Literature DB >> 33041552

Shock Index in the Prediction of Adverse Maternal Outcome.

Monika Chaudhary1, Nandita Maitra1, Tosha Sheth1, Palak Vaishnav1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: WHO states that obstetric hemorrhage, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and sepsis account for approximately 50% of maternal deaths worldwide. All these conditions are associated with changes in vital signs including blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR). Shock index (SI) is the ratio of HR to systolic BP. AIMS AND
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate role of shock index as an early indicator of adverse maternal outcomes and to determine the threshold points of SI for five adverse maternal outcomes.
METHODOLOGY: This was a prospective observational study on 1004 consecutively enrolled subjects presenting in labor. Vital signs and Shock Index were recorded. SI thresholds were analyzed with respect to obstetric complications and adverse outcomes. Parametric tests such as Chi-square, comparison of proportions, comparison of mean and ROC curve analysis were applied on the data.
RESULTS: The mean SI value in the vaginal delivery group was 1.02 ± 0.26 and it was 0.95 ± 0.033 in the caesarean delivery group. The values of SI ((Mean and SD) for ICU admission were (1.23 (± 0.35)), for (MODS) it was (1.47 (± 0.84)), for blood transfusion > 4 units it was (1.15 (± 0.41)), for surgical intervention it was (1.58 (± 0.51)) and for maternal death (1.39 (± 0.85)). SI ≥ 1.4, had sensitivity 26.82% (21.09-33.19); specificity 100%(99.53-100), PPV was 100% and NPV was 82.96%(81.8-84.06)with an AUC of 0.8 (0.78-0.83) on ROC analysis. In subjects with PIH/eclampsia, SI was lower and in patients with severe anemia, SI was higher.
CONCLUSION: SI performed well as a screening tool in the prediction of adverse maternal outcomes. SI ≥ 0.9 was significantly associated with maternal adverse outcomes: ICU admission, MODS, surgical intervention, blood transfusion and death. The study proposes an SI cut-off of 0.9 for referral and a cut-off of 1.1 for intervention in a tertiary care hospital. Patients with PIH/eclampsia tend to have lower mean SI values as compared to the rest of the study population, suggesting that SI may not be a reliable indicator in patients with PIH/eclampsia. © Federation of Obstetric & Gynecological Societies of India 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse; Maternal outcome; Shock index

Year:  2020        PMID: 33041552      PMCID: PMC7515997          DOI: 10.1007/s13224-020-01355-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India        ISSN: 0975-6434


  9 in total

1.  Case-control study of shock index among women who did and did not receive blood transfusions due to postpartum hemorrhage.

Authors:  Anderson Borovac-Pinheiro; Rodolfo C Pacagnella; Carolina Puzzi-Fernandes; José G Cecatti
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 3.561

2.  Shock index and delta-shock index are superior to existing maternal early warning criteria to identify postpartum hemorrhage and need for intervention.

Authors:  Jaden R Kohn; Gary A Dildy; Catherine S Eppes
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2018-02-04

3.  Use of the "obstetric shock index" as an adjunct in identifying significant blood loss in patients with massive postpartum hemorrhage.

Authors:  Abigail Le Bas; Edwin Chandraharan; Anthony Addei; Sabaratnam Arulkumaran
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 3.561

4.  Implementation of WHO Near-Miss Approach for Maternal Health at a Tertiary Care Hospital: An Audit.

Authors:  Shilpa Venkatesh; Vani Ramkumar; C N Sheela; Annamma Thomas
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2015-03-15

5.  Shock index: an effective predictor of outcome in postpartum haemorrhage?

Authors:  H L Nathan; A El Ayadi; N L Hezelgrave; P Seed; E Butrick; S Miller; A Briley; S Bewley; A H Shennan
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 6.531

6.  Vital Sign Prediction of Adverse Maternal Outcomes in Women with Hypovolemic Shock: The Role of Shock Index.

Authors:  Alison M El Ayadi; Hannah L Nathan; Paul T Seed; Elizabeth A Butrick; Natasha L Hezelgrave; Andrew H Shennan; Suellen Miller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Shock index in the emergency department: utility and limitations.

Authors:  Erica Koch; Shannon Lovett; Trac Nghiem; Robert A Riggs; Megan A Rech
Journal:  Open Access Emerg Med       Date:  2019-08-14

8.  Shock index thresholds to predict adverse outcomes in maternal hemorrhage and sepsis: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Hannah L Nathan; Paul T Seed; Natasha L Hezelgrave; Annemarie De Greeff; Elodie Lawley; John Anthony; Wilhelm Steyn; David R Hall; Lucy C Chappell; Andrew H Shennan
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 3.636

Review 9.  Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis.

Authors:  Lale Say; Doris Chou; Alison Gemmill; Özge Tunçalp; Ann-Beth Moller; Jane Daniels; A Metin Gülmezoglu; Marleen Temmerman; Leontine Alkema
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 26.763

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.