Weining Yang1, Daniel Milad2, Nikolaus E Wolter1, Evan J Propst1, Yvonne Chan3. 1. Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada. 2. Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec City, QC, Canada. 3. Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, ON, Canada. Electronic address: y.chan@utoronto.ca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Esophageal foreign body (EFB) is a common presentation in pediatric hospitals. Rigid and flexible esophagoscopy are both primary modalities used for EFB removal. By systematically reviewing the literature, we sought to assess success and complication rates of both rigid and flexible esophagoscopy in pediatric EFB retrieval. METHODS: A systematic search of the literature was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science, CINAHL. Two authors independently reviewed 74 abstracts and included studies that documented success rates of flexible and rigid esophagoscopy for EFB retrieval. The certainty and quality of the overall body of evidence was evaluated in accordance with the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. RESULTS: Five retrospective chart reviews published between 1993 and 2016 identified 955 patients with a mean age of 4.2 (range 3.2-5.3 years). Foreign bodies were localized to the upper esophagus in 69.6%, middle esophagus in 13.0% and lower esophagus in 11.5%. Coins (82.1%) and food boluses (8.5%) comprised the majority of EFB. The success rate of foreign body retrieval was 95.4% with rigid esophagoscopy and 97.4% with flexible esophagoscopy. Complication rates were 2.4% for rigid esophagoscopy and 3.4% for flexible esophagoscopy. Rates of successful foreign body retrieval (odds ratio [OR] = 1.9 [95% CI 0.9-3.8; p = 0.07]) and complications (OR = 0.9 [95% CI 0.3-2.3; p = 0.79]) were not significantly different across modalities. There were no mortalities in any of the studies analyzed. CONCLUSION: Flexible and rigid esophagoscopy are equally safe and effective for the retrieval of EFB in children. Otolaryngologists, gastroenterologists, and pediatric general surgeons can be consulted for foreign body retrieval depending on institutional policies and resource availability.
BACKGROUND: Esophageal foreign body (EFB) is a common presentation in pediatric hospitals. Rigid and flexible esophagoscopy are both primary modalities used for EFB removal. By systematically reviewing the literature, we sought to assess success and complication rates of both rigid and flexible esophagoscopy in pediatric EFB retrieval. METHODS: A systematic search of the literature was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science, CINAHL. Two authors independently reviewed 74 abstracts and included studies that documented success rates of flexible and rigid esophagoscopy for EFB retrieval. The certainty and quality of the overall body of evidence was evaluated in accordance with the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. RESULTS: Five retrospective chart reviews published between 1993 and 2016 identified 955 patients with a mean age of 4.2 (range 3.2-5.3 years). Foreign bodies were localized to the upper esophagus in 69.6%, middle esophagus in 13.0% and lower esophagus in 11.5%. Coins (82.1%) and food boluses (8.5%) comprised the majority of EFB. The success rate of foreign body retrieval was 95.4% with rigid esophagoscopy and 97.4% with flexible esophagoscopy. Complication rates were 2.4% for rigid esophagoscopy and 3.4% for flexible esophagoscopy. Rates of successful foreign body retrieval (odds ratio [OR] = 1.9 [95% CI 0.9-3.8; p = 0.07]) and complications (OR = 0.9 [95% CI 0.3-2.3; p = 0.79]) were not significantly different across modalities. There were no mortalities in any of the studies analyzed. CONCLUSION: Flexible and rigid esophagoscopy are equally safe and effective for the retrieval of EFB in children. Otolaryngologists, gastroenterologists, and pediatric general surgeons can be consulted for foreign body retrieval depending on institutional policies and resource availability.