Literature DB >> 33040589

A guide to improve your causal inferences from observational data.

Koen Raymaekers1,2, Koen Luyckx1,3, Philip Moons4,5,6.   

Abstract

True causality is impossible to capture with observational studies. Nevertheless, within the boundaries of observational studies, researchers can follow three steps to answer causal questions in the most optimal way possible. Researchers must: (a) repeatedly assess the same constructs over time in a specific sample; (b) consider the temporal sequence of effects between constructs; and (c) use an analytical strategy that distinguishes within from between-person effects. In this context, it is demonstrated how the random intercepts cross-lagged panel model can be a useful statistical technique. A real-life example of the relationship between loneliness and quality of life in adolescents with congenital heart disease is provided to show how the model can be practically implemented.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Research methods; causality; nursing research; quantitative; repeated measures

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33040589      PMCID: PMC7817987          DOI: 10.1177/1474515120957241

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs        ISSN: 1474-5151            Impact factor:   3.908


  17 in total

1.  Group-based trajectory modeling in clinical research.

Authors:  Daniel S Nagin; Candice L Odgers
Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 18.561

2.  A critique of the cross-lagged panel model.

Authors:  Ellen L Hamaker; Rebecca M Kuiper; Raoul P P P Grasman
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2015-03

3.  Comparing personal trajectories and drawing causal inferences from longitudinal data.

Authors:  S W Raudenbush
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 24.137

4.  Full Information Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Latent Variable Interactions With Incomplete Indicators.

Authors:  Heining Cham; Evgeniya Reshetnyak; Barry Rosenfeld; William Breitbart
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 5.  The disaggregation of within-person and between-person effects in longitudinal models of change.

Authors:  Patrick J Curran; Daniel J Bauer
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 24.137

6.  Functional status and well-being of patients with chronic conditions. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study.

Authors:  A L Stewart; S Greenfield; R D Hays; K Wells; W H Rogers; S D Berry; E A McGlynn; J E Ware
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-08-18       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Parental support, internalizing symptoms, perceived health status, and quality of life in adolescents with congenital heart disease: influences and reciprocal effects.

Authors:  Koen Luyckx; Eva Goossens; Jessica Rassart; Silke Apers; Janne Vanhalst; Philip Moons
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2012-11-20

8.  Mediated effects of insomnia, psychological distress and medication adherence in the association of eHealth literacy and cardiac events among Iranian older patients with heart failure: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Chung-Ying Lin; Maryam Ganji; Mark D Griffiths; Marie Ernsth Bravell; Anders Broström; Amir H Pakpour
Journal:  Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 3.908

9.  The Longitudinal Association between Self-esteem and Depressive Symptoms in Adolescents: Separating between-person effects from within-person effects.

Authors:  M Masselink; E Van Roekel; B L Hankin; L Keijsers; G M A Lodder; J Vanhalst; M Verhagen; J F Young; A J Oldehinkel
Journal:  Eur J Pers       Date:  2018-11-05

10.  Self-care and health-related quality of life in chronic heart failure: A longitudinal analysis.

Authors:  Dionne Kessing; Johan Denollet; Jos Widdershoven; Nina Kupper
Journal:  Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 3.908

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.