| Literature DB >> 33042853 |
Romain Blaizot1,2, Cécile Nabet3, Laure Laghoe2, Benjamin Faivre4, Sandie Escotte-Binet5,6, Felix Djossou7, Emilie Mosnier8,9, Fanny Henaff4,8, Denis Blanchet1,2, Aurélien Mercier10,11, Marie-Laure Dardé10,11, Isabelle Villena5,6, Magalie Demar1,2.
Abstract
Background: Toxoplasma gondii is a parasite of worldwide importance but its burden in indigenous communities remains unclear. In French Guiana, atypical strains of T. gondii originating from a complex rainforest cycle involving wild felids have been linked to severe infections in humans. These cases of Amazonian toxoplasmosis are sporadic and outbreaks are rarely described. We report on the investigation of an outbreak of acute toxoplasmosis in a remote Amerindian village. We discuss the causes and consequences of this emergence.Entities:
Keywords: indigenous; outbreak; parasitology; rainforest (Amazon forest); toxoplasmosis
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33042853 PMCID: PMC7516351 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00401
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 5.293
Figure 1Map of the village of Camopi, provided by the Guiana Amazonian Park (Parc Amazonien de Guyane).
Epidemiological investigation of the 9 infected households, Camopi, French Guiana.
| Household 1 | 5 | 05/05/2017 | 5 ( | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 |
| Household 2 | 6 | 05/24/2017 | 2 ( | 0/6 | 4/6 | 1 (girl, age 14) |
| Household 3 | 6 | 05/17/2017 | 1 (child) | 1/6 | 4/6 | 0 |
| Household 4 | 6 | 05/31/2017 | 4 ( | 1/5 | 0/5 | 2 (pregnant woman and fetus |
| Household 5 | 5 | 05/29/2017 | 1 (adult) | 0/6 | 3/6 | 0 |
| Household 6 | 6 | 05/08/2017 | 2 (children) | 1/6 | 3/6 | 0 |
| Household 7 | 6 | 05/19/2017 | 3 ( | 0/6 | 1/6 | 1 |
| Household 8 | 7 | 06/20/2017 | 1 (child) | 3/7 | 3/7 | 0 |
| Household 9 | 8 | 06/20/2017 | 1 (child) | 2/6 | 4/6 | 0 |
One person refused sampling.
Two persons refused sampling.
Genotyped strain.
IgG+, positive T. gondii IgG antibodies; IgG–, negative T. gondii IgG antibodies; IgM+, positive T. gondii IgM antibodies; IgM–, negative T. gondii IgM antibodies; PCR+, positive T. gondii DNA detection by PCR.
Clinical and laboratory features of the 20 cases of acute toxoplasmosis, Camopi, French Guiana.
| Asymptomatic | 4/20 (20) |
| Fever | 15/20 (75) |
| Cough/Pneumonia | 8/20 (40) |
| Lymphadenopathy | 6/20 (30) |
| Headache | 6/20 (30) |
| Digestive signs | 5/20 (25) |
| Myalgia | 1/20 (5) |
| Conjunctivitis | 1/20 (5) |
| Skin rash | 1/20 (5) |
| Hepatomegaly | 1/20 (5) |
| 5/20 (25) | |
| Adults | 3/6 (50) |
| Children | 2/14 (14.3) |
| Positive | 20/20 (100) 780 (25.2–1814.4) 19.25 (4.1–31.0) |
| Hyponatremia | 6/20 (30) |
| Hepatic cytolysis | 6/20 (30) |
| Lymphocytosis | 3/20 (15) |
| Elevated creatine kinase | 3/20 (15) |
| High lactate dehydrogenase | 3/20 (15) |
| High C-reactive protein | 2/20 (10) |
| Eosinophilia | 2/20 (10) |
| Complete response | 20/20 (100) |
| Death | 0/20 (0) |
| 20/20 (100) |
Splenomegaly was not detected, but proper examination with an examination table was not possible in traditional houses.
One adult was hospitalized in the Dermatology Department (important skin rash), one in the Infectious Diseases Department, and a pregnant woman was treated in the Obstetrics Department.
Detection threshold: 3IU/mL (IgG) and 0.6 IU/mL (IgM).
All confirmed cases were treated with sulfamethoxazole (1,600 mg/d) and trimethoprim (320 mg/d) for 21 days. A fetus died at week 19 of pregnancy but was not included in this table of born patients.
Clearance of all symptoms after 21 days of treatment.
Figure 2Timeline of the investigation and epidemiological curve of tested and confirmed cases, Camopi toxoplasmosis outbreak, 2017.
Figure 3Neighbor-joining clustering of T. gondii strains from French Guiana, based on 15 microsatellite markers: circles and triangles correspond, respectively to strains of human and animal origin; black circles correspond to the 2 strains isolated during the Camopi outbreak with 15/15 markers amplified; red, green, and dark blue squares are reference strains of Type I, Type II, and Type III genotype, respectively.
Risk factors of toxoplasmosis of the 9 infected households, Camopi, French Guiana.
| Household 1 | Domestic cats ( | Boiling buccan | No | Deep well pump Brook | Caichiri Wasai juice | Wayampi |
| Household 2 | No | Boiling buccan stew | No | Rainwater tank Brook | Caichiri Wasai juice Sugar cane juice | Teko |
| Household 3 | Domestic kitten ( | Boiling stewing | Yes | Rainwater tank Brook | Caichiri | Teko |
| Household 4 | Domestic cats ( | Boiling | Caichiri only | Brook | Caichiri Sugar cane juice | Teko |
| Household 5 | Wild cat ( | Boiling buccan stew | Cramanioc only | Rainwater tank, brook | Caichiri | Wayampi |
| Household 6 | Puma Jaguarondi Domestic kitten ( | Boiling buccan | Yes | Deep well pump Brook | Caichiri | Wayampi |
| Household 7 | Puma | Boiling | No | Deep well pump | Caichiri | Teko |
| Household 8 | No | Boiling buccan | No | Deep well pump | Caichiri | Wayampi |
| Household 9 | No | Boiling buccan | No | Brook | Caichiri | Teko |
Results of Toxoplasma gondii PCR on environmental and meat samples collected during the outbreak investigation, Camopi village, French Guiana.
| Household 1 | Negative | Negative (3/3) | – | – | Negative (1 brook) | Negative (3/3) |
| Household 2 | – | – | – | – | Negative (1 brook) | Undetermined (1/1) (Ct 37.8) |
| Household 3 | Negative (2/2) | Negative (2/2) | – | – | – | Negative (3/3) |
| Household 4 | – | Negative (3/3) | Negative (1 fresh cassava) | – | ||
| Household 5 | Negative (1 kitten, 1 adult) | Negative (4/4) | Negative (1 fried cassava) | – | – | Undetermined (1/1) (Ct 39.4) |
| Household 6 | – | – | – | – | Negative (1 brook) | Negative (2/2) |
| Household 7 | – | – | – | – | – | Negative (2/2) |
| Household 8 | – | – | – | – | Negative (1 deep, 1 well pump) | Negative (2/2) |
| Household 9 | – | – | – | – | Undetermined (1/1) (Ct 38.2) | |
| Random soil samples | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Brazilian stores | – | – | – | – | – |
“Positive”, “negative” and “undetermined” corresponds to T. gondii PCR results. Number of tested samples and type of samples are indicated into brackets. Undetermined samples correspond to positivity of only one well over two duplicates.
Not assessed.
Cycle threshold.
Bold values correspond to positive PCR.