| Literature DB >> 33041475 |
Sreehari Raman1,2,3, Thekke Thumbath Shameer4, Bipin Charles5, Raveendranathanpillai Sanil4.
Abstract
Salim Ali's fruit bat, Latidens salimalii, is a monotypic endangered fruit bat endemic to Western Ghats (WG) with an ambiguous distribution. The distribution range, habitat suitability, and biology of this species are still uncertain. Endemic species inhabiting the high elevation of WG like L. salimalii are threatened due to climatic change and seeks urgent management interventions. Hence, we developed a habitat suitability model for L. salimalii using MaxEnt in the current climate condition and projected their distribution for three Representation Concentration Pathway (RCP 4.5, 6.0, and 8.5) climate scenarios of the 2070 time frame. The results show that 9531 km2of habitat in WG is suitable for L. salimalii at present, while all the future scenarios estimates propose complete loss of highly suitable habitat. The significant factors influencing the distribution of L. salimalii are the precipitation of the driest month, tree density, rain in the coldest quarter, canopy height, and altitude. The study pioneers in predicting the suitable habitat and emphasis the need to develop strategies for the long-term conservation of endangered L. salimalii in WG under global warming scenarios. © International Society for Tropical Ecology 2020.Entities:
Keywords: Climate change; Endemic species; Habitat loss; Maxent; Western Ghats
Year: 2020 PMID: 33041475 PMCID: PMC7539283 DOI: 10.1007/s42965-020-00114-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trop Ecol ISSN: 0564-3295 Impact factor: 1.333
Fig. 1Locations of Latidens salimalii in the WG mountain chains in India
Fig. 2Portrait of Latidens salimalii (a), ventral view (b), dorsal view (c), lower jaw with one pair of incisor (d)
External measurements (mm) of L. salimalii recorded from Periyar Tiger Reserve and Silent Valley National Park in WG
| Measurements | Periyar Tiger Reserve | Silent Valley National Park | Bates and Harrison (1997) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forearm length | 69.3 | 70.2 | 67.3 |
| Head-body length | 111.8 | 108.7 | 106.7 |
| Ear | 17.8 | 17.1 | 16.8 |
| Tibia | 33.1 | 32.3 | NA |
| Hind foot | 13.2 | 13.1 | 13.4 |
| Third metacarpal | 48.3 | 47.9 | 47.4 |
| Fourth metacarpal | 44.5 | 43.9 | 45.4 |
| Fifth metacarpal | 46.7 | 44.7 | 45.1 |
Contribution percentage and permutation importance of correlated environmental variables used for HSM
| Variable | Percent contribution | Permutation importance |
|---|---|---|
| bio_14 [precipitation of driest month(mm)] | 58.6 | 37.5 |
| Tree_density | 34 | 29.5 |
| Altitude | 3.4 | 10.3 |
| bio_19 [precipitation of coldest quarter (mm)] | 3.2 | 19.8 |
| Canopy_height | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| bio_3 (isothermality) | 0.3 | 1.5 |
| bio_18 [precipitation of warmest quarter(mm)] | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Fig. 3Response curves showing relationships between the important environmental variables and probability of presence of Latidens salimalii and Jackknife test showing the relative importance of different environmental predictors. The values shown are an average of ten replicates of cross-validated Maxent models
Fig. 4Habitat suitability for L. salimalii in WG under the current climatic conditions, vegetation and topographic feature
The predicted suitable habitat (km2) for L. salimalii under future emission scenarios (RCP 4.5, RCP 6.0 and RCP 8.5)
| Habitat suitability | Current | 2070 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RCP4.5 | RCP 6.0 | RCP 8.5 | ||
| Least potential (0–0.13) | 112,912 | 119,363 (− 5.71%) | 124,822 (10.55%) | 130,338 (15.43) |
| Moderate potential (0.13–025) | 4762 | 8965 (− 88.26%) | 7473 (56.93%) | 3207 (− 32.65) |
| Good potential (0.25–0.5) | 6796 | 5743 (15.49%) | 2364 (− 65.21%) | 1255 (− 81.53%) |
| High potential (0.5–0.75) | 5037 | 942 (81.30%) | 363 (− 92.79%) | 223 (− 95.57%) |
| Very-high potential (0.75–1) | 4494 | 10 (99.78%) | 0 (− 100.00%) | 0 (− 100.00) |
Fig. 5Predicted future distribution model of L. salimalii under RCP 4.5 (a), RCP 6.0 (b) and RCP 8.5 (c) emission scenarios. The logistic output raster classified into five potential classes viz., very high potential (> 0.7.5), high potential (0.5–0.75), good potential (0.25–0.5), moderate potential (0.13–0.25) and least potential (< 0.13)