MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over 56,000 images of 268 mammograms from 94 patients were labeled to 3 classes according to the BI-RADS standard: "no microcalcifications" (BI-RADS 1), "probably benign microcalcifications" (BI-RADS 2/3), and "suspicious microcalcifications" (BI-RADS 4/5). Using the preprocessed images, a dCNN was trained and validated, generating 3 types of models: BI-RADS 4 cohort, BI-RADS 5 cohort, and BI-RADS 4 + 5 cohort. For the final validation of the trained dCNN models, a test data set consisting of 141 images of 51 mammograms from 26 patients labeled according to the corresponding BI-RADS classification from the radiological reports was applied. The performances of the dCNN models were evaluated, classifying each of the mammograms and computing the accuracy in comparison to the classification from the radiological reports. For visualization, probability maps of the classification were generated. RESULTS: The accuracy on the validation set after 130 epochs was 99.5% for the BI-RADS 4 cohort, 99.6% for the BI-RADS 5 cohort, and 98.1% for the BI-RADS 4 + 5 cohort. Confusion matrices of the "real-world" test data set for the 3 cohorts were generated where the radiological reports served as ground truth. The resulting accuracy was 39.0% for the BI-RADS 4 cohort, 80.9% for BI-RADS 5 cohort, and 76.6% for BI-RADS 4 + 5 cohort. The probability maps exhibited excellent image quality with correct classification of microcalcification distribution. CONCLUSIONS: The dCNNs can be trained to successfully classify microcalcifications on mammograms according to the BI-RADS classification system in order to act as a standardized quality control tool providing the expertise of a team of radiologists.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over 56,000 images of 268 mammograms from 94 patients were labeled to 3 classes according to the BI-RADS standard: "no microcalcifications" (BI-RADS 1), "probably benign microcalcifications" (BI-RADS 2/3), and "suspicious microcalcifications" (BI-RADS 4/5). Using the preprocessed images, a dCNN was trained and validated, generating 3 types of models: BI-RADS 4 cohort, BI-RADS 5 cohort, and BI-RADS 4 + 5 cohort. For the final validation of the trained dCNN models, a test data set consisting of 141 images of 51 mammograms from 26 patients labeled according to the corresponding BI-RADS classification from the radiological reports was applied. The performances of the dCNN models were evaluated, classifying each of the mammograms and computing the accuracy in comparison to the classification from the radiological reports. For visualization, probability maps of the classification were generated. RESULTS: The accuracy on the validation set after 130 epochs was 99.5% for the BI-RADS 4 cohort, 99.6% for the BI-RADS 5 cohort, and 98.1% for the BI-RADS 4 + 5 cohort. Confusion matrices of the "real-world" test data set for the 3 cohorts were generated where the radiological reports served as ground truth. The resulting accuracy was 39.0% for the BI-RADS 4 cohort, 80.9% for BI-RADS 5 cohort, and 76.6% for BI-RADS 4 + 5 cohort. The probability maps exhibited excellent image quality with correct classification of microcalcification distribution. CONCLUSIONS: The dCNNs can be trained to successfully classify microcalcifications on mammograms according to the BI-RADS classification system in order to act as a standardized quality control tool providing the expertise of a team of radiologists.
Authors: Frederik Abel; Anna Landsmann; Patryk Hejduk; Carlotta Ruppert; Karol Borkowski; Alexander Ciritsis; Cristina Rossi; Andreas Boss Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2022-05-29
Authors: Albin Sabani; Anna Landsmann; Patryk Hejduk; Cynthia Schmidt; Magda Marcon; Karol Borkowski; Cristina Rossi; Alexander Ciritsis; Andreas Boss Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2022-06-28