Literature DB >> 3304324

Wound dressing adherence: a clinical comparative study.

W D Malone.   

Abstract

This prospective study was undertaken to compare the adherence of dressings currently used as non-adherent dressings. Four different dressings were studied on a total of 40 patients. An overall adherence of 50% was encountered, Silicon Polymer Foam being the most successful under the trial conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1987        PMID： 3304324      PMCID： PMC1285415          DOI： 10.1136/emj.4.2.101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Emerg Med        ISSN： 0264-4924


  3 in total

1.  A note on wound healing under dressings with special reference to perforated-film dressings.

Authors:  G D Winter
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  1965-10       Impact factor: 8.551

2.  Melolin trial.

Authors:  M Gentle
Journal:  Nurs Mirror Midwives J       Date:  1970-07-31

Review 3.  What materials for dressings?

Authors:  J C Lawrence
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 2.586
  3 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  A dressing history.

Authors:  Douglas Queen; Heather Orsted; Hiromi Sanada; Geoff Sussman
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Effect of non-adhering dressings on promotion of fibroblast proliferation and wound healing in vitro.

Authors:  Cornelia Wiegand; Martin Abel; Uta-Christina Hipler; Peter Elsner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 4.379
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.