| Literature DB >> 33043417 |
Pedro Hercílio de Oliveira Cavalcante1,2, Maralina Torres da Silva1,2, Aldenice de Nazaré Silva Pereira3, Rosana Gentile4, Cláudia Portes Santos5.
Abstract
Structure of the helminth community and analyses of helminth population parameters of Pimelodus blochii collected in the Xapuri River in comparison with those in the Acre River were evaluated. Eight adult helminth species were found parasitizing P. blochii in the Acre River: the nematodes Orientatractis moraveci, Rondonia rondoni, Philometroides acreanensis, Cucullanus (Cucculanus) pinai pinai, Procamallanus (Spirocamallanus) pimelodus, Rhadochona acuminata, and Brasilnema sp., and the trematode Dadaytrema oxycephala. For Xapuri's fishes, nine helminth species were found: the nematodes O. moraveci, R. rondoni, C. (C.) pinai pinai, Procamallanus (Spirocamallanus) rarus, P. (S.) pimelodus, R. acuminata, Brasilnema sp., and Cystidicolidae gen. sp., and the trematode D. oxycephala. Nematode and Acanthocephala larvae were also reported. Helminth abundance, prevalence, and diversity were influenced by seasonality and locality (river). The helminth parasites from Acre's fishes formed a subset of the helminth community of the Xapuri's. The results indicate an influence of the environmental characteristics of the rivers on the helminth community structure and diversity. This is the first study of the parasite community of P. blochii in the Xapuri River. The paretheses of (Spirocamallanus) and (S.) should not be in italics all along the text and tables.Entities:
Keywords: Acre River; Freshwater fish; Host-parasite relationship; Western Amazonia; Xapuri River
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33043417 PMCID: PMC7704492 DOI: 10.1007/s00436-020-06906-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasitol Res ISSN: 0932-0113 Impact factor: 2.289
Fig. 1Study area of the helminth fauna of Pimelodus blochii, State of Acre, Brazil, indicating the location of Acre, Xapuri, Iaco, and Purus Rivers in Brazil. Adapted from Macêdo et al. (2013)
Mean abundance, mean intensity (± SD), and prevalence (± 95% CI) for the helminth fauna of Pimelodus blochii in the Acre River, State of Acre, Brazil. (-) indicates that the parameter was not estimated
| Acre river | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameters | Species | |||||||
| Total | ||||||||
| Prevalence | 14.17 (0.09) | 7.50 (0.01) | 0.83 (0.0) | 5.00 (0.0) | 12.50 (0.02) | 5.00 (0.0) | 2.50 (0.0) | 3.33 (0.0) |
| Mean abundance | 3.51 ± 6.17 | 0.45 ± 0.83 | 0.02 ± 0.03 | 0.08 ± 0.16 | 0.72 ± 1.25 | 0.08 ± 0.14 | 0.03 ± 0.05 | 0.08 ± 0.16 |
| Mean intensity | 24.76 ± 25.08 | 6.00 ± 5.33 | 2.00 ± 0 | 1.67 ± 0.89 | 5.73 ± 5.56 | 1.50 ± 0.50 | 1.00 ± 0 | 2.50 ± 0.75 |
| Total abundance | 421 | 54 | 2 | 10 | 86 | 9 | 3 | 10 |
