Literature DB >> 33040980

Funding and public reporting strategies for reducing multiple pregnancy from fertility treatments.

Georgina M Chambers1, Elena Keller2, Stephanie Choi2, Yakoub Khalaf3, Sara Crawford4, Willings Botha5, William Ledger6.   

Abstract

The health of children born through assisted reproductive technologies (ART) is particularly vulnerable to policy decisions and market forces that play out before they are even conceived. ART treatment is costly, and public and third-party funding varies significantly between and within countries, leading to considerable variation in consumer affordability globally. These relative cost differences affect not only who can afford to access ART treatment, but also how ART is practiced in terms of embryo transfer practices, with less affordable treatment creating a financial incentive to transfer more than one embryo to maximize the pregnancy rates in fewer cycles. One mechanism for reducing the burden of excessive multiple pregnancies is to link insurance coverage to the number of embryos that can be transferred; another is to combine supportive funding with patient and clinician education and public reporting that emphasizes a "complete" ART cycle (all embryo transfers associated with an egg retrieval) and penalizes multiple embryo transfers. Improving funding for fertility services in a way that respects clinician and patient autonomy and allows patients to undertake a sufficient number of cycles to minimize moral hazard improves outcomes for mothers and babies while reducing the long-term economic burden associated with fertility treatments.
Copyright © 2020 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assisted reproductive technologies; funding; multiple pregnancy; reporting; single-embryo transfer

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33040980     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.08.1405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  2 in total

1.  What Features of Fertility Treatment do Patients Value? Price Elasticity and Willingness-to-Pay Values from a Discrete Choice Experiment.

Authors:  Elena Keller; Willings Botha; Georgina M Chambers
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Cumulative live birth rate according to the number of receiving governmental subsidies for assisted reproductive technology in Saitama Prefecture, Japan: A retrospective study using individual data for governmental subsidies.

Authors:  Seung Chik Jwa; Osamu Ishihara; Akira Kuwahara; Kazuki Saito; Hidekazu Saito; Yukihiro Terada; Yasuki Kobayashi; Eri Maeda
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2021-06-20
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.