Literature DB >> 33041628

Safe Community Gardening Practices: Focus Groups with Garden Leaders in Atlanta, Georgia.

Candis M Hunter1, Dana Hz Williamson2, Melanie Pearson1, Eri Saikawa1,3, Matthew O Gribble1,4, Michelle Kegler2.   

Abstract

Although best management practices have been recommended by government agencies and non-profit organizations to reduce community gardeners' potential exposure to soil contaminants such as lead, some gardeners do not perform these practices. Understanding gardeners' beliefs and motivations is critical for effective promotion of safer gardening practices. This study, grounded in the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), employed five focus groups to investigate Atlanta community garden leaders' perspectives concerning three gardening practices: composting, hygiene behaviors, and mulching. These general practices are also considered safe gardening practices in that they can reduce exposure to toxicants in urban gardens. Qualitative analysis identified advantages and disadvantages; supporters and non-supporters; and barriers and facilitators that might influence gardeners' opinions regarding these behaviors. Gardeners expressed that more funding, volunteers, and training are needed to promote these behaviors. Gardeners noted that mulch and compost provided advantages such as improving soil quality, but a primary barrier was concern about contamination of source materials. Focus group participants did not directly associate composting and mulching with reduction of exposure to soil contaminants. Behavioral challenges related to hygiene included concerns about decreased exposure to salubrious bacteria, inadequate access to potable water, and limited availability of gloves and wipes. These study findings characterize factors that community garden stakeholders should consider when promoting safe gardening practices and interventions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Community gardens; Theory of Planned Behavior; beliefs; environmental psychology; soil contaminants; urban agriculture

Year:  2019        PMID: 33041628      PMCID: PMC7540182          DOI: 10.1080/13549839.2019.1688268

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Local Environ        ISSN: 1354-9839


  46 in total

1.  Using soilSHOPs to Reduce Community Exposures to Lead in Soils.

Authors:  Elena Vaouli; Ana Pomales-Schickli
Journal:  J Environ Health       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.179

Review 2.  Role of organic amendments on enhanced bioremediation of heavy metal(loid) contaminated soils.

Authors:  Jin Hee Park; Dane Lamb; Periyasamy Paneerselvam; Girish Choppala; Nanthi Bolan; Jae-Woo Chung
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 10.588

Review 3.  Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it.

Authors:  Philip M Podsakoff; Scott B MacKenzie; Nathan P Podsakoff
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 24.137

4.  Environmental Justice: the Economics of Race, Place, and Pollution.

Authors:  Spencer Banzhaf; Lala Ma; Christopher Timmins
Journal:  J Econ Perspect       Date:  2019

5.  Vegetable output and cost savings of community gardens in San Jose, California.

Authors:  Susan J Algert; Aziz Baameur; Marian J Renvall
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2014-04-19       Impact factor: 4.910

6.  VegeSafe: A community science program measuring soil-metal contamination, evaluating risk and providing advice for safe gardening.

Authors:  Marek Rouillon; Paul J Harvey; Louise J Kristensen; Steven G George; Mark P Taylor
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2016-12-24       Impact factor: 8.071

7.  Urban gardens: lead exposure, recontamination mechanisms, and implications for remediation design.

Authors:  Heather F Clark; Debra M Hausladen; Daniel J Brabander
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2008-05-05       Impact factor: 6.498

8.  Effect of biosolids processing on lead bioavailability in an urban soil.

Authors:  Sally Brown; Rufus L Chaney; Judith G Hallfrisch; Qi Xue
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.751

9.  Building a co-created citizen science program with gardeners neighboring a superfund site: The Gardenroots case study.

Authors:  Monica D Ramirez-Andreotta; Mark L Brusseau; Janick Artiola; Raina M Maier; A Jay Gandolfi
Journal:  Int Public Health J       Date:  2015-01

10.  Perspectives on Heavy Metal Soil Testing Among Community Gardeners in the United States: A Mixed Methods Approach.

Authors:  Candis M Hunter; Dana H Z Williamson; Matthew O Gribble; Halle Bradshaw; Melanie Pearson; Eri Saikawa; P Barry Ryan; Michelle Kegler
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 4.614

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Recovery of Banana Waste-Loss from Production and Processing: A Contribution to a Circular Economy.

Authors:  Sasha Alzate Acevedo; Álvaro José Díaz Carrillo; Edwin Flórez-López; Carlos David Grande-Tovar
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 4.411

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.