Literature DB >> 33043370

Determining sample size and length of follow-up for smartphone-based digital phenotyping studies.

Ian Barnett1, John Torous2, Harrison T Reeder3, Justin Baker4, Jukka-Pekka Onnela3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Studies that use patient smartphones to collect ecological momentary assessment and sensor data, an approach frequently referred to as digital phenotyping, have increased in popularity in recent years. There is a lack of formal guidelines for the design of new digital phenotyping studies so that they are powered to detect both population-level longitudinal associations as well as individual-level change points in multivariate time series. In particular, determining the appropriate balance of sample size relative to the targeted duration of follow-up is a challenge.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used data from 2 prior smartphone-based digital phenotyping studies to provide reasonable ranges of effect size and parameters. We considered likelihood ratio tests for generalized linear mixed models as well as for change point detection of individual-level multivariate time series.
RESULTS: We propose a joint procedure for sequentially calculating first an appropriate length of follow-up and then a necessary minimum sample size required to provide adequate power. In addition, we developed an accompanying accessible sample size and power calculator. DISCUSSION: The 2-parameter problem of identifying both an appropriate sample size and duration of follow-up for a longitudinal study requires the simultaneous consideration of 2 analysis methods during study design.
CONCLUSION: The temporally dense longitudinal data collected by digital phenotyping studies may warrant a variety of applicable analysis choices. Our use of generalized linear mixed models as well as change point detection to guide sample size and study duration calculations provide a tool to effectively power new digital phenotyping studies.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  digital phenotyping; longitudinal studies; mobile health; sample size; study design

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33043370      PMCID: PMC7727382          DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  9 in total

Review 1.  Working definitions, subjective and objective assessments and experimental paradigms in a study exploring social withdrawal in schizophrenia and Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Nic J A van der Wee; Amy C Bilderbeck; Maria Cabello; Jose L Ayuso-Mateos; Ilja M J Saris; Erik J Giltay; Brenda W J H Penninx; Celso Arango; Anke Post; Stefano Porcelli
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2018-06-24       Impact factor: 8.989

2.  Relapse prediction in schizophrenia through digital phenotyping: a pilot study.

Authors:  Ian Barnett; John Torous; Patrick Staples; Luis Sandoval; Matcheri Keshavan; Jukka-Pekka Onnela
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 7.853

3.  Opportunities and needs in digital phenotyping.

Authors:  Lisa A Marsch
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 7.853

4.  Sample size considerations for n-of-1 trials.

Authors:  Stephen Senn
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 3.021

5.  Power analysis for generalized linear mixed models in ecology and evolution.

Authors:  Paul C D Johnson; Sarah J E Barry; Heather M Ferguson; Pie Müller
Journal:  Methods Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 7.781

6.  New Tools for New Research in Psychiatry: A Scalable and Customizable Platform to Empower Data Driven Smartphone Research.

Authors:  John Torous; Mathew V Kiang; Jeanette Lorme; Jukka-Pekka Onnela
Journal:  JMIR Ment Health       Date:  2016-05-05

Review 7.  Using wearable technology to predict health outcomes: a literature review.

Authors:  Jason P Burnham; Chenyang Lu; Lauren H Yaeger; Thomas C Bailey; Marin H Kollef
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  A practical guide and power analysis for GLMMs: detecting among treatment variation in random effects.

Authors:  Morgan P Kain; Ben M Bolker; Michael W McCoy
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Health App Use Among US Mobile Phone Owners: A National Survey.

Authors:  Paul Krebs; Dustin T Duncan
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 4.773

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Piloting Smartphone Digital Phenotyping to Understand Problematic Internet Use in an Adolescent and Young Adult Sample.

Authors:  Meredith Gansner; Melanie Nisenson; Vanessa Lin; Nicholas Carson; John Torous
Journal:  Child Psychiatry Hum Dev       Date:  2022-01-19

2.  Capturing Cognitive Aging in Vivo: Application of a Neuropsychological Framework for Emerging Digital Tools.

Authors:  Katherine Hackett; Tania Giovannetti
Journal:  JMIR Aging       Date:  2022-09-07

Review 3.  Enrollment and Retention of Participants in Remote Digital Health Studies: Scoping Review and Framework Proposal.

Authors:  Paola Daniore; Vasileios Nittas; Viktor von Wyl
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 7.076

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.