangl
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 5.162

4.  Moving hydrogels to the fourth dimension.

Authors:  Jonathan H Galarraga; Jason A Burdick
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 43.841

5.  Harnessing traction-mediated manipulation of the cell/matrix interface to control stem-cell fate.

Authors:  Nathaniel Huebsch; Praveen R Arany; Angelo S Mao; Dmitry Shvartsman; Omar A Ali; Sidi A Bencherif; José Rivera-Feliciano; David J Mooney
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2010-04-25       Impact factor: 43.841

6.  Sex Bias in Interventional Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Vivek S Prakash; Neel A Mansukhani; Irene B Helenowski; Teresa K Woodruff; Melina R Kibbe
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 2.681

7.  Human serum alters cell culture behavior and improves spheroid formation in comparison to fetal bovine serum.

Authors:  Julia I Heger; Karolin Froehlich; Jana Pastuschek; Astrid Schmidt; Christin Baer; Ralf Mrowka; Claudia Backsch; Ekkehard Schleußner; Udo R Markert; André Schmidt
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 3.905

Review 8.  The Immune System and Its Contribution to Variability in Regenerative Medicine.

Authors:  Erika M Moore; David R Maestas; Hannah Y Comeau; Jennifer H Elisseeff
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 7.376

Review 9.  Gender Disparities in Osteoporosis.

Authors:  Khaled A Alswat
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2017-04-01

10.  Gender differences in fibrosis remodeling in patients with long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Zhi Li; Zengwei Wang; Zongtao Yin; Yuji Zhang; Xiaodong Xue; Jinsong Han; Yan Zhu; Jian Zhang; Maximilian Y Emmert; Huishan Wang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-03-17
View more
  9 in total

1.  Genes That Escape X Chromosome Inactivation Modulate Sex Differences in Valve Myofibroblasts.

Authors:  Brian A Aguado; Cierra J Walker; Joseph C Grim; Megan E Schroeder; Dilara Batan; Brandon J Vogt; Andrea Gonzalez Rodriguez; Jessica A Schwisow; Karen S Moulton; Robert M Weiss; Donald D Heistad; Leslie A Leinwand; Kristi S Anseth
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Based Models for Studying Sex-Specific Differences in Neurodegenerative Diseases.

Authors:  Erkan Kiris
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 3.650

Review 3.  Nanomaterials alleviating redox stress in neurological diseases: mechanisms and applications.

Authors:  Yanping Jiang; Yiyuan Kang; Jia Liu; Suhan Yin; Zhendong Huang; Longquan Shao
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 9.429

Review 4.  Matters of the heart: Cellular sex differences.

Authors:  Cierra J Walker; Megan E Schroeder; Brian A Aguado; Kristi S Anseth; Leslie A Leinwand
Journal:  J Mol Cell Cardiol       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 5.763

Review 5.  Improving kidney targeting: The influence of nanoparticle physicochemical properties on kidney interactions.

Authors:  Yi Huang; Jonathan Wang; Kairui Jiang; Eun Ji Chung
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 11.467

6.  Ancestral Background Is Underreported in Regenerative Engineering.

Authors:  Holly Ryan; Daniel Bister; Sophia A Holliday; Jessica Boehlein; Aljae Lewis; Justin Silberman; Josephine B Allen; Erika Moore
Journal:  Regen Eng Transl Med       Date:  2021-11-09

Review 7.  A framework for developing sex-specific engineered heart models.

Authors:  Roberta Lock; Hadel Al Asafen; Sharon Fleischer; Manuel Tamargo; Yimu Zhao; Milica Radisic; Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic
Journal:  Nat Rev Mater       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 76.679

Review 8.  The Next Frontier in Health Disparities-A Closer Look at Exploring Sex Differences in Glioma Data and Omics Analysis, from Bench to Bedside and Back.

Authors:  Maria Diaz Rosario; Harpreet Kaur; Erdal Tasci; Uma Shankavaram; Mary Sproull; Ying Zhuge; Kevin Camphausen; Andra Krauze
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2022-08-30

9.  Sex-Specific Response to Combinations of Shear Stress and Substrate Stiffness by Endothelial Cells In Vitro.

Authors:  Bryan D James; Josephine B Allen
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 11.092

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.