| Aggregation index | 76.54 | 12.66 | - | - | 10.49 | - | - | - |
| Parameters | Species | |||||||
| Dry season | ||||||||
| Prevalence | 10.83 (0.12) | 4.17 (0.03) | 0.83 (0.0) | 2.50 (0.0) | 4.17 (0.03) | 2.50 (0.0) | 1.67 (0.0) | |
| Mean abundance | 2.20 ± 7.21 | 0.38 ± 1.41 | 0.02 ± 0.07 | 0.06 ± 0.22 | 0.37 ± 1.34 | 0.03 ± 0.13 | 0.02 ± 0.66 | |
| Mean intensity | 20.31 ± 14.87 | 9.20 ± 3.32 | 2.00 ± 0.26 | 2.33 ± 0.56 | 8.80 ± 3.20 | 1.33 ± 0.31 | 1.00 ± 0.18 | |
| Total abundance | 264 | 46 | 2 | 7 | 44 | 4 | 2 | |
| Parameters | Species | |||||||
| Rainy season | ||||||||
| Prevalence | 3.33 (0.14) | 3.33 (0.0) | 2.50 (0.0) | 8.33 (0.02) | 2.50 (0.0) | 0.83 (0.0) | 3.33 (0.01) | |
| Mean abundance | 1.31 ± 4.94 | 0.07 ± 0.25 | 0.03 ± 0.09 | 0.35 ± 1.17 | 0.04 ± 0.16 | 0.01 ± 0.03 | 0.08 ± 0.31 | |
| Mean intensity | 39.25 ± 17.85 | 2.00 ± 0.54 | 1.00 ± 0.22 | 4.20 ± 2.21 | 1.67 ± 0.38 | 1.00 ± 0.13 | 2.50 ± 0.67 | |
| Total abundance | 157 | 8 | 3 | 42 | 5 | 1 | 10 | |
Mean abundance, mean intensity (± SD), and prevalence (± 95% CI) for the helminth fauna of Pimelodus blochii in the Xapuri River, State of Acre, Brazil. (-) indicates that the parameter was not estimated
| Xapuri river | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameters | Species | ||||||||
| Total | Cystidicolidae gen. sp. | ||||||||
| Prevalence | 23.33 (0.017) | 19.17 (0.17) | 1.67 (0.0) | 0.83 (0.02) | 35.83 | 5.83 (0.0) | 15.00 (0.05) | 1.67 (0.0) | 2.50 (0.0) |
| Mean abundance | 6.91 ± 11.75 | 5.82 ± 10.24 | 0.08 ± 0.16 | 0.01 ± 0.02 | 1.79 ± 2.43 | 0.11 ± 0.20 | 2.58 ± 4.51 | 0.02 ± 0.03 | 0.03 ± 0.06 |
| Mean intensity | 29.61 ± 32.22 | 30.35 ± 39.82 | 5.00 ± 3.00 | 1.00 ± 0 | 5.00 ± 0 | 1.86 ± 1.22 | 17.17 ± 1.57 | 1.00 ± 0 | 1.33 ± 0.44 |
| Total abundance | 829 | 698 | 10 | 1 | 215 | 13 | 309 | 2 | 4 |
| Aggregation index | 121.60 | 153.21 | - | - | 9.22 | - | 34.37 | - | - |
| Parameters | Species | ||||||||
| Dry season | Cystidicolidae gen. sp. | ||||||||
| Prevalence | 13.33 (0.16) | 15.00 (0.25) | 0.83 (0.0) | 12.50 (0.02) | 4.17 (0.01) | 4.17 (0.0) | 1.67 (0.0) | 0.83 (0.0) | |
| Mean abundance | 3.38 ± 11.29 | 3.85 ± 12.73 | 0.01 ± 0.03 | 0.57 ± 1.73 | 0.08 ± 0.31 | 0.04 ± 0.15 | 0.02 ± 0.06 | 0.02 ± 0.07 | |
| Mean intensity | 25.31 ± 20.21 | 25.67 ± 30.66 | 1.00 ± 0.13 | 4.53 ± 2.94 | 2.00 ± 0.81 | 1.00 ± 0.28 | 1.00 ± 0.18 | 2.00 ± 0.26 | |
| Total abundance | 405 | 462 | 1 | 68 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 2 | |
| Parameters | Species | ||||||||
| Rainy season | |||||||||
| Prevalence | 10.00 (0.29) | 4.17 (0.24) | 1.67 (0.01) | 23.33 (0.04) | 1.67 (0.0) | 10.83 (0.10) | 1.67 (0.0) | ||
| Mean abundance | 3.53 ± 12.22 | 1.97 ± 1.97 | 0.08 ± 0.32 | 1.23 ± 2.90 | 0.03 ± 0.10 | 2.53 ± 7.94 | 0.02 ± 0.06 | ||
