Literature DB >> 33037802

Controversies in ameloblastoma management: evaluation of decision making, based on a retrospective analysis.

A Hresko1, O Burtyn, L Pavlovskiy, P Snisarevskyi, J- Lapshyna, Y Chepurnyi, A Kopchak, K-H Karagozoglu, T Forouzanfar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The ameloblastoma management is still challenging to the high recurrence rates and significant morbidity associated with radical treatment. The purpose of this 10-year retrospective study was to analyze the influence of ameloblastoma type and treatment strategy on the long-term outcomes and recurrence rates.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The retrospective analyses of 64 histologically-confirmed ameloblastoma cases was performed. The possible risk factors for recurrence and the development of complications were estimated statistically.
RESULTS: The treatment strategy applied for this group of patients was the following: thirty-four patients (53.1%) were treated conservatively with enucleation or extended bone curettage. Radical treatment (bone resection) was applied in 30 (46.9%) cases. The follow-up period ranged from 2 to 10 years (mean value 4.28 ± 3,26). General recurrence rate consisted 32.8%. This study did not find significant correlations between clinical or histopathological features of the ameloblastoma and the recurrence rate. The only factor that significantly influence recurrence rate was the treatment strategy (41% in conservative treatment vs 15% in radical treatment, p<0.05). Postoperative complications were observed in 42 patients (65.6%) and included face asymmetry and disfigurement (17.2%), temporary paresthesia of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) - 23.4%, permanent paresthesia of IAN - 20.3%, paresis of a marginal branch of the facial nerve - 6.3%, infection 12.5%, and swelling - 20.3%. The complication rates, esthetic and functional deficiency were significantly higher in radically treated patients (p<0.05) Conclusions: Our study confirms that higher recurrence rate is associated with conservative treatment for ameloblastoma, while radical treatment leads to an increased number of postoperative complications that affect the patient's quality of life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33037802     DOI: 10.4317/medoral.24104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal        ISSN: 1698-4447


  5 in total

1.  A Retrospective Study of 158 Cases on the Risk Factors for Recurrence in Ameloblastoma.

Authors:  Ling Bi; Dong Wei; Dongsheng Hong; Jin Wang; Kejia Qian; Huiming Wang; Huiyong Zhu
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2021-07-25       Impact factor: 3.738

2.  Carbon ion radiotherapy for recurrent ameloblastoma: A case report.

Authors:  Yihe Zhang; Xiaojun Li; Yanshan Zhang; Yancheng Ye; Xin Pan; Tingchao Hu; Weizuo Chen; Hongyu Chai; Xin Wang; Yuling Yang
Journal:  SAGE Open Med Case Rep       Date:  2022-03-24

Review 3.  Surgical Margins for Ameloblastoma in Dogs: A Review With an Emphasis on the Future.

Authors:  Stephanie Goldschmidt
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-03-22

4.  Recurrent Ameloblastoma: Clinical Manifestation and Disease-Free Survival Rate.

Authors:  Andrii Hresko; Roman Palyvoda; Olha Burtyn; Yurii Chepurnyi; Andrii Kopchak; Marco Helder; Tymour Forouzanfar
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 4.501

5.  Effectiveness of Resective Surgery in Complex Ameloblastoma of the Jaws: A Retrospective Multicenter Observational Study.

Authors:  Davide Sozzi; Andrea Cassoni; Elena De Ponti; Mattia Moretti; Resi Pucci; Davide Spadoni; Gabriele Canzi; Giorgio Novelli; Valentino Valentini
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 6.575

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.