Literature DB >> 33038837

Regional competition, environmental decentralization, and target selection of local governments.

Guoxiang Li1, Fanyong Guo2, Danyang Di3.   

Abstract

Promoting environmental management system reform in an orderly manner and coordinating central and local environmental protection responsibilities are important for high-quality economic development. Based on panel data of 289 cities in China from 2008 to 2016, this paper uses the fixed effects model and threshold regression model to discuss the relationships among regional competition, environmental decentralization, and target selection of local governments and to analyze whether environmental decentralization produces the Porter effect. Findings show that environmental decentralization does significantly promote economic development, strengthen environmental pollution control, and generate a strong Porter effect, due to greater R&D investment, improvement in green technology innovation ability, and optimization of the industrial structure. The effect of environmental decentralization shows significant regional heterogeneity in terms of regional financial pressure, economic development level, and environmental pressure, while regional competition distorts the effect of environmental decentralization. With the intensification of regional competition, environmental decentralization greatly improves the emission intensity of pollutants, whereas it promotes economic development after inhibiting it. The above conclusions are of great significance for pushing forward environmental decentralization, formulating a differentiated environmental decentralization strategy, and perfecting the government performance appraisal system.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Environmental pollution; Environmental responsibility; Financial pressure; Porter effect; Regional competition

Year:  2020        PMID: 33038837     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142536

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  6 in total

1.  Fiscal Decentralization, Public Health Expenditure and Public Health-Evidence From China.

Authors:  Wangzi Xu; Jia Lin
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-05-18

2.  Interplay of Environmental Regulation and Local Protectionism in China.

Authors:  Guanghui Tian; Jianming Miao; Changhong Miao; Yehua Dennis Wei; Dongyang Yang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Optimization of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Policy of Scientific and Technological Entrepreneur Talent Using Regional Competitive Advantage Theory.

Authors:  Xiaoxuan Yu; Baogui Du
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-12-14

4.  How Do Environmental Regulation and Environmental Decentralization Affect Regional Green Innovation? Empirical Research from China.

Authors:  Jing Tang; Shilong Li
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  Fiscal Decentralization, Green Technology Innovation, and Regional Air Pollution in China: An Investigation from the Perspective of Intergovernmental Competition.

Authors:  Di Wang; Zhiyuan Zhang; Ruyi Shi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 4.614

6.  Can the Behavioural Spillover Effect Affect the Environmental Regulations Strategy Choice of Local Governments?

Authors:  Yaling Deng; Daming You; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.