| Mean intensity | 35.33 ± 35.86 | 47.20 ± 29.16 | 5.00 ± 1.06 | 5.25 ± 4.88 | 1.50 ± 0.29 | 23.38 ± 12.88 | 1.00 ± 0.18 | ||
| Total abundance | 424 | 236 | 10 | 147 | 3 | 304 | 2 | ||
Generalized linear models (GLMs) of the effects of location (Acre and Xapuri Rivers) and season (rainy and dry) on the helminth abundance of Pimelodus blochii, in Acre and Xapuri Rivers, State of Acre, Brazil. Plausible models (∆AICc < 2) are in italics
| AICc | ∆ AICc | w AICc | |
|---|---|---|---|
| | |||
| | |||
| River + season | 2203.4 | 2.8 | 0.11 |
| Season | 2202.6 | 2.0 | 0.16 |
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| Season | 2153.8 | 3.2 | 0.10 |
| | |||
| | |||
| Null | 1285.60 | 3.70 | 0.12 |
| Season | 1285.60 | 3.70 | 0.12 |
| | |||
| Season | 1594.8 | 6.50 | 0.04 |
| River | 1595.4 | 7.10 | 0.03 |
| Null | 1601,7 | 13,40 | 0,00 |
Fig. 2Sample-based rarefaction curves of helminth species richness (± 95 % CI) of Pimelodus blochii, in Acre and Xapuri Rivers, State of Acre, Brazil
Diversity indices of the helminth species of Pimelodus blochii in Acre and Xapuri Rivers, State of Acre, Brazil
| Acre River | Dry season | Rainy season |
| Total richness | 7 | 7 |
| Chao-1 estimated richness | 7 | 7 |
| Shannon diversity index | 0.933 | 0.987 |
| Equitability index | 0.479 | 0.507 |
| Berger-Parker dominance index | 0.715 | 0.694 |
| Xapuri River | Dry season | Rainy season |
| Total richness | 8 | 7 |
| Chao-1 estimated richness | 8 | 7 |
| Shannon diversity index | 1.011 | 1.384 |
| Equitability index | 0.486 | 0.711 |
| Berger-Parker dominance index | 0.483 | 0.376 |
| Total | Acre River | Xapuri River |
| Total richness | 8 | 9 |
| Chao-1 estimated richness | 8 | 9 |
| Mean richness | 0.51 | 1.06 |
| Shannon diversity index | 0.988 | 1.331 |
| Equitability index | 0.475 | 0.605 |
| Berger-Parker dominance index | 0.707 | 0.398 |
Indices of importance of the helminth species of Pimelodus blochii in Acre and Xapuri Rivers, State of Acre, Brazil
| Index of importance | Classification | |
|---|---|---|
| Acre River | ||
| | 78.67 | Dominant |
| | 5.34 | Dominant |
| | 0.02 | Co-dominant |
| | 0.66 | Co-dominant |
| | 14.18 | Dominant |
| | 0.59 | Co-dominant |
| | 0.10 | Co-dominant |
| | 0.44 | Co-dominant |
| | 0.00 | Unsuccessful pioneer |
| | 0.00 | Unsuccessful pioneer |
| Nematoda. gen. sp. | 0.00 | Unsuccessful pioneer |
| Acanthocephala gen. sp. | 0.00 | Unsuccessful pioneer |
| Xapuri River | ||
| | 42.83 | Dominant |
| | 29.62 | Dominant |
| | 0.04 | Co-dominant |
| | 0.00 | Subordinate |
| | 17.06 | Dominant |
| | 0.17 | Co-dominant |
| | 10.26 | Dominant |
| Cystidicolidae gen. sp | 0.01 | Subordinate |
| | 0.02 | Co-dominant |
| | 0.00 | Unsuccessful pioneer |
| | 0.00 | Unsuccessful pioneer |
| | 0.00 | Unsuccessful pioneer |
| Nematoda | 0.00 | Unsuccessful pioneer |
| Acanthocephala gen. sp. | 0.00 | Unsuccessful pioneer |